GNU bug report logs - #52109
[PATCH] gnu: Add unrar-free.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Foo Chuan Wei <chuanwei.foo <at> hotmail.com>

Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:20:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #41 received at 52109 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Leo Famulari" <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: "Liliana Marie Prikler" <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>,
 zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>,
 "Maxim Cournoyer" <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: kiasoc5 <kiasoc5 <at> disroot.org>, 52109 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Foo Chuan Wei <chuanwei.foo <at> hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#52109] [PATCH] gnu: Add unrar-free.
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 07:54:19 -0500
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, at 01:22, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> But as it stands right now, I see it as little more than a piece
> of software that makes people go "but how do I get the _real_ unrar?",

This argument, whether or not it has merit on its own, has no precedent within Guix as a reason to exclude a free software program.

I'm sure most of us can name some Guix packages that we dislike because we see them in some unflattering or uncharitable way. But, we bite our tongues because Guix has a precedent of accepting freely licensed programs that are minimally functionally and not malware. Guix has had very liberal package acceptance criteria at least since I joined, if not since it began, and changing this precedent should require overwhelming consensus.

If there is a concrete objection (not conjecture or speculation) to this patch based on the criteria of the FSDG and precedents of Guix package acceptance, please share it. Otherwise, I think the patch should be accepted.




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 117 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.