From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:14:15 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#51777 <51777@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#51777 <51777@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 27.2; Markup Typo in Elisp Introduction Reply-To: bug#51777 <51777@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:14:15 +0000 retitle 51777 27.2; Markup Typo in Elisp Introduction reassign 51777 emacs submitter 51777 Nicolas Semrau severity 51777 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 11 16:25:25 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2021 21:25:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42459 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mlHZV-0004fK-Jz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 16:25:25 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:41654) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mlHZU-0004fD-Ax for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 16:25:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38652) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mlHZU-0006fe-68 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 16:25:24 -0500 Received: from [2003:cd:b703:bb01:77ae:641f:b56f:4180] (port=59608 helo=localhost) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mlHZR-00056q-Nm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 16:25:23 -0500 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 37E6A15947; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 22:17:50 +0100 (CET) From: Nicolas Semrau To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 27.2; Markup Typo in Elisp Introduction Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 22:17:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87h7ci5r4n.fsf@p200300cdb703bb0177ae641fb56f4180.dip0.t-ipconnect.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2003:cd:b703:bb01:77ae:641f:b56f:4180 (failed) Received-SPF: none client-ip=2003:cd:b703:bb01:77ae:641f:b56f:4180; envelope-from=nsemrau@localhost; helo=localhost X-Spam_score_int: 98 X-Spam_score: 9.8 X-Spam_bar: +++++++++ X-Spam_report: (9.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HELO_LOCALHOST=3.828, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_NONE=0.001, SPOOFED_FREEMAIL=1.229, SPOOFED_FREEMAIL_NO_RDNS=0.001, SPOOF_GMAIL_MID=1.499 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: reject X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In line 5804 of the file /doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi on the emacs-28 branch the line reads "and not just to the name of a buffer, the @code{insert-buffer function}". The closing parenthesis of the "@code" markup falsely encloses the word "function" in it. It should be behind "insert-buffer" instead. Content analysis details: (1.4 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (nicolas.semrau[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record 1.0 FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD 'From' gmail.com does not match 'Received' headers 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 1.3 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available. 0.9 SPOOF_GMAIL_MID From Gmail but it doesn't seem to be... X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) In line 5804 of the file /doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi on the emacs-28 branch the line reads "and not just to the name of a buffer, the @code{insert-buffer function}". The closing parenthesis of the "@code" markup falsely encloses the word "function" in it. It should be behind "insert-buffer" instead. On master, the same error is on line 5821 of that file. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 11 22:39:40 2021 Received: (at 51777) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2021 03:39:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42809 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mlNPg-0001n0-NW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 22:39:40 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60616) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mlNPe-0001mm-Sn for 51777@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 22:39:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=SXkgPBPVTELDXb2U4ZGiyOHnjwcCW8sH/xC6CkC8ukQ=; b=n32o4sZvyD19fxDCEGkh5pbOem rF03ie+3IgrbjgwyfnZnYCbCd7bYTYJj7FydEQD2zoET9tDgtbzoQPZwDiv5CDsFpi+rLhDOOwiQn kmOsyW26fwMaqvJjhrQ8h/NN5U8p7g/GYIhHkDu58a8JP49JRrOfqkYGaANfX7NhMM0s=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mlNPX-0003k9-0M; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 04:39:33 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Nicolas Semrau Subject: Re: bug#51777: 27.2; Markup Typo in Elisp Introduction References: <87h7ci5r4n.fsf@p200300cdb703bb0177ae641fb56f4180.dip0.t-ipconnect.de> X-Now-Playing: Sonic Youth's _Dirty_: "100%" Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 04:39:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h7ci5r4n.fsf@p200300cdb703bb0177ae641fb56f4180.dip0.t-ipconnect.de> (Nicolas Semrau's message of "Thu, 11 Nov 2021 22:17:28 +0100") Message-ID: <87a6ia2gb1.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Nicolas Semrau writes: > In line 5804 of the file > /doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi on the emacs-28 branch the line reads > > "and not just to the name of a buffer, the @code{insert-buffer > function}". > > The closing [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51777 Cc: 51777@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Nicolas Semrau writes: > In line 5804 of the file > /doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi on the emacs-28 branch the line reads > > "and not just to the name of a buffer, the @code{insert-buffer > function}". > > The closing parenthesis of the "@code" markup falsely encloses the word > "function" in it. It should be behind "insert-buffer" instead. Thanks; I've now fixed this on the emacs-28 branch (which will be merged with master later). -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 11 22:39:47 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2021 03:39:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42812 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mlNPm-0001nL-Ue for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 22:39:47 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60630) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mlNPm-0001n1-0J for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 22:39:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=TDTYZi4eudNrXKdfl5pIcVtESL091Vxlw2CbvQqzofc=; b=Mjm5TKaxg2KcDj/FHHBhdzWlyx NqULYshyJBiVR4mIykMZMOTt0JVd0pqAWNtFx1IhtWwbBeRa9a7DWVheOJPYQyL+uqv/mruNFkjGP lEWSqaMSvvG99w0Hbxw4Vd5wj48q+mECK8wivh3tyWb0onIUbPtQSqS1Ng5DD8lOjLDY=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mlNPe-0003kH-1j for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 04:39:40 +0100 Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 04:39:37 +0100 Message-Id: <878rxu2gau.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #51777 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 51777 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 51777 28.1 quit From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:14:15 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 12:24:13 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator