From unknown Tue Aug 19 07:27:09 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#5127 <5127@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#5127 <5127@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Indentation of top level tags when no single top level tag Reply-To: bug#5127 <5127@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 14:27:09 +0000 retitle 5127 Indentation of top level tags when no single top level tag reassign 5127 emacs submitter 5127 Lennart Borgman severity 5127 minor thanks From lennart.borgman@gmail.com Fri Dec 4 15:18:08 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 4 Dec 2009 23:18:08 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=4.0 tests=AWL,FOURLA,FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8 autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nB4NI617006148 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 15:18:07 -0800 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NGhPZ-0007RE-LN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:18:05 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NGhPV-0007NE-VY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:18:05 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50140 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NGhPV-0007N0-N5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:18:01 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f196.google.com ([209.85.211.196]:33744) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NGhPV-0000R1-Bf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:18:01 -0500 Received: by ywh34 with SMTP id 34so2732143ywh.1 for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:18:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=CcgmSVF9NUH7OcM2vkPOl+kn+hgajLmT/f7BIryiV8U=; b=e3VtB5d+KFkfJUxzjOB1QqMaVreWXYMNUs/bBUSBbeFxbIqTmuQjeYa7n7dOu/SeZc 7XQc9lY0A3J6NL2eYUCJ/UulD8GNLlsaBiiuRK9/Miq3guOoTYgJNRJ+Ha5EpM2f2zE+ i0YbrBGGXkjAAfbAG1FZkAQ0X28AnkhQtCxFc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=iIJaB0WdyTCQRkPoxZq9MlwegpemVTiYsuyTaDbuMT393t/d9dkFbQdXIWHZWePMNe TF3OnEbnkp9vsY/5VpC4QV01JoeM+FQVKA84iJpaiSfb7R6pRgZqzDETq608XH6s4faZ py8SU60I44yDpyyccIRnnsby98yzYn2+36jKg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.111.20 with SMTP id o20mr4867661anm.185.1259968680405; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:18:00 -0800 (PST) From: Lennart Borgman Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 00:17:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Indentation of top level tags when no single top level tag To: Emacs Bugs Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001636ed74209fac2f0479ef51bf X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) --001636ed74209fac2f0479ef51bf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sometimes a user is working with part of a code and still want to do indentation. In cases like this the body tag will currently be intended to column 0 by sgml-indent-line. The attached patch handles this particular case specially to avoid that. Since I do not want to change the return values from sgml-geet-context (which is where this situation best can be detected) I have transferred the extra information in a global variable sgml-get-context-last-close instead. This is against a checkout from 2009-12-04. --001636ed74209fac2f0479ef51bf Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=US-ASCII; name="indent-outermost.