GNU bug report logs - #52209
28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Bob Rogers <rogers-emacs <at> rgrjr.homedns.org>
Cc: 52209 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 12:58:14 +0100

Bob Rogers <rogers-emacs <at> rgrjr.homedns.org> writes:

> So which do you prefer?

With a hyphen.

>    I'm also looking at defining a date-parse-error condition with a few
> error symbol "subclasses," but I'm wondering about the tradeoff between
> having enough error symbols for precision in error reporting
> vs. cluttering the code with too many.  Thoughts?

Having a `date-parse-error' would be fine, but I'm unsure about the
utility of having a bunch of sub-errors, but perhaps you have a use case
in mind?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.