From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:26:07 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#51308 <51308@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#51308 <51308@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 29.0.50; A number of tests fail with AOT Reply-To: bug#51308 <51308@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 17:26:07 +0000 retitle 51308 29.0.50; A number of tests fail with AOT reassign 51308 emacs submitter 51308 Lars Ingebrigtsen severity 51308 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 20 14:21:01 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2021 18:21:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55403 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mdGCz-0003J4-6g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:21:01 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47884) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mdGCy-0003Ix-Dk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:21:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mdGCv-0000nD-Nr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:21:00 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:39712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mdGCo-0002Gr-Gn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:20:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+044KgNJFvxEcnUNmLfNQSYUJKQo+7TpdUclOlQAEFs=; b=BpRDarePRrXDibYwGcZwpHdhcq kNgUcTkybii5E07mEogkt/IA20feivObyPNcYUD8uu1vlPjM5wsSpNJulxfwj+S0BHNvPR/AogSiQ TTTtACNEvAvujzQboz+67I4+5RYAdBWB7TsTAPGHcWEdHKWiNWyapwabVWlD99pgMcE4=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mdGCi-0001eL-NS; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 20:20:47 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 29.0.50; A number of tests fail with AOT X-Now-Playing: Juana Molina's _Segundo_: "Sonamos" Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 20:20:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87o87jlfr7.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: With NATIVE_FULL_AOT=1 make -j16 bootstrap a number of tests fail: Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Andrea Corallo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) With NATIVE_FULL_AOT=1 make -j16 bootstrap a number of tests fail: SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ----------------------- Files examined: 375 Ran 5645 tests, 5513 results as expected, 8 unexpected, 124 skipped 5 files contained unexpected results: lisp/net/socks-tests.log lisp/loadhist-tests.log lisp/hi-lock-tests.log lisp/emacs-lisp/ert-tests.log lisp/calendar/todo-mode-tests.log I have not tried to debug this further, but a cursory look at the backtraces seems to suggest the failures might have something to do with redefining functions -- but that's just a guess. In GNU Emacs 29.0.50 (build 39, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.30, cairo version 1.16.0) of 2021-10-20 built on elva Repository revision: 62591c164cd6d0b0555e11b160ffa81bd3bb010f Repository branch: master Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12011000 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 20 14:28:04 2021 Received: (at 51308) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2021 18:28:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55425 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mdGJn-0003VZ-Uh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:28:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48572) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mdGJm-0003Ug-7R for 51308@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:28:02 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50548) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mdGJe-00013t-Kb; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:27:55 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1301 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mdGJe-0000F6-7f; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:27:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 21:28:07 +0300 Message-Id: <83lf2na6vc.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87o87jlfr7.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 20 Oct 2021 20:20:44 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#51308: 29.0.50; A number of tests fail with AOT References: <87o87jlfr7.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51308 Cc: 51308@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 20:20:44 +0200 > Cc: Andrea Corallo > > Files examined: 375 > Ran 5645 tests, 5513 results as expected, 8 unexpected, 124 skipped > 5 files contained unexpected results: > lisp/net/socks-tests.log > lisp/loadhist-tests.log > lisp/hi-lock-tests.log > lisp/emacs-lisp/ert-tests.log > lisp/calendar/todo-mode-tests.log > > I have not tried to debug this further, but a cursory look at the > backtraces seems to suggest the failures might have something to do with > redefining functions -- but that's just a guess. Code that redefines functions which are in *.eln files should disable native-compilation. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 20 23:04:56 2021 Received: (at 51308) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2021 03:04:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55824 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mdONz-0005xE-Sa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 23:04:56 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54090) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mdONx-0005wz-Vd for 51308@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 23:04:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dU8I3r97Xi0AS3E+Gy8emii+Qk6vWQUhbzrRJEfo32E=; b=D53QfJ9EJqqevWJ8LUQX3egoC6 UGYTozy94oHO2Qgpk0TwJnzSgL3zkBb0T3Bv/gz8Mj+k70JQ/CAqPZUVswfawPdSdv7mItp0T4bLa sTv6Tz3VQU3T7TEidPmoIwM/mIEOwjyoawFq7W2OHc7TiPBGwT2BNEW37gWnm2UpGl/g=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mdONp-0005Lx-0y; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 05:04:47 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#51308: 29.0.50; A number of tests fail with AOT References: <87o87jlfr7.fsf@gnus.org> <83lf2na6vc.fsf@gnu.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEVPSZeWZJemqNJL J1z///9SRQkfAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+UKFQIpL0s56UEAAAGPSURBVDjLbZSLscQg CEUhNCDaQLQCMvTf2+OjxrxZd3Ym4Xj5KQGYC0euDt9Vx/hJLrdwQef3P0EBIAU28gG3kIo9EIzB rx19u9uRtB5hmMFIahAOZ6blQupLsFxbcnXT6FwCVJdk3MhNN3HJnTWUWsJGlrAKwwQ4kIm2QtG2 JmAuoseyrVm9RYA0ccSy8lclkuBJINahFIDSAhx5LVB0ecp6eEaHFXuBiydYuU5XigvsRPlJgLMp /tIOhWBEVwfUngTN0y2zEENmonDl4I1BCitGlF4DqFeC4WQW+CyFvWOYnieB7QQJ8laSp+iORK3C CaZCKADtyj1IKCRC03FKloGhTFXgPFdz1xLQihBZ+b9MyeyVX604QQfyAsQAD5PYnZx2v7NeYfMm MkF7ARa2wejooDxlhSDB7rPUvWPWDLvx6/bwqDFrzN3bvyUQs2fAf7UJvKD7dA5r8jBwjCDWmOde HZUDQO3pzZPjE1zDNlcrxgfwlOD+MNi9+fja34zPd+ElHX6v63iWEyDti/wHpVlir3d8zIMAAAAl dEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMTAtMjFUMDI6NDE6NDYrMDA6MDDcWq4VAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRl Om1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTEwLTIxVDAyOjQxOjQ2KzAwOjAwrQcWqQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Alice Coltrane's _Kirtan Turiya Sings_: "Charanam" Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 05:04:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83lf2na6vc.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 20 Oct 2021 21:28:07 +0300") Message-ID: <87pmrzhycz.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Code that redefines functions which are in *.eln files should disable > native-compilation. Isn't it possible to flet natively compiled functions? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51308 Cc: 51308@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: > Code that redefines functions which are in *.eln files should disable > native-compilation. Isn't it possible to flet natively compiled functions? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 21 00:20:49 2021 Received: (at 51308) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2021 04:20:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56028 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mdPZQ-00064w-Ux for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:20:49 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54910) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mdPZP-00064j-N9 for 51308@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:20:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=By+M+rWB0y2RuS7i301Z7lHJ1NAV+N8xKLFWtU0ahgk=; b=kME0XRs2oCv/dX0Qm1hUzXP64h rtCiMQI+h9gNHkaSVD5xlHXKJwZBiTS/nvEN3tDJ30BVUs6ijCEzyzSun+f+7Xb2joltcqjXmapsC 050tSU+KvFtmzxuGi91St5sB5qRTDxdr9yMIzqAK+sVQGFtsyFSsdIejxMkelQtLlnAs=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mdPZE-0005tu-Ez; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 06:20:39 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: 51308@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#51308: 29.0.50; A number of tests fail with AOT References: <87o87jlfr7.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Sylvester's _Sylvester-Step II_: "I Tried To Forget You" Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 06:20:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87o87jlfr7.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 20 Oct 2021 20:20:44 +0200") Message-ID: <87o87jgga3.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > 5 files contained unexpected results: > lisp/net/socks-tests.log This is now fixed. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51308 Cc: Andrea Corallo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > 5 files contained unexpected results: > lisp/net/socks-tests.log This is now fixed. > lisp/loadhist-tests.log This is a bug-ish. If dired isn't natively-compiled: (locate-file "dired" load-path (get-load-suffixes)) => "/home/larsi/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/dired.elc" But if it is, then we return the .el file instead: (locate-file "dired" load-path (get-load-suffixes)) => "/home/larsi/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/dired.el" But load-history has: ("/home/larsi/src/emacs/emacs-28/lisp/dired.elc" Which means that we can't find the .elc file by looking into load-history based on locate-file. Returning the .elc file would fix this, but I don't know what other repercussions there might be. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 21 00:31:38 2021 Received: (at 51308) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2021 04:31:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56038 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mdPju-0006N1-84 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:31:38 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54960) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mdPjs-0006Mk-GD for 51308@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:31:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=IDSGMHpU6ebsWP1pKgaLFEKAnbzFn2jcTD5yQV9Inzo=; b=rCC4IXgxLdWc8Hyj7NG26yOCWo T1gLZmD1cYcH0tTpebk770LsyowtmHsxvtOIeWpj/tz8bM1w5CBDyvxqBa5U7UqFP7YWEHVPB511J UxmbogrpItc0CBn9hJJNeLDrsVyti282ViyN6/RcRrXJEIG0pd2LcyR/nYbvch0JCBXo=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mdPji-00061v-W6; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 06:31:29 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: 51308@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#51308: 29.0.50; A number of tests fail with AOT References: <87o87jlfr7.