GNU bug report logs - #52238
[PATCH] gnu: Add MEGA SDK

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: Jaft <jaft.r <at> outlook.com>, 52238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#52238] [PATCH] gnu: Add MEGA SDK
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 20:52:59 +0100

Am Donnerstag, den 02.12.2021, 06:32 +0000 schrieb Jaft:
> * gnu/packages/mega.scm (mega-sdk):Add MEGA SDK
Should be "New variable."

> The SDK is a dependency of MEGAsync so I thought to make a new file
> since there's multiple packages that are MEGA related and then I
> discovered that the megacmd package exists; is it better for this to
> be placed in sync.scm, next to megacmd?
Sync is good.  If existing Mega packages use the SDK, try to unbundle
them.

> ---
I don't know if I told you that yet, but comments ought to go below
this line.

> +(define-public mega-sdk
> +=C2=A0 (let ([version "3.9.10"])
> +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (package
> +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (name "mega-sdk")
I hate you too, Outlook.

> +(define-public mega-sdk
> +  (let ([version "3.9.10"])
Guile is not Racket, we use uniform brackets.
> +    (package
> +      (name "mega-sdk")
> +      (version version)
There's no reason to let-bind version if you're just going to assign it
here anyway.
> +      (source (origin
> +                (method git-fetch)
> +                (uri (git-reference
> +                      (url "https://github.com/meganz/sdk/")
> +                      (commit (string-append "v" version))))
> +                (file-name (git-file-name name version))
> +                (sha256 (base32
> +                         
> "08qw23rm4rrvlsbcixrncbi5x0qgqkpx74l5f1gq2rgll0ksx8ph"))
> +                (modules '((guix build utils)))))
> +      (build-system gnu-build-system)
> +      (native-inputs `(("autoconf" ,autoconf)
> +                       ("automake" ,automake)
> +                       ("libtool" ,libtool)))
> +      (inputs `(("crypto++" ,crypto++)
> +                ("zlib" ,zlib)
> +                ("sqlite" ,sqlite)
> +                ("openssl" ,openssl)
> +                ("c-ares" ,c-ares)
> +                ("curl" ,curl)
> +                ("freeimage" ,freeimage)
> +                ("readline" ,readline)
> +                ("libsodium" ,libsodium)))
> +      (arguments `(#:tests? #f))
Never leave #:tests? #f uncommented.
> +      (home-page "https://mega.nz/sdk")
> +      (synopsis "SDK for the MEGA service, offered by MEGA Limited")
Sponsored by RAID: Shadow Legends.
> +      (description "A low-level SDK for the MEGA service which
> powers the
> +file-sharing site.  This package provides two executables:
> +@itemize
> +@item megacli: a command-line tool that allows usage of all SDK
> features
> +@item megasimplesync: a command line tool that allows usage of the
> +synchronization engine
> +@end itemize")
> +      (license license:bsd-2))))
Given the megacli command, what's the relation to existing MEGA
packages, particularly megacmd?

Cheers

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.