Subject: bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:44:48 -0500

>> Indeed, but I'm not sure what we can do about it.
> Maybe, once the non-lexical dialect is gone, we can make (closure (t)
> (lambda ...)) identical to (lambda ...) and then prefer the latter
> again.

That's sufficiently far into the future that i have no idea whether
it'll be a good idea ;-)

        Stefan