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="indent-outermost.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_g2tkrtfz0 SW5kZXg6IHNnbWwtbW9kZS5lbA0KPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KUkNTIGZpbGU6IC9zb3VyY2VzL2VtYWNz L2VtYWNzL2xpc3AvdGV4dG1vZGVzL3NnbWwtbW9kZS5lbCx2DQpyZXRyaWV2aW5nIHJldmlzaW9u IDEuMTQ1DQpkaWZmIC1jIC1yMS4xNDUgc2dtbC1tb2RlLmVsDQoqKiogc2dtbC1tb2RlLmVsCTMx IE9jdCAyMDA5IDIxOjUyOjU2IC0wMDAwCTEuMTQ1DQotLS0gc2dtbC1tb2RlLmVsCTQgRGVjIDIw MDkgMjM6MDQ6MDYgLTAwMDANCioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKg0KKioqIDEyNjUsMTI3MCAqKioqDQot LS0gMTI2NSwxMjc0IC0tLS0NCiAgICAgICAgKGdvdG8tY2hhciB0YWctc3RhcnQpDQogICAgICAg IChzZ21sLW1ha2UtdGFnIHRhZy10eXBlIHRhZy1zdGFydCB0YWctZW5kIG5hbWUpKSkpDQogIA0K KyAoZGVmdmFyIHNnbWwtZ2V0LWNvbnRleHQtbGFzdC1jbG9zZSBuaWwNCisgICAiTGFzdCBjbG9z ZSB0YWcgc3RhcnQuDQorIE9ubHkgdXNlZCBmb3Igb3V0ZXJtb3N0IGxldmVsLiIpDQorIA0KICAo ZGVmdW4gc2dtbC1nZXQtY29udGV4dCAoJm9wdGlvbmFsIHVudGlsKQ0KICAgICJEZXRlcm1pbmUg dGhlIGNvbnRleHQgb2YgdGhlIGN1cnJlbnQgcG9zaXRpb24uDQogIEJ5IGRlZmF1bHQsIHBhcnNl IHVudGlsIHdlIGZpbmQgYSBzdGFydC10YWcgYXMgdGhlIGZpcnN0IHRoaW5nIG9uIGEgbGluZS4N CioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKg0KKioqIDEyODAsMTI5MSAqKioqDQogIAkoc3RhY2sgbmlsKQ0KICAJ KGlnbm9yZSBuaWwpDQogIAkoY29udGV4dCBuaWwpDQohIAl0YWctaW5mbykNCiAgICAgIDs7IENP TlRFWFQga2VlcHMgdHJhY2sgb2YgdGhlIHRhZy1zdGFjaw0KICAgICAgOzsgU1RBQ0sga2VlcHMg dHJhY2sgb2YgdGhlIGVuZCB0YWdzIHdlJ3ZlIHNlZW4gKGFuZCB0aHVzIHRoZSBzdGFydC10YWdz DQogICAgICA7OyAgIHdlJ2xsIGhhdmUgdG8gaWdub3JlKSB3aGVuIHNraXBwaW5nIG92ZXIgbWF0 Y2hpbmcgb3Blbi4uY2xvc2UgcGFpcnMuDQogICAgICA7OyBJR05PUkUgaXMgYSBsaXN0IG9mIHRh Z3MgdGhhdCBjYW4gYmUgaWdub3JlZCBiZWNhdXNlIHRoZXkgaGF2ZSBiZWVuDQogICAgICA7OyAg IGNsb3NlZCBpbXBsaWNpdGx5Lg0KICAgICAgKHNraXAtY2hhcnMtYmFja3dhcmQgIiBcdFxuIikg ICAgICA7IE1ha2Ugc3VyZSB3ZSdyZSBub3QgYXQgaW5kZW50YXRpb24uDQogICAgICAod2hpbGUN CiAgCShhbmQgKG5vdCAoZXEgdW50aWwgJ25vdykpDQotLS0gMTI4NCwxMjk4IC0tLS0NCiAgCShz dGFjayBuaWwpDQogIAkoaWdub3JlIG5pbCkNCiAgCShjb250ZXh0IG5pbCkNCiEgCXRhZy1pbmZv DQohICAgICAgICAgbGFzdC1jbG9zZSkNCiAgICAgIDs7IENPTlRFWFQga2VlcHMgdHJhY2sgb2Yg dGhlIHRhZy1zdGFjaw0KICAgICAgOzsgU1RBQ0sga2VlcHMgdHJhY2sgb2YgdGhlIGVuZCB0YWdz IHdlJ3ZlIHNlZW4gKGFuZCB0aHVzIHRoZSBzdGFydC10YWdzDQogICAgICA7OyAgIHdlJ2xsIGhh dmUgdG8gaWdub3JlKSB3aGVuIHNraXBwaW5nIG92ZXIgbWF0Y2hpbmcgb3Blbi4uY2xvc2UgcGFp cnMuDQogICAgICA7OyBJR05PUkUgaXMgYSBsaXN0IG9mIHRhZ3MgdGhhdCBjYW4gYmUgaWdub3Jl ZCBiZWNhdXNlIHRoZXkgaGF2ZSBiZWVuDQogICAgICA7OyAgIGNsb3NlZCBpbXBsaWNpdGx5Lg0K KyAgICAgOzsgTEFTVC1DTE9TRSBpcyBsYXN0IGNsb3NlIHRhZyB0aGF0IGNhbiBiZSB1c2VmdWwg Zm9yIGluZGVudGF0aW9uDQorICAgICA7OyAgIHdoZW4gb24gb3V0ZXJtb3N0IGxldmVsLg0KICAg ICAgKHNraXAtY2hhcnMtYmFja3dhcmQgIiBcdFxuIikgICAgICA7IE1ha2Ugc3VyZSB3ZSdyZSBu b3QgYXQgaW5kZW50YXRpb24uDQogICAgICAod2hpbGUNCiAgCShhbmQgKG5vdCAoZXEgdW50aWwg J25vdykpDQoqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioNCioqKiAxMzEyLDEzMTcgKioqKg0KLS0tIDEzMTksMTMy NyAtLS0tDQogIA0KICAgICAgICAgOzsgc3RhcnQtdGFnDQogICAgICAgICAoKGVxIChzZ21sLXRh Zy10eXBlIHRhZy1pbmZvKSAnb3BlbikNCisgICAgICAgICAod2hlbiAoYW5kIChudWxsIHN0YWNr