GNU bug report logs - #51466
guix shell --check reports missing PKG_CONFIG_PATH on Debian bookworm

Previous Next

Full log

Message #87 received at 51466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>, Chris Marusich
 <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 53355 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 51466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#53355: guix shell --check: confusing error message
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 12:33:37 +0200

Hello everyone, 

Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be> writes:

> Chris Marusich schreef op za 25-06-2022 om 09:52 [-0700]:
>> [...]
>> the problem was that I could not control Guile's choice
>> of
>> file descriptors.  Guile chose file descriptor 19 for one end of the
>> pipe, and I don't know how to make it use anything else.  If we can
>> arrange for Guile to consistently use file descriptor 7, for example,
>> then probably it would work in all the shell I've tested.
> Have a look at ‘(guile)Ports and File Descriptors’.  It has lots of
> procedures for duplicating and renumbering.  That's fragile though, you
> might accidentally overwrite an fd that's being used for something
> else.

Just my 2¢, from my experience, Guile uses a lot of fds (`guile -q` uses
15).  I'm not sure it would be safe or advisable to move fds, since we
cannot be sure that they're backing ports or not, and if they're not it
would break things.  In general, the Guile ports/fds interface works ok,
but there is a lot of code that is fragile and doesn't handle
edge-cases.

Best,
-- 
Josselin Poiret

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.