From unknown Thu Aug 21 14:54:40 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#51495 <51495@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#51495 <51495@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Avoid fonts with incomplete coverage of MATHEMATICAL chars Reply-To: bug#51495 <51495@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 21:54:40 +0000 retitle 51495 29.0.50; [PATCH] Avoid fonts with incomplete coverage of MATH= EMATICAL chars reassign 51495 emacs submitter 51495 K=C3=A9vin Le Gouguec severity 51495 normal tag 51495 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 29 17:40:51 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Oct 2021 21:40:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56175 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mgZcJ-0006NP-9W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:40:51 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:55154) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mgZcG-0006NG-Uy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:40:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59650) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mgZcF-0003pO-0u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:40:48 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::430]:35793) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mgZcD-00067l-3j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:40:46 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id i5so11066580wrb.2 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:40:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ENxcGyojVrkmcYPcULUGQfj5CHO3R32i0XTM5D1xQOw=; b=BR2UG+2jDLfFfBGknZDcBe2e0nz9eJkPyOGWz2P//WXEmReq7XHeY2ziq8Ny5mzYSY BqJuMZKSKoXwbysKhoTe7dMPUkHL7SKKPgGyErffVDlmOKnhXmGj7N58zazb+z5Kom3U snVBURlnAPf+IvLadY0dBj35gzpooHtjzA/jTXrZxZm+rlfaazHvaEtQq8ANb1daJvAc FXUuOW5lC37pgjgngycVXEsYmOs9UCNgE1j75RanfMlBTX4k3bUqu/pNLSHgf9TUJ1Xb bxaALK9AIKAxhZFbMHfk6ZCUoLTMbmzxydkuh0tviiN5RdkKaZS8EFuiLhImxiqNMeZu SYaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ENxcGyojVrkmcYPcULUGQfj5CHO3R32i0XTM5D1xQOw=; b=nn45op2q+Q2qgEPGoAUzNYQHdTJAQDDDPmL7B/pRSCXuT5uQ+cn97DF9Hf7zDgq91f J26EtWJdAESMGqdMTNu5Oj73ulm0+euFdrBCSb2jrvI3YeH/H0M4H8i+ONg66O+MSl29 Qyf9QVlc0GxU8sIBj8zWZd94ZlqiahwQ8R1Nqs7F+p8i8FObxafzw/8GDsV2fOqfQuO0 ud8N/oIioBPilwricCVFUgWExmOW2PY4CO90H0rzkAZuPOWlDyAPVaS6rB+4ZxtwewXt 6ukuESfj+/JhgAmetdJuP061X3m/DUxoUmxdSAf4YwZFJ5QCDmcNrGfNgNxjQk/utaUA qhhg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fWQvBBQJVHnV236OA1yenw1RZ065QBHtrM4SGbxefXWr3J3zx 0hcCjGHGOhkBCDsQK1dUjb/+KkfTxGw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtRJQuf6sxRXLvBK0UD5rr2FPBeAHIy3VC1xVcCmf22CtjVf3CLliAZdLdg/51ghOui8ME7w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2505:: with SMTP id d5mr14095797wma.194.1635543640660; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:40:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from amdahl30 ([2a01:e0a:253:fe0:2ef0:5dff:fed2:7b49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm9751682wmb.12.2021.10.29.14.40.39 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:40:40 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin_Le_Gouguec?= To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Avoid fonts with incomplete coverage of MATHEMATICAL chars Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 23:40:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87fssjv7ag.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::430; envelope-from=kevin.legouguec@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x430.