KQ0KKyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgbGFzdC1jbG9zZSkNCisgICAgICAgICAgIChzZXRxIGxh c3QtY2xvc2UgJ25vLXVzZSkpDQogIAkoY29uZA0KICAJICgobnVsbCBzdGFjaykNCiAgCSAgKGlm IChhc3NvYy1zdHJpbmcgKHNnbWwtdGFnLW5hbWUgdGFnLWluZm8pIGlnbm9yZSB0KQ0KKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqDQoqKiogMTM1NCwxMzYzICoqKioNCi0tLSAxMzY0LDEzODkgLS0tLQ0KICAgICAg ICAgKChlcSAoc2dtbC10YWctdHlwZSB0YWctaW5mbykgJ2Nsb3NlKQ0KICAJKGlmIChzZ21sLWVt cHR5LXRhZy1wIChzZ21sLXRhZy1uYW1lIHRhZy1pbmZvKSkNCiAgCSAgICAobWVzc2FnZSAiU3B1 cmlvdXMgPC8lcz46IGVtcHR5IHRhZyIgKHNnbWwtdGFnLW5hbWUgdGFnLWluZm8pKQ0KKyAgICAg ICAgICAgOzsgS2VlcCB0cmFjayBvZiBsYXN0IGNsb3NlIGlmIGNvbnRleHQgd2lsbCByZXR1cm4g bmlsDQorICAgICAgICAgICAod2hlbiAoYW5kIChub3QgbGFzdC1jbG9zZSkNCisgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgKG51bGwgc3RhY2spDQorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICg+IGhlcmUg KHBvaW50LWF0LWVvbCkpDQorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIChsZXQgKChoZXJlIChwb2lu dCkpKQ0KKyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIChnb3RvLWNoYXIgKHNnbWwtdGFnLXN0YXJ0 IHRhZy1pbmZvKSkNCisgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAoc2tpcC1jaGFycy1iYWNrd2Fy ZCAiIFx0IikNCisgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAocHJvZzENCisgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKGJvbHApDQorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAoZ290by1j aGFyIGhlcmUpKSkpDQorICAgICAgICAgICAgIChzZXRxIGxhc3QtY2xvc2UgdGFnLWluZm8pKQ0K KyANCiAgCSAgKHB1c2ggKHNnbWwtdGFnLW5hbWUgdGFnLWluZm8pIHN0YWNrKSkpDQogICAgICAg ICApKQ0KICANCiAgICAgIDs7IHJldHVybiBjb250ZXh0DQorICAgICAoc2V0cSBzZ21sLWdldC1j b250ZXh0LWxhc3QtY2xvc2UNCisgICAgICAgICAgICh3aGVuIChhbmQgbGFzdC1jbG9zZQ0KKyAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAobm90IChlcSBsYXN0LWNsb3NlICduby11c2UpKSkNCisgICAg ICAgICAgICAgKHNnbWwtdGFnLXN0YXJ0IGxhc3QtY2xvc2UpKSkNCiAgICAgIGNvbnRleHQpKQ0K ICANCiAgKGRlZnVuIHNnbWwtc2hvdy1jb250ZXh0ICgmb3B0aW9uYWwgZnVsbCkNCioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKg0KKioqIDE1MDgsMTUxNCAqKioqDQogIAkgICAgICAoPCAocG9pbnQpIGhlcmUpIChz Z21sLWF0LWluZGVudGF0aW9uLXApKQ0KICAJIChjdXJyZW50LWNvbHVtbikpDQogIAkodA0KISAJ IChnb3RvLWNoYXIgdGhlcmUpDQogIAkgKCsgKGN1cnJlbnQtY29sdW1uKQ0KICAJICAgICgqIHNn bWwtYmFzaWMtb2Zmc2V0IChsZW5ndGggY29udGV4dCkpKSkpKSkNCiAgDQotLS0gMTUzNCwxNTQy IC0tLS0NCiAgCSAgICAgICg8IChwb2ludCkgaGVyZSkgKHNnbWwtYXQtaW5kZW50YXRpb24tcCkp DQogIAkgKGN1cnJlbnQtY29sdW1uKSkNCiAgCSh0DQohIAkgKGdvdG8tY2hhciAob3IgKGFuZCAo bnVsbCBjb250ZXh0KQ0KISAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHNnbWwtZ2V0LWNv bnRleHQtbGFzdC1jbG9zZSkNCiEgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgdGhlcmUpKQ0KICAJ ICgrIChjdXJyZW50LWNvbHVtbikNCiAgCSAgICAoKiBzZ21sLWJhc2ljLW9mZnNldCAobGVuZ3Ro IGNvbnRleHQpKSkpKSkpDQogIA0K --001636ed74209fac2f0479ef51bf-- From monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Fri Dec 4 21:04:29 2009 Received: (at 5127) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 5 Dec 2009 05:04:30 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.181]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nB554Sr1005224 for <5127@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 21:04:29 -0800 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAI94GUtFpZ7i/2dsb2JhbACBTNQghDMEihw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,346,1257138000"; d="scan'208,217";a="50733939" Received: from 69-165-158-226.