Subject: bug#52235: 29.0.50; Suggestion: refactor time.el into a more general 'clock' framework

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2021 09:26:33 +0200

> From: Stefan Kangas <[email-masked]>
> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 16:52:16 -0800
> Cc: Arthur Miller <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
> 
>     - or t (with non-nil REPEAT) meaning the next integral
>       multiple of REPEAT.
> 
> Shouldn't that be "integer" multiple?

No, "integral" is correct here.  "Integer multiple" is actually a
subtle mistake.