From unknown Sat Jun 21 05:19:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#51554] [PATCH] gnu: libva: Update to 2.13.0 Resent-From: Josselin Poiret Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 16:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 51554 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 51554@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Josselin Poiret X-Debbugs-Original-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.163578266526514 (code B ref -1); Mon, 01 Nov 2021 16:05:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2021 16:04:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35939 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhZnN-0006ta-L9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:04:25 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39962) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhZnL-0006tQ-Ux for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:04:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhZnI-0006AU-DM for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:04:21 -0400 Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]:51644) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhZnC-0001Cb-Nl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:04:20 -0400 Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64]) by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 81238184BFA; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 16:04:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim; t=1635782650; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y/D45EGwkervGBpCI0vY9kIKhf7KfGglxAPTqU+5tLg=; b=UYxgFgdApp9dYxmBW7JbNkBLJBK3ToAm+L1h1fLGEHFPgpFKGeSoHjrnNlpGGZIjMeBc/o IGQLg7kMauwtESvXJRDYv7zrbpx4URUSeZDOvfUOMddPc5T0p8KdMFkihnBCqsm3r9wOCo NcOw9bCE1RBoK+U0AYCKR07V92YMbM7qFOtr2zLno3MXip0tp1mbc73ixm6UtDK8qv+/X0 6e7kpyjKqFw/V7AHU4GOETWljwHrSH6HqgrsY4oo5Wj50jVWDZFG0FGGTvj+q2X47sXjsQ 7xU8nO0ZO507E2Hmano+istxfPEhBGrCpK8MFWtikns0yTZIGrm0JuCXCQqaGg== From: Josselin Poiret Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 16:03:48 +0000 Message-Id: <20211101160348.21699-1-dev@jpoiret.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: jpoiret.xyz; auth=pass smtp.auth=jpoiret@jpoiret.xyz smtp.mailfrom=dev@jpoiret.xyz X-Spam-Level: **** Received-SPF: pass client-ip=206.189.101.64; envelope-from=dev@jpoiret.xyz; helo=jpoiret.xyz X-Spam_score_int: -1 X-Spam_score: -0.2 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.001, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=1.476, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/video.scm (libva): Update it. --- gnu/packages/video.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/video.scm b/gnu/packages/video.scm index d4d9eed68d..7f86dcc10c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/video.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/video.scm @@ -1425,14 +1425,14 @@ (define-public libmat [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)] 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom; id=dev%40jpoiret.xyz; ip=209.51.188.17; r=debbugs.gnu.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) * gnu/packages/video.scm (libva): Update it. --- gnu/packages/video.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/video.scm b/gnu/packages/video.scm index d4d9eed68d..7f86dcc10c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/video.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/video.scm @@ -1425,14 +1425,14 @@ (define-public libmatroska (define-public libva (package (name "libva") - (version "2.10.0") + (version "2.13.0") (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (string-append "https://github.com/intel/libva/releases/download/" version "/libva-" version ".tar.bz2")) (sha256 - (base32 "0dh2zjn6wi74ga75r6pbrrj8hjm213zyxvn9bv78z0fra1dy70gs")))) + (base32 "0q6l193x9whd80sjd5mx8cb7c0fcljb19nhfpla5h49nkzrq7lzs")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (native-inputs `(("pkg-config" ,pkg-config))) -- 2.33.1 From unknown Sat Jun 21 05:19:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#51554] [PATCH] gnu: libva: Update to 2.13.0 Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 21:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51554 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Josselin Poiret Cc: 51554@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 51554-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51554.16363217581612 (code B ref 51554); Sun, 07 Nov 2021 21:50:01 +0000 Received: (at 51554) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2021 21:49:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55094 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mjq2Q-0000Pv-Ju for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 16:49:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51470) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mjq2O-0000Pi-MZ for 51554@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 16:49:17 -0500 