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hello, This is a followup to a discussion on help-gnu-emacs[1] which revealed that script-representative-chars does not account for problematic fonts like KpMath[2] which provide only partial coverage for the MATHEMATICAL SCRIPT codepoints U+1D49C=E2=80=93U+1D4CF (=F0=9D=92=9C=E2=80=93=F0=9D=93= =8F). To be more specific, this font only covers MATHEMATICAL SCRIPT CAPITAL codepoints and does not cover MATHEMATICAL SCRIPT SMALL codepoints. Since setup-default-fontset only puts MATHEMATICAL SCRIPT CAPITAL A in script-representative-chars, Emacs fails to ensure that the fonts returned by Fontconfig also provide glyphs for SMALL codepoints. As soon as I get a bug number, I'll followup with a patch (reviewed by Eli[3]) that deals with the situation by adding both ends of each "math-subgroup" to script-representative-chars, using lists rather than vectors to make each codepoint mandatory. >From the discussion, it seems that this problem is not very common (the gap in KpMath seems very uncommon[2]), and has multiple workarounds (uninstalling the font, tweaking fontconfig rules, tweaking fontsets), so although the patch applies to both master and emacs-28, I guess there is no pressing need to have this on the release branch, and master would be more appropriate? Thank you for your time. [1] help-gnu-emacs <878s02u5m6.fsf@gmail.com> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2021-09/msg00150.html [2] http://mirrors.ctan.org/fonts/kpfonts-otf/doc/unimath-kpfonts.pdf =C2=A7 15.1.7, 15.1.8 [3] help-gnu-emacs <83k0jjcsal.fsf@gnu.org> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2021-09/msg00192.html In GNU Emacs 29.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.30, c= airo version 1.16.0) of 2021-10-26 built on amdahl30 Repository revision: f56408a6f0152cd46d1ea8a0985fbfeeb839ea06 Repository branch: master Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12013000 System Description: openSUSE Tumbleweed From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 29 17:43:44 2021 Received: (at 51495) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Oct 2021 21:43:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56184 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mgZf6-0006T7-4G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:43:44 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com ([209.85.221.44]:33661) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mgZf3-0006Sp-KY for 51495@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:43:42 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id m22so18838208wrb.0 for <51495@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:43:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=KVzEWaUFWqbCSeG2sG5MFpdlNKh0fZTTsPG8IZ/tTnI=; b=e6MsbWUhtk/pdex5wrDNrm6cNh0HxZ87es4OPbNP8zqjWruF4ajzAX52M6oMAhetY4 /T4/FvUD4pY1TY77JehncNqjXuxx5XsmodQ6WfIAK2qjB3UEqoOZf0foav1e9wQ6nKFu sc/ar2Oc/zwCaJAdgVZJsaTGyBasB0rmOQO9vKNkfurrutqiuqMh4b/wvlSe1QiS4dHH UKA2Z9URvwHIxj6l56i0RJm2eKoVRWunuXOezi163FiiaRxg5V1nZ/PmGOu+bcyq2e7/ VnODlPFNlNOuuxFOJVh9M13cDMFXIDmbo2MA+dk04Hg9Dfhzd5wPILC3KLW97h5KQM42 ZNwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=KVzEWaUFWqbCSeG2sG5MFpdlNKh0fZTTsPG8IZ/tTnI=; b=PihByjsbxvsgJQpZ1vHZuAtyldJZrbzDPcOSKHPv0LzBG7J0zbXdOyAbMPK2fC1ivW lLd7oCKfWZqBQgMJnrtvXmbKxbCBCTGGZujBFMwFUbs2D4gu2iqYUkm2U4piInSMWRTx xziG8ikWk062Ym4OuP1hn/uHkhGVGNda28e/622H2sY/R2uk5qKBuz/oGK7S7vErV3V+ 8p+RizIxnwe2NQYrJbnUZiJh566OSFPYc3ZtN+8SFtO7brgskrNEqtx3WESJH8egyL3V EAt0yN90s284u9dEY0qCLUEc0CqBelWjYt8cMgI1abPucJBOuknMlbh/KUwSH6GTzWEQ UHig== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5303VBx54Uw6749MGUTwSukGPTXB3UaJO0pZGJvJMlIYQsXZaiYu y+GFq9AxLLolV4fAaB/cBaSO/5Z0hDo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxMBG21oPXkwfTWa8djg3AdKpnEF2GxtdzQxb30FBvEkHNEFekFnbtpDxlFWTGSTZJ4cItX7g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:ad8:: with SMTP id c24mr14072550wmr.82.1635543815341; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from amdahl30 ([2a01:e0a:253:fe0:2ef0:5dff:fed2:7b49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j8sm310574wrh.16.2021.10.29.14.43.34 for <51495@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:43:34 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin_Le_Gouguec?= To: 51495@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#51495: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Avoid fonts with incomplete coverage of MATHEMATICAL chars References: <87fssjv7ag.