Subject: Re: bug#51733: 27.1; Detect impossible email addresses better

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 15:24:54 +0100

Robert Pluĭm <[email-masked]> writes:

> Double fun. Iʼd manually rfc2047 encoded that before sending it, so
> either gnus or Gmail encoded it again :-)

Of course it was encoded again -- =?utf-8?Q?Plu=C4=ADm?= is a perfectly
fine, if unusual, name.  😀  I think it's Bobby Table's brother?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no