GNU bug report logs -
#51737
Add Waydroid
Previous Next
Full log
Message #77 received at 51737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Julien,
agreed, though rather than being non-free the issue is more of being opaque as we shouldn't trust what's inside.
There's documentation on how to build one based on Lineage OS. [1]
Do you think if LineageOS would build the Waydroid image as another device it would be acceptable for Guix to download the artifact directly? [2]
Also how's the bionic library going?
[1] https://docs.waydro.id/development/compile-waydroid-lineage-os-based-images[2] https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/
----
Petr
------- Original Message -------
On Tuesday, November 1st, 2022 at 8:04 AM, Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu> wrote:
> That sounds good to me. We could have a default, though we must at least make sure we don't advertise for a non-free image.
>
> Concerning my own work, I'm currently trying to build some base system libraries. I managed to get a working cross-compiler for x86_64-linux-android, and I managed to cross-build a couple libraries. I'm hopeful I'll be able to build bionic (android's libc) by the end of the week, then a complete cross toolchain that will help build the rest of the system.
>
> Le 1 novembre 2022 07:51:17 GMT+01:00, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> Am Montag, dem 31.10.2022 um 19:30 +0000 schrieb phodina:
>>
>>> Regarding the Waydroid (Android) image.
>>>
>>> We are currently unable to build the whole image due to the issues
>>>
>>> summarized by Julien Lepiller on the 10 Years of Guix. Thanks for the
>>>
>>> presentation! [1]
>>>
>>> However, there is project in Nix that allows to build the image. [2]
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to use that instead of the one hardcoded in
>>>
>>> Waydroid?
>>
>> IIUC you would have to translate the nix packages there into guix
>>
>> packages, assuming there's a 1:1 translation (which might not be the
>>
>> case since everything's just a derivation in Nix). You also have to
>>
>> take into account different quality guidelines between Guix and Nix –
>>
>> Guix tends to be more stringent.
>>
>> Since it's possible to specify the URLs via command line, how about
>>
>> simply removing the defaults and making the respective command line
>>
>> options required for the time being?
>>
>> Cheers
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 85 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.