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 23:43:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87fssjv7ag.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec"'s message of "Fri, 29 Oct 2021 23:40:39 +0200") Message-ID: <875ytfv75l.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51495 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain And the Patch That Was Promised, slightly polished compared to the one posted in help-gnu-emacs[1]. I know that debbugs.el does not make it easy[2], but it'd be nice if the rationale (the bit between the summary line and the changelog entries) made it into the final commit message. It's not essential, since I added an explanatory comment to the code so that one can find the rationale without reaching for the changelog, but the proposed commit message also provides further references if needed. Again, thanks for your time. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-Avoid-fonts-with-incomplete-coverage-of-MATHEMATICAL.patch >From 73d82879c3516444888ec613a72fa27119fd7851 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?K=C3=A9vin=20Le=20Gouguec?= Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 23:32:28 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Avoid fonts with incomplete coverage of MATHEMATICAL chars Some fonts include glyphs for MATHEMATICAL SCRIPT CAPITAL codepoints (#x1D49C-#x1D4B5) but not for MATHEMATICAL SCRIPT SMALL codepoints (#x1D4B6-#x1D4CF), see e.g. KpMath[1]. 'script-representative-chars' must thus include both CAPITAL and SMALL codepoints to ensure that we filter those fonts out. Bug#51495; discussed in help-gnu-emacs[2]. [1] https://mirrors.ctan.org/fonts/kpfonts-otf/doc/unimath-kpfonts.pdf [2] <878s02u5m6.fsf@gmail.com> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2021-09/msg00150.html * lisp/international/fontset.el (setup-default-fontset): Include both ends of each sub-range in 'script-representative-chars'. --- lisp/international/fontset.el | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/international/fontset.el b/lisp/international/fontset.el index fcd22e09d2..7c3a7cd1a9 100644 --- a/lisp/international/fontset.el +++ b/lisp/international/fontset.el @@ -816,11 +816,16 @@ setup-default-fontset (#x1D7EC #x1D7F5 mathematical-sans-serif-bold) (#x1D7F6 #x1D7FF mathematical-monospace))) (let ((slot (assq (nth 2 math-subgroup) script-representative-chars))) + ;; Add both ends of each subgroup to help filter out some + ;; incomplete fonts, e.g. those that cover MATHEMATICAL SCRIPT + ;; CAPITAL glyphs but not MATHEMATICAL SCRIPT SMALL ones. (if slot - (if (vectorp (cdr slot)) - (setcdr slot (vconcat (cdr slot) (vector (car math-subgroup)))) - (setcdr slot (vector (cadr slot) (car math-subgroup)))) - (setq slot (list (nth 2 math-subgroup) (car math-subgroup))) + (setcdr slot (append (list (nth 0 math-subgroup) + (nth 1 math-subgroup)) + (cdr slot))) + (setq slot (list (nth 2 math-subgroup) + (nth 0 math-subgroup) + (nth 1 math-subgroup))) (nconc script-representative-chars (list slot)))) (set-fontset-font "fontset-default" -- 2.33.0 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [1] Added an explanatory comment; used nth consistently instead of car/cadr/nth to make the logic more obvious. (pcase-dolist would make it even more obvious; should I send a followup patch or would that be overkill?) [2] One of the many reasons it took me=E2=80=A6 gee, more than a month? to = post this patch, is my (on-and-off, still ongoing) attempt to teach debbugs-gnu.el to keep this rationale, since it's been stripped from my previous patches[3][4][5]. It's slow going, mostly because I go back and forth between a "conservative" approach (introducing a variable similar to debbugs-gnu-patch-subject) and an "impotent rage" approach (=C2=AB Why not just call git am?? I made the patch with format-patch, like CONTRIBUTE says; why are we even parsing it?! Is this our lot? Did we fly too close to the sun and burn our wings? Must we toil endlessly, craft regexp after regexp, until the trumpets blow and sweet armageddon delivers us from the cycle of re-search-forward? What am