From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:21:49 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#51143 <51143@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#51143 <51143@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 29.0.50; Long delay after M-x commandname Reply-To: bug#51143 <51143@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 17:21:49 +0000 retitle 51143 29.0.50; Long delay after M-x commandname reassign 51143 emacs submitter 51143 Eduardo Ochs severity 51143 normal tag 51143 moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 11 22:45:33 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2021 02:45:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33094 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ma7nA-0002dF-26 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:45:33 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44448) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ma7n8-0002d5-0Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:45:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33256) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ma7n1-00055p-VE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:45:20 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::532]:42563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ma7mx-0008CE-Mc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:45:14 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id t16so53231217eds.9 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 19:45:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=w3lEmvJSDJuuPQOTeH5ynbBnemMYfbRoLZZhTtwIXxE=; b=FjeJpdOIQgIXq6PJj8zSr6iEdu2j1eTbrUvrP+/rGRsKNWcTnqOvxQrB+SyhgrG3tQ 78++Mk6646eZ+PGOozmCdx2lBnb5iDIXO4qmX8Udw/2hXfYyqeuErQdbXR9659RPSQGs piSqNZdgbHpK11vrMfvLwrVRK2uSqn24j+/CZasd7+4ZuZI45HGZyMeP64ijX3CYUSGX 0cDQWMijEBTKy/FvMNJ3gBhFXiMiuIedioVkhBeuCHkO571djcHrwRliAQi4Zr71g51m QWMAEA65agH51WbUs0iEAcTrGb9a9Em0tpl7PXop4YqYrLRKj5bmvX7ng3EYuSAe0oua taJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=w3lEmvJSDJuuPQOTeH5ynbBnemMYfbRoLZZhTtwIXxE=; b=LXjkfxM4F34ef0feN3toqMx3l430QPf2RoyqOSlWmTHieB8rBQqbRYy6FWKNJx1aJQ 3ThoLMUvrTYCu37p/6zqSFRuPMNj4PqkkhbadIR4lmVxLzq89JEfTbgB1iRAkeaO5AgS i7WCXtdS/bzwvP7LTfLv1axu1xUO/7mS16Up5vK2sG0b/O6mpTd3ZuXqLsDgTygEK9Ex Hgeff1opghBQXAO7G2zeqQdCJQhcSAibxZvpmQlwxuZN149qvQRNoWXwec/HEW7Ch9mo dPzceCc+yGZFMtieJPuUdZjuizmAToDm5LjAl5+fLbVLTzFNIXqV9M6Xq7HcF2NiNtAd /M0A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ejcM3lxcOpZoxOgwbqIkYinywtNoXGCeboTOUVimYfsF+Y/lo E5hBcRPfp0Zly6ver/TtaqDpDQQ/RClnjHjLKYqpfpLQFnQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2ZL/EUDMcLhvpH5/Xx/GRmL/mxvVoD7THKSrbMUmiS7VlqFMUGz95L2OqWKTainJokx6XwpFgrBrh+9fEIwA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d937:: with SMTP id rn23mr30507128ejb.101.1634006708689; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 19:45:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Eduardo Ochs Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 23:44:57 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: 29.0.50; Long delay after M-x commandname To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, Michael Heerdegen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::532; envelope-from=eduardoochs@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x532.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I noticed that when I was invoking commands with M-x commandname and using tab for completing parts of the name then sometimes there would be a long delay - sometimes as long as 10 seconds, but my laptop is quite old - between the RET and the execution of the command. This delay was big on emacs28 and practically imperceptible on emacs27, and it seemed that it was getting worse in more recent versions of emacs28/29. I discussed this on help-gnu-emacs before submitting a bug report. The main links are these ones: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2021-10/msg00232.html Edrx https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2021-10/msg00259.html MH https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2021-10/msg00261.html Edrx 2 https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2021-10/msg00265.html MH 2 Let me summarize. The part of "M-x commandname" that takes a long time is the call to `execute-extended-command--shorter' - like this: (execute-extended-command--shorter "find-eev-quick-intro" "find-eev-qui") Michael Heerdegen was able to reproduce the problem and profile it. See this message: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2021-10/msg00265.html MH 2 Cheers, Eduardo Ochs http://angg.twu.net/#eev In GNU Emacs 29.