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Sylvester's _Sylvester-Step II_: "Down, Down, Down" Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 06:31:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87o87jlfr7.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 20 Oct 2021 20:20:44 +0200") Message-ID: <87k0i7gfs1.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Files examined: 375 > Ran 5645 tests, 5513 results as expected, 8 unexpected, 124 skipped > 5 files contained unexpected results: > lisp/net/socks-tests.log > lisp/loadhist-tests.log > lisp/hi-lock- [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51308 Cc: Andrea Corallo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Files examined: 375 > Ran 5645 tests, 5513 results as expected, 8 unexpected, 124 skipped > 5 files contained unexpected results: > lisp/net/socks-tests.log > lisp/loadhist-tests.log > lisp/hi-lock-tests.log > lisp/emacs-lisp/ert-tests.log > lisp/calendar/todo-mode-tests.log I've now fixed > lisp/hi-lock-tests.log > lisp/calendar/todo-mode-tests.log which were about wrong number of parameters (which native-comp is more strict about) when redefining functions. > lisp/emacs-lisp/ert-tests.log is about (backtrace-frame-fun (car (ert-test-failed-backtrace result))) => ert-fail (car (ert-test-failed-backtrace result)) => #s(backtrace-frame t ert-fail ("foo") nil ((debugger-may-continue . t) (inhibit-redisplay) (inhibit-debugger . t) (inhibit-changing-match-data)) nil nil) while it's `signal' when ert isn't natively compiled. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 27 08:06:28 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2021 13:06:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33189 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqxPQ-0005G4-LX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 08:06:28 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33706) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqxPO-0005Fr-OK for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 08:06:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=8OTnRulMVRWySrfwpUDHxey0ueqrUQSluElmnXnKLJY=; b=eCESv6YwbPRnWl8/0rehJ+bkV9 Qs+jJpSSfs5GNfNVB44DENhcRu02nROcNm8n+YWuQLHlyMFzBsQJdTxiRbpJi67wST05stRFmSCl1 Ixqq5OzoWeKXieh9c/q9ZpbvnLnacqdkW81sDc6KK5X7WGWUQR2kQtwQAjTgegDPJmdE=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mqxPG-0007IG-Qq for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:06:21 +0100 Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:06:16 +0100 Message-Id: <87bl25sq7r.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #52138 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: forcemerge 52138 51308 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) forcemerge 52138 51308 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 12 16:33:11 2022 Received: (at 51308) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2022 21:33:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40950 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nT9MN-0003UU-C9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 16:33:11 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:53134) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nT9MK-0003UD-Ug; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 16:33:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Mqmkw3Nb2NHvTHJlsA26YUc+ebO+qGTYa0L14TH559k=; b=JLoQzoFuDP/TnT7MwRPpGINvfZ +r+OLxS0HrOHUw/5bBCJtcEwTq4WwO9xb3DxuAHPas3OUpYxnnBrA8xviDTgs1wEmo4f9nhoJu32X kMxTzrWGkuLTfQVpOpudSzcQlIRAsOEwArHtyjhuYKRPA6mUBe6oXrtHQk6KCmvKS+Vc=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nT9MC-0003lK-6L; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 22:33:02 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: 51308@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#52138: 29.0.50; Some tests fail on emba when run with native compilation References: <87o87jlfr7.fsf@gnus.org> <87o87jgga3.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 22:32:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87o87jgga3.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 21 Oct 2021 06:20:36 +0200") Message-ID: <87pmmqyhyu.fsf_-_@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > This is a bug-ish. If dired isn't natively-compiled: > > (locate-file "dired" load-path (get-load-suffixes)) > => "/home/larsi/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/dired.elc" > > But if it is, then we return the .e [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51308 Cc: 52138@debbugs.gnu.org, Andrea Corallo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > This is a bug-ish. If dired isn't natively-compiled: > > (locate-file "dired" load-path (get-load-suffixes)) > => "/home/larsi/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/dired.elc" > > But if it is, then we return the .el file instead: > > (locate-file "dired" load-path (get-load-suffixes)) > => "/home/larsi/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/dired.el" > > But load-history has: > > ("/home/larsi/src/emacs/emacs-28/lisp/dired.elc" > > Which means that we can't find the .elc file by looking into > load-history based on locate-file. > > Returning the .elc file would fix this, but I don't know what other > repercussions there might be. I've now done this change (which fixes this test failure), and I don't see any other regressions, so I've pushed it to Emacs 29. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 12 16:42:26 2022 Received: (at 51308) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2022 21:42:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40959 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nT9VK-0003i8-HG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 16:42:26 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:53266) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nT9VI-0003ho-V5; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 16:42:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zd1jV9DO27omDye2BaM22DnR89RvLbLDRLQM7JIzk70=; b=W+gvIpijwS2j2fRvEC1a5ueU42 qS/0LTWWfGiB8yuaxx6GLmZXOpjK1oG1dhWbGvl+2DI6JKb2BcSjqp+NBSn7Q/IrRIqYBAQ3wOVFb pfsXViyaulkK4gZjfAdWzisqfa51Fg/FzRt7N1Dv1IwFtzFPtbGOXSDvFIm361bOztEw=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nT9V9-0003oR-KH; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 22:42:17 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: 51308@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#52138: 29.0.50; Some tests fail on emba when run with native compilation References: <87o87jlfr7.fsf@gnus.org> <87k0i7gfs1.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 22:42:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87k0i7gfs1.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 21 Oct 2021 06:31:26 +0200") Message-ID: <87lexeyhjd.fsf_-_@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > while it's `signal' when ert isn't natively compiled. I've now fixed this in the test, but it's not clear that that's the correct thing to do here. But at least this makes EMBA have one less failure. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51308 Cc: 52138@debbugs.gnu.org, Andrea Corallo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > while it's `signal' when ert isn't natively compiled. I've now fixed this in the test, but it's not clear that that's the correct thing to do here. But at least this makes EMBA have one less failure. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 12 16:42:30 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2022 21:42:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40962 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nT9VO-0003iU-Ne for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 16:42:30 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:53278) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nT9VN-0003hv-Cp for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 16:42:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+NI6hCddMkUuJkPxLmwsmApVQamJxH57SwVD/W5F/Vo=; b=KIcU1yMoQ1OAsE/OdOVV+84mFt +NIwCtuctkxchai4KPW7oW6Ij8DbRfmtHMvmarduJ5kiGEgQ5RHEi/yVIY5+oj1UArPo1fm6JYOIb p8GP5klcWi86wZd16QWh0OonaXypO2DZkpmgaqpmNMnr5JPFPWZEUX+r0Cnf3Zrd050w=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nT9VF-0003oc-OE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 22:42:23 +0100 Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 22:42:21 +0100 Message-Id: <87k0cyyhj6.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #52138 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 52138 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 52138 29.1 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 13 00:46:11 2022 Received: (at 51308) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2022 05:46:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41430 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTH3Q-0007v8-EE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:46:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43426) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTH3O-0007uS-KR; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:46:07 -0500 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=50986 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nTH3J-0007j1-0T; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:46:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=ifhpYQ8zDNqk2m8QkVmBswtPe4lAGANmDvZmEuObYTc=; b=G4eZRJAyEYzk KkQlfQbCC0xCgqF9ZpkPaEucPqwGyG/e7YdNUEnOwQc+xv3HdrjxvmHQggUE//uJ5W0JZV8wI1LqY w5PEMX9xZIdyf9pAY0qKbdl5rlquI+5xRmFJKFPhwQg8x2UKdfArq+oKo6koX/UFNrx5zi9Y5ejsa ktsbWIDM8fWmMQkWGFB7ECpAFA+mzCseqC9I6KBWqUzVlkXj2FdUVo8QyXb1zGOyoBGcbGaz+PdJJ YTUuMJr9rNFUX6Q+4WcJiIwGxgpcZZOs5orB/0jqSorHPIjXNcz6XlffcCX5jmAGBJ0zPwCv9Pb3w AVSBl4FzGywcG7ZGNeb/kA==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1203 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nTH3I-0002Hv-9Q; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:46:00 -0500 Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 07:45:43 +0200 Message-Id: <834k42mmm0.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87pmmqyhyu.fsf_-_@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sat, 12 Mar 2022 22:32:57 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#51308: bug#52138: 29.0.50; Some tests fail on emba when run with native compilation References: <87o87jlfr7.fsf@gnus.org> <87o87jgga3.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmmqyhyu.fsf_-_@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51308 Cc: 52138@debbugs.gnu.org, 51308@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 22:32:57 +0100 > Cc: 52138@debbugs.gnu.org, Andrea Corallo > > > Returning the .elc file would fix this, but I don't know what other > > repercussions there might be. > > I've now done this change (which fixes this test failure), and I don't > see any other regressions, so I've pushed it to Emacs 29. Did you check that loading a .elc file via load-library still triggers async native-compilation when there's no .eln file or it is not up-to-date with the .el file? And what about loading a .el or .elc file with an explicit extension -- that should NOT trigger native-compilation even if there's no up-to-date .eln file. