GNU bug report logs - #52030
[PATCH] gnu: Add feather font

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Jaft <jaft.r <at> outlook.com>

Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 04:50:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #11 received at 52030 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jaft <jaft.r <at> outlook.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: "52030 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <52030 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#52030: [PATCH] gnu: Add feather font
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:24:33 +0000 (UTC)
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
> On Friday, December 10, 2021, 08:28:42 AM CST, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote: 
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Jaft,
>
> > +    (name "font-atui-feather")
> > +    (version "0")
> > +    (source (origin
> > +              (method url-fetch/zipbomb)
> > +              (uri "https://github.com/AT-UI/feather-font/archive/refs/heads/master.zip")
> > +              (sha256 (base32 "0lp1m1a47s56rj0q6nj8j5snkbw8jq3q7zwdzf86sbbglq170inh"))))
>
> Note that ‘master.zip’ changes at each commit (and its content can also
> change even if the HEAD commit is unchanged because it’s a generated
> file.)
>
> Could you instead change it to refer to a non-generated zip file, or use
> ‘git-fetch’ to obtain a checkout?
>
> You may also need to adjust the version string.

Huh; sorry about that. I knew that and yet completely missed it, when writing this up. The repo. doesn't have any tags or releases (maybe that's what my brain was thinking when it originally used master) so I've just pointed it to the latest commit they'd made, in the revision.

> > +    (build-system font-build-system)
> > +    (home-page "https://at-ui.github.io/feather-font/")
> > +    (synopsis "Iconfont version of Feather")
> +    (description "Feather is a collection of simply beautiful open source icons.
>
> Everything is free software/data in Guix, so you can remove “open
> source”.  :-)

Haha; oh, right: fair point. Removed.

> Could you send an updated patch?  Preferably as a attachment to make
> sure it’s not mangled on its way.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Ludo’.

For some reason, I only remembered the part of the documentation that says you can submit the patch in the body of the E-mail but, double-checking my memory, it definitely also lists being able to send the patch as an attachment. I'll start doing that as others have mentioned mangling, as well.
[feather2.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 118 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.