GNU bug report logs - #52044
Various Program Settings not Saving and Icons not Recognized

Previous Next

Full log

Message #29 received at 52044 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jaft <wamm_kd_schmelingski <at> yahoo.com>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Cc: "52044 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <52044 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Various Program Settings not Saving and Icons not Recognized
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 20:16:05 +0000 (UTC)

> Am Donnerstag, den 02.12.2021, 02:10 +0000 schrieb Jaft:
> > I had noticed that the core-updates-frozen branch had been merged so
> > I upgraded but found things pretty much the same as before.
> Please come back, you're within the wrong timeline.

Oh, I don't mean that I used another branch; I saw it got merged to master (I believe) so I just did a guix pull and then guix upgrade. I'm still using stable. Sorry about the confusion!

> > I saw an old patch (
> > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=e311ef4f87f7ad8db2114e5f89961eea0240893b
> > ) and, while I'd checked rofi for gdk-pixbuf+svg – before –, –
> > somehow – it made me think to check librsvg, this time, and found
> > that it was using gdk-pixbuf, rather than gdk-pixbuf+svg. I then made
> > a package inheriting librsvg but using gdk-pixbuf+svg, instead, and
> > made a package which inherited rofi but used my librsvg package and,
> > with that installed, rofi worked with .svgs, then.
> > 
> > Am I right in assuming librsvg ought to be using the latter, as the
> > library deals directly with handling SVGs? If so, I can put together
> > a patch to submit.
> Have you checked using gdk-pixbuf+svg as input to rofi directly?  I
> don't see why we would have to go in circles for librsvg, the component
> you're trying to use is gdk-pixbuf.

I just checked and it does; I was going off of the package formation in Guix but, checking the listed dependencies on the rofi GitHub page (https://github.com/davatorium/rofi/blob/next/INSTALL.md#external-libraries), it does list gdk-pixbuf as one so, perhaps, it makes more sense to build with that instead of librsvg.

I had assumed the package inputs for rofi were already accurate and, if gdk-pixbuf doesn't have SVG support while gdk-pixbuf+svg does, it seemed plausible that gdk-pixbuf+svg would be the preferred package for librsvg as librsvg is dealing with SVGs, perhaps part of the reason for SVG icons not getting rendered in applications like Thunar, XFCE, etc. (that being said, I'm unfamiliar with the librsvg code so, perhaps, this assumption of how the gdk-pixbuf dependency is being used is incorrect, on my part).

In any case, librsvg is not listed as a dependency for rofi while gdk-pixbuf is and swapping librsvg for gdk-pixbuf+svg in the rofi package still seemed to build it alright (and render SVGs) so, at least directly for rofi, directly using dgk-pixbuf+svg would still solve the SVG issue for it.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.