Subject: bug#51451: image-transform-original has a misleading name

From: Stefan Kangas <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:52:43 -0400

close 51451 29.1
thanks

Juri Linkov <[email-masked]> writes:

>>> image-transform-* commands are modifying the values of
>>> image-transform-* variables.
>>> Would you propose to rename variables as well?
>>
>> I didn't think about that, as the commands are what the user will see.
>> Maybe we should.  Do you think it would be a good idea?
>
> At least, currently there is consistency in naming of
> image-transform-* functions and variables.  Whether
> selecting such a prefix was a good choice is another question.
>
> But if you see a problem only in the name of image-transform-original,
> then it could be renamed to image-transform-set-original or maybe
> better to image-transform-reset-to-original, i.e. to something more
> descriptive, while keeping the existing name prefix.
>
> PS: renaming to image-transform-reset-to-original will also require
> renaming image-transform-reset to image-transform-reset-to-initial.

Thanks.  I've now changed this as you suggest (commit 37fe0cd358).