GNU bug report logs - #52238
[PATCH] gnu: Add MEGA SDK

Previous Next

Full log

Message #47 received at 52238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: Jaft <jaft.r <at> outlook.com>, "52238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <52238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: megacmd: Add mega-sdk as dependency.
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 09:42:52 +0100

Am Sonntag, dem 13.02.2022 um 08:34 +0000 schrieb Jaft:
> > On Saturday, February 5, 2022, 12:59:47 AM CST, Liliana Marie
> > Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> wrote: 
> > Am Samstag, dem 05.02.2022 um 03:05 +0000 schrieb Jaft:
> > > In that case, I'm not sure that I have enough experience or
> > > knowledge with make tools to be able to untangle things, I'm
> > > afraid.
> > Fair enough, on the top of my head I'm not too sure how to untangle
> > this either.  However, note that mega-sdk appears pretty useless as
> > a standalone package, so I'd like to solve that issue before
> > pushing it.
> 
> That's fair; I had been first trying to get it added as a package as
> I was trying to package up MEGAsync and, as you might imagine, this
> is a dependency of it. I've nearly got the MEGAsync package working
> but need to get icons working properly, still; if I'm able to get it,
> would it make sense to send a patch here and move forward with that
> package?
Sure.  As long as there's a consumer to test that the package is
working as expected, everything ought to be fine.  I don't know which
road will be the easier one, however.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.