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 13 10:15:09 2022 Received: (at 51308) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2022 14:15:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43081 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTP01-0003hc-IT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 10:15:09 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:59870) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTOzy-0003ga-Gz; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 10:15:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=JgkGBlnKrVKwwl8+h8hr/hQKDoD5HbmzsqcxCFHTOPE=; b=fDNmrzV/CBS4797XNkcEzpUVjs Xi2hvAgknNc4jcJ6/PIa5iyDYG5BGm5w/J+dG2lbK5dRlhMKJ21ctEJEWfc0+6jEZISH1tpIEq4gW OKjfYWUf45PS9FXtlDBKckL5LVBP6ZSmRnFKhDJc9oJLhipoDXNYJMW4c1LuawiJGu+w=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nTOzp-0003Ez-Go; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 15:14:59 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#51308: bug#52138: 29.0.50; Some tests fail on emba when run with native compilation References: <87o87jlfr7.fsf@gnus.org> <87o87jgga3.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmmqyhyu.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <834k42mmm0.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 15:14:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <834k42mmm0.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 13 Mar 2022 07:45:43 +0200") Message-ID: <87fsnmuefz.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Did you check that loading a .elc file via load-library still triggers > async native-compilation when there's no .eln file or it is not > up-to-date with the .el file? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51308 Cc: 52138@debbugs.gnu.org, 51308@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: > Did you check that loading a .elc file via load-library still triggers > async native-compilation when there's no .eln file or it is not > up-to-date with the .el file? Yes, I didn't see any noticeable difference before or after the patch in that regard. > And what about loading a .el or .elc > file with an explicit extension -- that should NOT trigger > native-compilation even if there's no up-to-date .eln file. Didn't try that. Let's see... if I do (load "~/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/battery.el") or (load "~/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/battery.elc") then no .eln compilation is started. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 13 12:41:21 2022 Received: (at 51308) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2022 16:41:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43160 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTRHV-0003Ja-Ne for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 12:41:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42412) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTRHT-0003JH-Em; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 12:41:20 -0400 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=57754 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nTRHO-0005gx-2K; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 12:41:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Eb3/iV5kjcsH16VynsX3JzF7rgf7X9msIRnWLUrGclE=; b=oIC8BGviZdkP b3eBAzPj+l6IBYqLPhRi9IW1/yIQMXxAQuSDDbYadskIOueNtLKEFqPWbbLlB2vwbbI+Vq4RSmIEO XwvklWkvaU5B71nm0PmPnyUg9RaJf+0MgGfgl0XauoVZxk5LTT4FYKX5lUARygBfVwScEOJKwXv9b eEZkYw23t/abiodmFG083xcFNpNJGmt6VPH2Us9JAOrpmnmSpdM7VXRByESmtT1W3PgGuicl8WQod 0loJBViOKb/iV/RrANZidTWFjQbZCwDZTn0daqt013JTIa/ad5n0FTOGEKT59CHFtOS+QC5wAMOiu 4RgoVG7NkwRfEj1D9PM+5A==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1825 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nTRHN-0004Lj-AQ; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 12:41:13 -0400 Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 18:40:58 +0200 Message-Id: <83r175ls9x.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87fsnmuefz.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 13 Mar 2022 15:14:56 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#51308: bug#52138: 29.0.50; Some tests fail on emba when run with native compilation References: <87o87jlfr7.fsf@gnus.org> <87o87jgga3.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmmqyhyu.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <834k42mmm0.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsnmuefz.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51308 Cc: 52138@debbugs.gnu.org, 51308@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 51308@debbugs.gnu.org, 52138@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org > Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 15:14:56 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > And what about loading a .el or .elc > > file with an explicit extension -- that should NOT trigger > > native-compilation even if there's no up-to-date .eln file. > > Didn't try that. Let's see... if I do > > (load "~/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/battery.el") > > or > > (load "~/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/battery.elc") > > then no .eln compilation is started. Great, that's the correct behavior. Thanks. From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:26:07 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator