GNU bug report logs - #51556
29.0.50; Poor contrast of Customize SVG icons with dark backgrounds

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Kévin Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 17:57:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.50

Fixed in version 29.1

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #65 received at 51556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Cc: jporterbugs <at> gmail.com, kevin.legouguec <at> gmail.com, 51556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#51556: 29.0.50; Poor contrast of Customize SVG icons with
 dark backgrounds
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 21:15:23 +0200
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 11:58:17 -0700
> Cc: 51556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, kevin.legouguec <at> gmail.com
> 
> > If you're the author of a little-known package, you can't really
> > expect theme authors to provide customized icons for your package that
> > fit with the theme. However, themes *do* specify at least a handful of
> > faces. As a package author, it would be convenient to be able to say
> > "render this icon using the foreground color of the `error' face", for
> > example. Then your package looks good with most themes without
> > requiring anyone to provide custom SVGs.
> 
> Exactly the point.  This goes for built-in packages as well.

How come built-in packages qualify as "little-known"?

For really little-known packages, my suggestion would be to use icons
whose visibility should be good with any theme.  Or they could not use
icons at all.




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 252 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.