From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:26:54 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#51409 <51409@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#51409 <51409@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 29.0.50; Basic erts functionality seems to be broken Reply-To: bug#51409 <51409@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 03:26:54 +0000 retitle 51409 29.0.50; Basic erts functionality seems to be broken reassign 51409 emacs submitter 51409 akater severity 51409 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 26 07:21:39 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Oct 2021 11:21:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45272 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mfKWR-0001qN-Gq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 07:21:39 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:41992) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mfKWQ-0001qE-2S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 07:21:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35792) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfKWO-00009g-BX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 07:21:37 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::530]:46709) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfKWM-00010A-2s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 07:21:36 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id z20so12728074edc.13 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 04:21:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=51rKhJxr35kJzi61voS/AtwodP44kfs7xnXz1pI6bMo=; b=pw/cigfUM156/EWVTrnA2oVzAXnnbHfX0QdQrKjPoKrvoW6c6UbeGjGjvQXQx3SAtr rfpmFIiW1sM3lQuh7B5+xOZEdZioqrhX7TZqcLeRd9FQ4j3RtfTnFy8Fyw0UYHUOjXh9 TGSZfxJ65+Ouuw/CD4skLhEGs3MIitFRo+qPpEzdzU+FgOQZaAQUK2XHDSV55S9oLw5e A7ORCQtwTgGsYOOwJa1Uzi58gu8xUNpwDUCyRdE5/mRyd9RcKN6+a+Zkxdli+Bq8tNmx BuV++ZdB4tLVZ/u8dW5WyiMlDLXyF+DvBd6o0WDVW4/UWWi+L2amofy04J1uIpv069QV YocA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=51rKhJxr35kJzi61voS/AtwodP44kfs7xnXz1pI6bMo=; b=OA4jphDponTOj7C++zFCKSgOWBq/4M0+4Big6UfUrT5/0rlIf9dj0RlFnMr3NG9vFr veihBH1ROO7nbbodoG6aGsA/cTRBHVOhScV5q1PwV2EcrMv8/UfkyaczAiVNoQpI8c0A SPbLeKjccBC8krp3Gzq3rTi19z9WEWEcTcrWC3/zFBWhQWpzG01ar5rc/3c+L/Lc9G2e X4DTqt3czAgA0X0nB7F+f99rmDhYf6g0zXW08eP2q09jehPXqHWbq0p4wfeB8rvgC88A jsT9F1d24LYv2pc+lXYrbX4KXb7fKdndxfQOJj9bAfiqD+uVHG7dgLRhDEax83kupzaD FPxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531qcc5ryvfJv0ij6ce8UdCgx82heest2JUhCYfOfByi1gcwEU/i 2xBuGtacJmgxNAZex8ujTnB6tP5ML+U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyZMH+y8y03X4DsNNv3TQM7S6MxDVN3He2Ej+fyx7fn6x68QNyKcPsYyDrD2jnPq/E6Lt5amg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3f17:: with SMTP id hq23mr29444066ejc.312.1635247291592; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 04:21:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([185.31.175.240]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id yd8sm4309090ejb.33.2021.10.26.04.21.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 26 Oct 2021 04:21:31 -0700 (PDT) From: akater To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 29.0.50; Basic erts functionality seems to be broken Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:09:58 +0000 Message-ID: <87h7d4dou1.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::530; envelope-from=nuclearspace@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x530.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) I can't make some basic erts tests work; this looks like an erts bug. In the following file, the specified result of the first test is what you'd see in a emacs-lisp-mode buffer. When the test is run, you don't get this result. Furthermore, load the following file in emacs -Q and run (ert-run-tests-interactively t). I observe, on the recent build from master, that the /resulting/ after- string is different depending on what the /specified/ after- string was, which certainly should not happen. This is true in two instances of Emacs built with vastly different settings so I omitted Emacs build details. ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (require 'ert) (require 'ert-x) (with-current-buffer (find-file-noselect "/tmp/erts-tests.erts") (erase-buffer) (insert "Name: erts-with-basic-newline Code: (lambda () (emacs-lisp-mode) (newline nil t)) Point-Char: | No-Before-Newline: t No-After-Newline: t =-= (whatever| =-= (whatever | =-=-= ") (save-buffer)) (ert-deftest my-erts-tests () (ert-test-erts-file (ert-resource-file "/tmp/erts-tests.erts"))) (with-current-buffer (find-file-noselect "/tmp/erts-tests-with-garbage.erts") (erase-buffer) (insert "Name: erts-with-basic-newline-and-garbabe Code: (lambda () (emacs-lisp-mode) (newline nil t)) Point-Char: | No-Before-Newline: t No-After-Newline: t =-= (whatever| =-= (whatever should-not-be-here | =-=-= ") (save-buffer)) (ert-deftest my-erts-tests-with-garbage () (ert-test-erts-file (ert-resource-file "/tmp/erts-tests-with-garbage.erts"))) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 27 10:14:38 2021 Received: (at 51409) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2021 14:14:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50109 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mfjhO-0002ru-Oq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:14:38 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52210) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mfjhM-0002rZ-Ag for 51409@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:14:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Mt1OYsY+QtTbmNURhjCPoBA3VuyzRZ5o7MQ8x9HoHu4=; b=DXdCS9bu/AnMRk7n+mHYZELFHh N9NEC3Ibl9BaOpxPFOwJwVfrfaJO5xsYQe3o9NRn+EkhV8Pvm3R6bIu+pTnc2Ov9kRjgDapQEZnw+ pcPbY/WGCbJvfGTygmBbgSaOwI9jfTH+qI84v9owyK41o+nXd2ykQV7RPfqsayWJmZtU=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfjhD-0006Rv-Jc; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:14:30 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: akater Subject: Re: bug#51409: 29.0.50; Basic erts functionality seems to be broken References: <87h7d4dou1.fsf@gmail.com> X-Now-Playing: Tyme's _To the Dawn_: "Morning Light (Klute Remix)" Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:14:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87h7d4dou1.fsf@gmail.com> (akater's message of "Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:09:58 +0000") Message-ID: <87a6iua725.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: akater writes: > I can't make some basic erts tests work; this looks like an erts bug. This should now be fixed. Both issues were due to the same issue -- the erts parser interpreting the "after" bit as a new test. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51409 Cc: 51409@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) akater writes: > I can't make some basic erts tests work; this looks like an erts bug. This should now be fixed. Both issues were due to the same issue -- the erts parser interpreting the "after" bit as a new test. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 27 10:14:47 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2021 14:14:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50112 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mfjhT-0002sA-Vt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:14:47 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52224) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mfjhR-0002rl-Sa for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:14:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=pZe3b6eigXyHvBthTOEykdB8v/OGlugwwiifz4uRnj8=; b=HBF6RJavTqUQ3kWiteIiYojdvZ FZ/5jfQgIqyGH4+zdew6/M7wXQD3TT1QR3q2OTC1kNiDp5bvObKpJL1Tm5N5ZowJE88XHAzbQ8Exx 9MWifjJ1Aoy2D41x89XdKPdGhDw8mGf51YMUeEO/Ofc/YpmlePcx9Mt/DtIvY1hTe5cQ=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfjhJ-0006S2-Ot for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:14:36 +0200 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:14:33 +0200 Message-Id: <878ryea71y.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #51409 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 51409 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 51409 29.1 quit From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:26:54 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator