GNU bug report logs - #51492
Request to use GNU guix reproducibility bugs data for research project | University of Waterloo

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Muhammad Hassan <muhammad.hassan <at> uwaterloo.ca>

Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 19:28:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 51492 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 51492 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#51492; Package guix. (Fri, 29 Oct 2021 19:28:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Muhammad Hassan <muhammad.hassan <at> uwaterloo.ca>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 29 Oct 2021 19:28:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Muhammad Hassan <muhammad.hassan <at> uwaterloo.ca>
To: "bug-guix <at> gnu.org" <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Request to use GNU guix reproducibility bugs data for research
 project | University of Waterloo
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:48:36 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,

I hope you are doing well.

I would like to scrap reproducibility bugs data from the linked website to use in my research project that is being conducted at the University of Waterloo. I am a Master's student.

The project aims to provide automated support for non-reproducibility detection.

Please tell me if there is an API that I can use to scrap the data.

https://issues.guix.gnu.org/
Guix issue tracker<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/>
Guix issue tracker. This is a web frontend to the Guix patch and bug trackers. Send email to guix-patches <at> gnu.org to submit a patch, or email bug-guix <at> gnu.org to submit a bug report.
issues.guix.gnu.org



Regards,

Muhammad Hassan
M.Math (Computer Science) || University of Waterloo

[https://uwaterloo.ca/brand/sites/ca.brand/files/styles/body-500px-wide/public/uploads/images/logo-vertical-.jpg?itok=rBgJ8S9H]

(+1) 548 994 4717 / LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/muhammad1hassan>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Added tag(s) notabug. Request was from zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 02 Nov 2021 11:50:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug closed, send any further explanations to 51492 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Muhammad Hassan <muhammad.hassan <at> uwaterloo.ca> Request was from zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 02 Nov 2021 11:50:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#51492; Package guix. (Wed, 03 Nov 2021 07:00:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #12 received at 51492 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: Muhammad Hassan <muhammad.hassan <at> uwaterloo.ca>
Cc: bug-guix <at> gnu.org, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>,
 51492 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#51492: Request to use GNU guix reproducibility bugs data
 for research project | University of Waterloo
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 07:12:09 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Muhammad,

[CCing Christopher Baines, who may skip straight to the last 
paragraph because they're probably busy building cool stuff.]

Good luck in your research.

Muhammad Hassan 写道:
> Please tell me if there is an API that I can use to scrap the 
> data.
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/

Hm, are you sure that our bug tracker is at all useful here?  I 
doubt it!  There are a relative handful of ‘foo isn't 
reproducible’ bugs but they're the opposite of comprehensive or 
standardised.  There are no categories nor labels nor automated 
closings when an issue is fixed.

I think what you really want is this[0] (source: [1]).

Mouth-watering indeed!

One problem: the Package Reproducibility page is gone :-(  I'm 
surprised: it was still there a few months ago.  Christopher, is 
this deliberate?  If so, is there any way we could help bring it 
back?  Is the historical data safe and is new data still tracked?

Kind regards,

T G-R

[0]: 
https://guix.gnu.org/static/blog/img/data-guix-patches-package-reproducibility.png
[1]: 
https://guix.gnu.org/eo/blog/2020/introduction-to-the-guix-data-service-the-missing-blog-post
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#51492; Package guix. (Wed, 03 Nov 2021 07:01:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:24:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 262 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.