GNU bug report logs - #52237
29.0.50; [PATCH] Doubled separators in context-menu-mode

Previous Next

Full log

Message #51 received at 52237 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
To: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Cc: 52237 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#52237: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Doubled separators in
 context-menu-mode
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 14:09:50 -0800

On 12/4/2021 12:56 PM, Jim Porter wrote:
> On 12/4/2021 11:50 AM, Juri Linkov wrote:
>> `context-menu-middle-separator' is a function, so it requires the
>> `context-menu-' prefix.  It adds the menu item [middle-separator].
>> Since "middle" is an adjective, the word order can't be 
>> "separator-middle".
>> But "buffers-separator" doesn't look nicer than `separator-buffers'.
> 
> I think `FOO-separator' is the best choice here for the separators 
> themselves. `FOO' acts as a noun adjunct[1], modifying the underlying 
> object: a separator. For functions that just make a separator, they'd be 
> named `MODULE-[FOO-]-separator', with `FOO-' being optional if it would 
> be redundant with the module name. So then 
> `context-menu-middle-separator' is the right function name, and it adds 
> a separator named `middle-separator'.
> 
> `buffers-separator' is a bit of an odd phrasing since, as the Wikipedia 
> article mentions, "Noun adjuncts were traditionally mostly singular". 
> However, I think it's still a bit easier to read that correctly as "the 
> separator used to mark the buffers", whereas `separator-buffers' reads 
> more like "buffers used to separate things" to me.
> 
> Since this should just be a trivial renaming, hopefully we can merge 
> that into Emacs 28 so we're not locked into the current names.
> 
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noun_adjunct

Ok, filed bug#52286 for this: 
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2021-12/msg00327.html

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.