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.165.158.226]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2009 00:04:23 -0500 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id F16B070213; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 00:04:22 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Lennart Borgman Cc: 5127@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#5127: Indentation of top level tags when no single top level tag Message-ID: References: Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:04:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sat, 5 Dec 2009 00:17:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Sometimes a user is working with part of a code and still want to do > indentation. In cases like this > > > > the body tag will currently be intended to column 0 by sgml-indent-line. What's wrong with that? Or do you mean it shoujld be indented to the same level as the preceding ? Stefan From lennart.borgman@gmail.com Sat Dec 5 01:50:09 2009 Received: (at 5127) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 5 Dec 2009 09:50:10 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mail-yx0-f190.google.com (mail-yx0-f190.google.com [209.85.210.190]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nB59o8Es030616 for <5127@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 01:50:09 -0800 Received: by yxe28 with SMTP id 28so2775101yxe.19 for <5127@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:50:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CTl+/CQXeFIIRLYWLF4I+cYqZPiIIj5MuQPuUHoVQe4=; b=vKfabpck3e0xL9zfwYpuNQj9pSjA+vlkbgLPDGYF86b7xY18qEo2ZlmOexXnYu9UEU MhWRrt63v8VJkwiF6Vk+En4WsFmuXfzi2taZcUpJTIsLz/K4FLa1x7BgwWoKWh6MHOA3 ORcAH7FkaleWL2KkwKXS4MOO7aIc849Fbi7SE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=P4hcY6rLLMrrYajvVEJ4uC1cAV5be8vRVh/vo0icfzzKSKWGbxFRlG+4gAwJaQ72YB GFBOELvuL78QYkhJ+b4KecljteZC6EcGsyNFVjrAZmIxVyIEv4LK01S4SF5hWkxycRXJ 0c1vFBJBTlYaljsIERSQ0peSKRmnOoSq4okvQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.181.21 with SMTP id i21mr4946685anp.141.1260006602098; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:50:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References:

From: Lennart Borgman Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 10:49:42 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#5127: Indentation of top level tags when no single top level tag To: Stefan Monnier Cc: 5127@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Stefan Monnier w= rote: >> Sometimes a user is working with part of a code and still want to do >> indentation. In cases like this > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 > >> the body tag will currently be intended to column 0 by sgml-indent-line. > > What's wrong with that? =C2=A0Or do you mean it shoujld be indented to th= e > same level as the preceding ? Yes. