GNU bug report logs - #51838
[PATCH 00/11] guix: node-build-system: Support compiling add-ons with node-gyp.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Philip McGrath <philip <at> philipmcgrath.com>

Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 12:43:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #173 received at 51838 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com>
To: Timothy Sample <samplet <at> ngyro.com>
Cc: 51838 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com>,
 Philip McGrath <philip <at> philipmcgrath.com>,
 Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#51838: [PATCH 00/11] guix: node-build-system: Support
 compiling add-ons with node-gyp.
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 20:54:26 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Timothy,

Timothy Sample <samplet <at> ngyro.com> writes:

> Hi Philip,
>
> There are some really valuable changes in here, thanks!  I would like to
> start understanding and reviewing the changes so that we can get some of
> this good stuff merged in.  However, I have one question that I couldn’t
> answer from reading here or at <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/49946>: is
> there an agreement between you and Pierre that these patches are the
> “right” way to do native addons for Node.js.  More importantly, is the
> general plan that we merge these changes, and then Pierre rebases their
> Tree-sitter changes on top these?
>
> Pierre, maybe you could weigh in here?

The overall approach looks good to me, it's better than what I
originally proposed for sure :-).  That being said, I'm not very
familiar with the Node.js ecosystem so I don't know if it's necessarily
the right way, but I suspect the correct way for node isn't very Guix-y
so I'm not too worried about that.

It's on my TODO list to take another look at the patches as well :-),
then yes, I'm planning on rebasing my tree-sitter series on top.

> Sorry if I missed something.  I assume everything is OK, but I want to
> be sure before I start digging into the details of the patches –
> especially those first few more complicated ones.  :)

Thanks for taking a look!

Pierre
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 195 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.