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=57108 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mjq2I-00062p-UL; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 16:49:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=r85BF1/cpjzPsm2+DaR99qq1b1kapKQ/eRinI45M64A=; b=bl6S41NSjEu/2PsERF92 eFOZhrpFpxukhihd8Qb6fEJVifjeYonKZ/eDeVP5hFtYrszFcWaTX7TwSQdWxYnAmiHkJ/OCfeLTk GGPPaPdDhZh73fZqDCJy34CKGYcUICrNjeadsJ1oV42DnYv5EnRsWL7uoY2l3eBWbcP4X7fkW/cDN s9N3UUln5G7xOu8fJWET9QHTehOG2WEFeQQAFbEI+hLU7B53fkPScOvB8RMCXoPk1U5YHvchSzl1X JEbRRXbKliBTYKZsMnvjAZzmF58ZgsvEQHhqx4ppmifsOSulDTfoIkB6cOkB0xDTg7Oa2PO3g8Bnr mOOUmR15/Kd/IQ==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201]:55548 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mjq2I-0002yO-Kd; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 16:49:10 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20211101160348.21699-1-dev@jpoiret.xyz> Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 22:49:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20211101160348.21699-1-dev@jpoiret.xyz> (Josselin Poiret's message of "Mon, 1 Nov 2021 16:03:48 +0000") Message-ID: <87mtmfk563.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) Hi, Josselin Poiret skribis: > * gnu/packages/video.scm (libva): Update it. For the record, this entails lots of rebuilds, contrary to what one might think: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -l -e '(force (@@ (gnu packages gl) libva-wit= hout-mesa))'=20 Building the following 1478 packages would ensure 2711 dependent packages a= re rebuilt: [=E2=80=A6] --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I suppose this could go to =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. Alternatively, we could keep =E2=80=98libva-without-mesa=E2=80=99 at its cu= rrent version and only upgrade =E2=80=98libva=E2=80=99; that could be done on master. Thoughts? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sat Jun 21 05:19:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#51554] [PATCH] gnu: libva: Update to 2.13.0 Resent-From: Josselin Poiret Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 09:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51554 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: dev@jpoiret.xyz, 51554@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 51554-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51554.163644932821665 (code B ref 51554); Tue, 09 Nov 2021 09:16:01 +0000 Received: (at 51554) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2021 09:15:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60820 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mkNE0-0005d4-10 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 04:15:28 -0500 Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]:42094) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mkNDx-0005a9-9o for 51554@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 04:15:26 -0500 Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64]) by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4DC7B184F62; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 09:15:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim; t=1636449324; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=P0ghSzCHqbnVJdk0Y37S+K2hJi4yvmnQ29hWkE2ufk8=; b=QmvDYnmruf9+6kf9I7m7sS5eksOJaPUXSsc8grhDgXP302mpYgFnnih4tKW3IuV5WcKS5v sl26Et8XtLcyx3khvk4xxz4gMCPR7SsNNncvEralFJutkgHVtiVCDbymwHXr/2jtLEt1mq vfHKVlVn8DOLyOKcgqhB6vv+wKAv/N/jGRXazW9RMps3FhOlZdT9Dye6uGnbwKdiG72f/k qNuzCbMDscD+UGJuK0FjKi/ZBVb5Uoy54/IT3MMgCTMRZIuvmRFbvLFP6VQUOcNgf5iYbs Ssfzx/pK4d0FbpP7WgbJqeGJxwszkW13CAVbYvWVRUAHHTi99Xt7DwikXasSqQ== From: Josselin Poiret In-Reply-To: <87mtmfk563.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20211101160348.21699-1-dev@jpoiret.xyz> <87mtmfk563.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 09:15:21 +0000 Message-ID: <87y25xg05y.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: jpoiret.xyz; auth=pass smtp.auth=jpoiret@jpoiret.xyz smtp.mailfrom=dev@jpoiret.xyz X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= writes: > For the record, this entails lots of rebuilds, contrary to what one > might think: > > --88--- > $ . [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= writes: > For the record, this entails lots of rebuilds, contrary to what one > might think: > > --88--- > $ . [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > For the record, this entails lots of rebuilds, contrary to what one > might think: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -l -e '(force (@@ (gnu packages gl) libva-w= ithout-mesa))'=20 > Building the following 1478 packages would ensure 2711 dependent packages= are rebuilt: [=E2=80=A6] > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > I suppose this could go to =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. My bad, I completely missed this. I initially wanted to upgrade libva because the older version doesn't work on core-updates-frozen with Wayland compositors, so I think it should ideally belong there if possible to avoid having broken hardware acceleration for a while when that branch is merged. If it does indeed lead to too many rebuilds, then maybe it could go onto core-updates-frozen-batched-changes, but then that'd delay its merging again. I'm not too sure between those, but I think it should be one of them. Best, Josselin Poiret From unknown Sat Jun 21 05:19:14 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Josselin Poiret Subject: bug#51554: closed (Re: bug#51554: [PATCH] gnu: libva: Update to 2.13.0) Message-ID: References: <87y25cafw5.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <20211101160348.21699-1-dev@jpoiret.xyz> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 51554 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix-patches X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: patch Reply-To: 51554@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 06:50:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1637823002-5431-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1637823002-5431-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #51554: [PATCH] gnu: libva: Update to 2.13.0 which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 51554@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 51554: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D51554 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1637823002-5431-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 51554-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2021 06:49:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55583 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mq8Zv-0001PG-QS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 01:49:56 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f52.google.com ([209.85.219.52]:42655) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mq8Zt-0001P0-9i for 51554-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 01:49:54 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f52.google.com with SMTP id b17so3718451qvl.9 for <51554-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 22:49:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ty3VmvTr1W+tnlR8vHdZj9FuP+/YMdJ7l5AOGuNdqbM=; b=DBdwTEIQW6GmVYxpuswD5ZjqbgCkpjpz6V4UkjjRQK7LGAH9W113eoTH0ymZD7OqNj XAt2j48n4qr6nU2FCis9uJDDuAIsVuO+dXQCAfzENT8s0I356p7BwlAhmISyOVNBCaDB c11XDqsvpzy2KNPrbTTFCrXIRp2RflaM5uZp9Y3tlGH6LGM90Nayse9jaeHM2Wvm45nL OnplOcwq/NmIAXLgcVAo0KQvu0onDlNFkOkZkRBYqEShMheZuEX0YCZeWpvMK/OlGBWt JinroEp0fUDuj3hGFIBefm4dO11FNn0SfXQUgna8cMqbGt3XPJ8XZPQ8rDEXOwk38yT6 xXkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ty3VmvTr1W+tnlR8vHdZj9FuP+/YMdJ7l5AOGuNdqbM=; b=zcNJkX2/SL+5S1T3yWEWdjcdl05Mrx6adseHDLwE8/yr2gGduv/M6PjtJQ/WogL4OQ P+lqtIDYnjBin8jPiHUoroB7e8BSCAIjeMXbeZJjGViWPNURAQ9EaiBxg9eFTm1P3Mxf z4Y5m15P921bQRztRNZSiZoAfLC6DpmP0FkncnxtZClJYCbGJv9UBqe8Gw7Hn65u2eaf krAlg6anYdiGQ9eBZ+wSXrADEYH9NjZ2tuHf+ojChZtq2T5y8xepr54WskVsByY/DRdn pf4yCvk9iYuj+fhjA0l/rwEXTRamYhOa9OVZotmppcBkOAmRuQiHAZ9YP+anwCFzOXm5 Mnqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531+YGvpEiCl+SkZTX2TmwJAUy4IsW6lhXHbThadt4UD3ZtFOy1S 7YNDvsNWto1P45EwJcQ9a6lLZu+51RhG7Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwMGkzPGn/czuWrPaL8M6l/067Lxpep43gFY6Nm8zNPAr8xIRgWiY7EQD2ceeZ58+sh2U3+IQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:4112:: with SMTP id kc18mr2773596qvb.76.1637822987500; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 22:49:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd ([207.35.95.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 22sm1062434qtw.12.2021.11.24.22.49.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 22:49:46 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Josselin Poiret Subject: Re: bug#51554: [PATCH] gnu: libva: Update to 2.13.0 References: <20211101160348.21699-1-dev@jpoiret.xyz> <87mtmfk563.fsf@gnu.org> <87y25xg05y.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 01:49:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87y25xg05y.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> (Josselin Poiret's message of "Tue, 09 Nov 2021 09:15:21 +0000") Message-ID: <87y25cafw5.fsf_-_@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, Josselin Poiret writes: > Ludovic Courtès writes: >> For the record, this entails lots of rebuilds, contrary to what one >> might think: >> >> --88--- >> $ ./pre-i [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (maxim.cournoyer[at]gmail.com) 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.219.52 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.219.52 listed in wl.mailspike.net] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51554-done Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 51554-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Hello, Josselin Poiret writes: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> For the record, this entails lots of rebuilds, contrary to what one >> might think: >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -l -e '(force (@@ (gnu packages gl) libva-= without-mesa))'=20 >> Building the following 1478 packages would ensure 2711 dependent package= s are rebuilt: [=E2=80=A6] >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> I suppose this could go to =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. > > My bad, I completely missed this. I initially wanted to upgrade libva > because the older version doesn't work on core-updates-frozen with > Wayland compositors, so I think it should ideally belong there if > possible to avoid having broken hardware acceleration for a while when > that branch is merged. If it does indeed lead to too many rebuilds, > then maybe it could go onto core-updates-frozen-batched-changes, but > then that'd delay its merging again. I'm not too sure between those, > but I think it should be one of them. I had totally missed that for the batched branch. Too bad. I know Ludovic had concerns about a ~3K rebuilds; that's a lot but currently only x86_64 and i686 are in a state of building the world it seems, so that's about 6K packages. I've bunched this with glib-networking, another similar sized rebuild, manually built most of the dependents on berlin for x86_64, and pushed as 0a787e67ecd0fab42c7ddfec639b53d58c15af6e. Closing. Maxim ------------=_1637823002-5431-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2021 16:04:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35939 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhZnN-0006ta-L9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:04:25 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39962) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhZnL-0006tQ-Ux for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:04:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhZnI-0006AU-DM for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:04:21 -0400 Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]:51644) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhZnC-0001Cb-Nl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:04:20 -0400 Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64]) by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 81238184BFA; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 16:04:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim; t=1635782650; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y/D45EGwkervGBpCI0vY9kIKhf7KfGglxAPTqU+5tLg=; b=UYxgFgdApp9dYxmBW7JbNkBLJBK3ToAm+L1h1fLGEHFPgpFKGeSoHjrnNlpGGZIjMeBc/o IGQLg7kMauwtESvXJRDYv7zrbpx4URUSeZDOvfUOMddPc5T0p8KdMFkihnBCqsm3r9wOCo NcOw9bCE1RBoK+U0AYCKR07V92YMbM7qFOtr2zLno3MXip0tp1mbc73ixm6UtDK8qv+/X0 6e7kpyjKqFw/V7AHU4GOETWljwHrSH6HqgrsY4oo5Wj50jVWDZFG0FGGTvj+q2X47sXjsQ 7xU8nO0ZO507E2Hmano+istxfPEhBGrCpK8MFWtikns0yTZIGrm0JuCXCQqaGg== From: Josselin Poiret To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libva: Update to 2.13.0 Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 16:03:48 +0000 Message-Id: <20211101160348.21699-1-dev@jpoiret.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: jpoiret.xyz; auth=pass smtp.auth=jpoiret@jpoiret.xyz smtp.mailfrom=dev@jpoiret.xyz X-Spam-Level: **** Received-SPF: pass client-ip=206.189.101.64; envelope-from=dev@jpoiret.xyz; helo=jpoiret.xyz X-Spam_score_int: -1 X-Spam_score: -0.2 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.001, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=1.476, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/video.scm (libva): Update it. --- gnu/packages/video.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/video.scm b/gnu/packages/video.scm index d4d9eed68d..7f86dcc10c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/video.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/video.scm @@ -1425,14 +1425,14 @@ (define-public libmat [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)] 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom; id=dev%40jpoiret.xyz; ip=209.51.188.17; r=debbugs.gnu.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Josselin Poiret X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) * gnu/packages/video.scm (libva): Update it. --- gnu/packages/video.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/video.scm b/gnu/packages/video.scm index d4d9eed68d..7f86dcc10c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/video.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/video.scm @@ -1425,14 +1425,14 @@ (define-public libmatroska (define-public libva (package (name "libva") - (version "2.10.0") + (version "2.13.0") (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (string-append "https://github.com/intel/libva/releases/download/" version "/libva-" version ".tar.bz2")) (sha256 - (base32 "0dh2zjn6wi74ga75r6pbrrj8hjm213zyxvn9bv78z0fra1dy70gs")))) + (base32 "0q6l193x9whd80sjd5mx8cb7c0fcljb19nhfpla5h49nkzrq7lzs")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (native-inputs `(("pkg-config" ,pkg-config))) -- 2.33.1 ------------=_1637823002-5431-1--