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 25 09:47:22 2020 Received: (at 5127) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2020 13:47:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60812 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kAZII-0001Vm-A8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:47:22 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41982) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kAZIG-0001Q5-NE for 5127@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:47:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7IAOSkoFOo7cdjz8Mzys8oSYM7IIFAUJBNWUG7XH/S0=; b=GF2BhLU4ZkLaAplzm7jesH98jM oubp2QQCFEJYIC5GwFumN+yj8bYSPyHfLTItO8+isqAv8TuJuPvIP/DitruS9gRyRgZ42I6oqXyI0 DxWDqwn74GS7lGJMPTy7IFzEZ6XYgNEQl9oJAqXCoNZqLCFSj51IEZzh++m3dFjbI64g=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kAZI7-0006GH-JH; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:47:14 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Lennart Borgman Subject: Re: bug#5127: Indentation of top level tags when no single top level tag References: X-Now-Playing: Various's _The Wire Tapper 53_: "Tolouse Low Trax - Jumping Dead Leafs" Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:47:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sat, 5 Dec 2009 00:17:40 +0100") Message-ID: <874koq96sh.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lennart Borgman writes: > Sometimes a user is working with part of a code and still want to do > indentation. In cases like this > > > > > > the body tag will currently be intended to column 0 by sgml-i [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5127 Cc: 5127@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lennart Borgman writes: > Sometimes a user is working with part of a code and still want to do > indentation. In cases like this > > > > > > the body tag will currently be intended to column 0 by sgml-indent-line. I put the example into a file called foo.sgml and hit TAB on the in Emacs 28, and the didn't move, so I'm guessing this has been fixed in the decade since this was reported? So I'm closing this bug report. If you're still seeing the problem, send a mail to the debbugs address and we'll reopen the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 25 09:47:27 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2020 13:47:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60815 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kAZIN-0001aD-HR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:47:27 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41996) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kAZIM-0001Ui-6u for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:47:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=g9VgDpF1yX4eU3yLSFuklf5URYL+n0gtkGT2hh/b9V8=; b=im0WVwJ9FYd4de3NtnmLGdXwE8 xS7CNBDAPpcSv2KSiFkZTAd4C8oo7R8earMe7ZhS45Qxa/nYE7wKdGJqHIBb3ttaYY7Y7e7JB5eFh RQWD8Dw3/xOGo05ycC/2tnzA2EYws3e6Y0ZjdnUItYoA/78o1IG6a3TJ7f1M5u9y0xLc=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kAZIE-0006GO-BR for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:47:20 +0200 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:47:17 +0200 Message-Id: <87364a96sa.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #5127 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 5127 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 5127 quit From unknown Tue Aug 19 07:27:09 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator