GNU bug report logs - #52075
[PATCH 0/4] gnu: alot: Update to 0.10.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #47 received at 52075 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: Tanguy LE CARROUR <tanguy <at> bioneland.org>, 52075 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#52075] [PATCH 3/4] gnu: Add python-notmuch2.
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:41:53 -0500 (EST)

On Wed, 24 Nov 2021, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us> writes:
>
>> As far as appropriate, do you know more about the origin of these
>> "notmuch2" bindings? I know that at some point notmuch upstream
>> re-wrote the binding using CFFI. Is that the origin of this package?
>> If so, then I would be inclined to make this package independent of
>> the existing python-notmuch package. If not, then please ignore this
>> concern.
>
> I do not grasp your concern. python-notmuch and python-notmuch2 share
> most fields. Inheritance prevents duplication, that's all.
>
> Why are you inclined to make this new package independant (in the sense
> of Guix inheritance) of python-notmuch?

It is possible that my concern was misplaced. My thinking was that if the 
two bindings were logically separate projects, rather than being 
variations on the same code, we should keep them logically separate in 
Guix even if they are superficially similar. However, it might not be a 
logically separate project, and that might not be the right way to think 
about it anyway.

I don't have an objection to the version using inheritance. I am still 
curious in learning about the differences between the two packages if only 
for my own edification.

Hopefully that clarifies, and sorry for adding noise to this review.

Best,
Jack

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.