I (looking-at)? Hath (eobp) finally come? (forward-line) I go, forever more, UNTIL THE FIRE OF A THOUSAND "^[*]" CLEANSES MY CURSED SOUL =C2=BB). [3] https://debbugs.gnu.org/35564#231 Compare with f8d8d28bc6. [4] https://debbugs.gnu.org/41810#26 (patch 1) Compare with elpa.git 01e7d1fe21. [5] And then there was bug#39504, although the "root cause" for this one was attaching more than one patch to a single message. --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 30 08:45:05 2021 Received: (at 51495) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2021 12:45:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56881 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mgnjN-0001zc-5L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 08:45:05 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57522) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mgnjK-0001vt-HC for 51495@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 08:45:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=D5QmriqJQyk1DpwVoQCl9anLvfTFuedUZm4o4ip6N3c=; b=LGutAKQQ3Vv2SAEHPaMC4g6GTW 5G17OVZEl9OotqOPVRSyFw++1VCeOyb8mIKi1PWfbrNURElSszj7JZ30oLcd8WF6Zusi3LOBJPq1E c0cps6frusHg1QuniKUGhay7hcnTQEPKBeNmFEiu6eDazys7b7A8f+B8B5ZP6ZXrqQSs=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mgnjC-0001NR-Ad; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 14:44:56 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec Subject: Re: bug#51495: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Avoid fonts with incomplete coverage of MATHEMATICAL chars References: <87fssjv7ag.fsf@gmail.com> <875ytfv75l.fsf@gmail.com> X-Now-Playing: Tyme's _To the Dawn_: "Don't Tell Me" Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 14:44:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <875ytfv75l.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec"'s message of "Fri, 29 Oct 2021 23:43:34 +0200") Message-ID: <87zgqqptq2.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Kévin Le Gouguec writes: > And the Patch That Was Promised, slightly polished compared to the one > posted in help-gnu-emacs[1]. Makes sense to me (and some light testing doesn't show any regressions here), so I've pushed it to the trunk. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51495 Cc: 51495@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) K=C3=A9vin Le Gouguec writes: > And the Patch That Was Promised, slightly polished compared to the one > posted in help-gnu-emacs[1]. Makes sense to me (and some light testing doesn't show any regressions here), so I've pushed it to the trunk. > I know that debbugs.el does not make it easy[2], but it'd be nice if the > rationale (the bit between the summary line and the changelog entries) > made it into the final commit message. Done. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 30 08:45:10 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2021 12:45:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56884 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mgnjS-00026t-C7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 08:45:10 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57536) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mgnjO-0001w9-Va for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 08:45:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=R1OM/vQlkr9TiVEvinFY0jDF/qZzngD8TjHAlXV6sHY=; b=PgOhcMM74spfhTG5VHWJVO9yMB c8DUL72xAtk5DjHstLrhs7etYZdEkPIinjPW4S0UsgBPpPV9+x0jFzKVLAGvP4gjxRzbrmywmXS9F rfKYZyOlcB3ViVx3bywLlvcBMZ9o7bwCahprXIhXgh45Aigb7/EqSBZ9dn65N5ToUm+8=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mgnjH-0001NZ-Dg for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 14:45:01 +0200 Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 14:44:59 +0200 Message-Id: <87y26aptpw.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #51495 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 51495 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 51495 29.1 quit From unknown Thu Aug 21 14:54:40 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator