Subject: bug#51451: image-transform-original has a misleading name

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:14:05 +0200

Stefan Kangas <[email-masked]> writes:

> Perhaps this would be less confusing if these commands were named
> `image-display-*' instead of `image-transform-*'?
>
>     s 0             image-display-reset-size
>     s b             image-display-fit-both
>     s f             image-mode-fit-frame
>     s h             image-display-fit-to-height
>     s m             image-display-set-smoothing
>     s o             image-display-original-size
>     s r             image-display-set-rotation
>     s s             image-display-set-scale
>     s w             image-display-fit-to-width
>
> Doesn't that make more sense?

It makes sense to me -- I've been confused by these commands myself.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no