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.24, cairo version 1.16.0) of 2021-10-09 built on scylla Repository revision: cc202c713be60355dbcf4e5ea87603c5e16a92db Repository branch: master Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12011000 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) Configured using: 'configure --with-modules' (etc etc) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 12 08:56:55 2021 Received: (at 51143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2021 12:56:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36778 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1maHKx-000415-KQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:56:55 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38146) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1maHKv-00040j-6d for 51143@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:56:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=FgFajf/TSGr1BZiV5/LUyuwCX7heSF/yD+ncZ70gFh8=; b=aKD+Ikxl16GyzA43GBzjlAi5Ne qH2exXUUZbxVvh3SFtk1olN1Ri2BGuanHJ5wCF/hlL1AJAydGn7967pmKqTkSL8TV1Y58mD2uHnlI WU5LT/rV1Xx0fT3Oyul+UA4XlsRGfzoKr36FKsPRwSXG+OVZOppn+0vAAuvGnRWJU2qU=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1maHKk-00057m-JK; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 14:56:46 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eduardo Ochs Subject: Re: bug#51143: 29.0.50; Long delay after M-x commandname References: X-Now-Playing: The Body and BIG-BRAVE's _Leaving None But Small Birds_: "Blackest Crow" Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 14:56:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Eduardo Ochs's message of "Mon, 11 Oct 2021 23:44:57 -0300") Message-ID: <87ee8qcsfr.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eduardo Ochs writes: > Let me summarize. The part of "M-x commandname" that takes a long time > is the call to `execute-extended-command--shorter' - like this: > > (execute-extended-command--shorter "find-eev-quick-intro" [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51143 Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 51143@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eduardo Ochs writes: > Let me summarize. The part of "M-x commandname" that takes a long time > is the call to `execute-extended-command--shorter' - like this: > > (execute-extended-command--shorter "find-eev-quick-intro" "find-eev-qui") But it's run like this: (while-no-input (execute-extended-command--shorter "find-eev-quick-intro" "find-eev-qui")) So typing any key should abort it. I'm not saying we shouldn't make the function shorter, but what's the use case where this matters to the user? You mention it affecting `M-x TAB', but as far as I can see, that function is never called when doing that? I tried M-x debug-on-entry RET execute-extended-command--shorter RET M-x TAB and it wasn't called. Do you have a complete recipe, starting from "emacs -Q", that demonstrates the problem? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 12 09:39:54 2021 Received: (at 51143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2021 13:39:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39641 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1maI0X-00072v-If for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:39:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44120) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1maI0Q-00071n-2M for 51143@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:39:46 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maI0K-0007xx-7l; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:39:40 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2226 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maI0J-0002qL-Rl; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:39:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:39:32 +0300 Message-Id: <83ee8qqs4r.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Eduardo Ochs , Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: (message from Eduardo Ochs on Mon, 11 Oct 2021 23:44:57 -0300) Subject: Re: bug#51143: 29.0.50; Long delay after M-x commandname References: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51143 Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 51143@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Eduardo Ochs > Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 23:44:57 -0300 > > I noticed that when I was invoking commands with M-x commandname and > using tab for completing parts of the name then sometimes there would > be a long delay - sometimes as long as 10 seconds, but my laptop is > quite old - between the RET and the execution of the command. This > delay was big on emacs28 and practically imperceptible on emacs27, and > it seemed that it was getting worse in more recent versions of > emacs28/29. > > I discussed this on help-gnu-emacs before submitting a bug report. The > main links are these ones: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2021-10/msg00232.html Edrx > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2021-10/msg00259.html MH > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2021-10/msg00261.html Edrx 2 > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2021-10/msg00265.html MH 2 > > Let me summarize. The part of "M-x commandname" that takes a long time > is the call to `execute-extended-command--shorter' - like this: > > (execute-extended-command--shorter "find-eev-quick-intro" "find-eev-qui") > > Michael Heerdegen was able to reproduce the problem and profile it. > See this message: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2021-10/msg00265.html MH 2 Stefan, any advice? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 12 11:56:27 2021 Received: (at 51143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2021 15:56:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49944 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1maK8g-0002O7-LS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:56:26 -0400 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:21575) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1maK8R-0002Mg-I5 for 51143@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:56:24 -0400 Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 00D108054C; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:56:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6EAA3802B7; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:56:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1634054164; bh=ZO6YCgXomzfUXRaBqgLikSd13KJo6iE3f3rroqeKI9Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=VmfVk6OdJZXMngAotxTCeUh0hsbZHXxjvwnkb3LuJ+ZUo8K1m2JKN69KjERAbXIuY OKozN/Nk+wv/VnNKZu/9B4+COF1Vyj7TFcLsyqZF3MvV2BAYr1wKxkx/hSVkK+4PTM s1I6syQdNJy4M3khUNCSGn4cVwoXZEALiODl8kmRwksoSwlPI6w4SQdtoKRuXSYlX3 IoDM9oULjI1pCc227SHCX+EHQqLzN++Zj+wftT7H3l2jOvtwPsbtgkbepfuJrM9vPS bXeujBQxNrm4+BxMxFtNf1KSibqAgUKC6RTYtkxgPEQzJnDRZDf4yvS8nvt784YL4u BsNkLjoK4/WLg== Received: from alfajor (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F0DD12023C; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:56:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#51143: 29.0.50; Long delay after M-x commandname Message-ID: References: <83ee8qqs4r.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:55:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83ee8qqs4r.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:39:32 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL 0.155 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51143 Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 51143@debbugs.gnu.org, Eduardo Ochs X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2021-10/msg00265.html MH 2 > Stefan, any advice? I already gave some advice in that gnu.emacs.help thread, I don't think I have much more to add. Michael's ideas for optimizations are definitely worth exploring (my intuition suggests the current approach (shorter-to-longer) is better than the other way around, but I never bothered to confirm it). Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 12 15:05:52 2021 Received: (at 51143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2021 19:05:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53675 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1maN5z-0006Pw-Re for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:05:52 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:42880) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1maN5y-0006Ph-7m for 51143@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:05:50 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id l6so176485plh.9 for <51143@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:05:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JRfI+e5KFhVAa+RUWiqwyC6tcqA5oRF6shAo22fJWKc=; b=D2+CYwyOwtiEqRRcZ4jq+M0JKVxdhAo1Vdjn3iM8Red9vAxX105wEsDz1eCY5Yrg/N I9mY2MGdVWT74VW0uYR2XMTt8XSM+IXjG17q1PcmrXNRDuN9ypKzyJCG4W4nQdgX4wVx ypsOgZjIgGTsTkDIr/nxwJd7fHjTrx8t9pGXPi3rrRRnFvEuGYcTLgReGRlKIWlJ030v TCgY3YXoFcxzLsGIonZs1ZDpKWrZ9rvHII6csAxfB7v+iwNN13wf51x4XuQgrLzCna9M dGOkosRMiug6cip11+lSyxzmpFyIm8/BvRuPXlVwtwW3XAMzVznSdvRNqZkKn8kHEz7F m1FA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JRfI+e5KFhVAa+RUWiqwyC6tcqA5oRF6shAo22fJWKc=; b=6kvi4JXFd0wl7J63CphXiFcKdItZjpR8d/7Z/lgifn1ijftojSkhN0ZHGURUQ0eMpS KX1Alzor+BkpIEQoQBa4kILYYH1Np9c1EEKLc8XezOs0hnvb66Jk9UGYrsCvF9CDKwyB GCZgEbstRsuJNLcm/btY0Phcrasu8wocTyp/B+0g1OVyi3J1798Irfe5wgvRKaPQYbYR OdsMueZornqUJao5F41MlY1NMUNT0OgiT3Px57/DfCF0MEdlQ2+f+LWW/w5itClYyKiZ CEj/H5wfQl52Bsa2cf9vIb5NcmhUYAnwJSXWzbAAcqLQ8sei5Kqje1H/XKc2Qyi6I3k4 YjTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Eu6/GOCwDfrHO7Qi23GX0165tOC2CbeVrqz3EdIRoeV5V4i9y 3VzdqwOszFg8815AvvVfIC+8l/jajMi2gtTlrjY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNT5GUYhgATALn8Q5OxUpgYfmhnrZ6tSYOeELC9Zk2ZL9MFntdaFFnpO1fgbXz0FU+8oq7HRns6AHStX83gMs= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:5502:: with SMTP id b2mr8171554pji.154.1634065544244; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:05:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87ee8qcsfr.fsf@gnus.org> In-Reply-To: <87ee8qcsfr.fsf@gnus.org> From: Eduardo Ochs Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:05:32 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#51143: 29.0.50; Long delay after M-x commandname To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51143 Cc: Michael Heerdegen , 51143@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 at 09:56, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > > But it's run like this: > > (while-no-input (execute-extended-command--shorter "find-eev-quick-intro" "find-eev-qui")) > > So typing any key should abort it. > > I'm not saying we shouldn't make the function shorter, but what's the > use case where this matters to the user? You mention it affecting > `M-x TAB', but as far as I can see, that function is never called when > doing that? > > I tried > > M-x debug-on-entry RET execute-extended-command--shorter RET > M-x TAB > > and it wasn't called. Do you have a complete recipe, starting from > "emacs -Q", that demonstrates the problem? Hi Lars, I commit many mistakes when I type, so I prefer recipes that can be executed by just typing `C-x C-e' at the right places. The delay is much longer on emacses with more packages loaded and more functions defined. If I try to run `M-x find-eev-quick-intro' by typing M-x f i n d - e e v - q TAB RET in an Emacs28 without -Q then the code in `execute-extended-command' takes 10 seconds to display the message You can run the command `find-eev-quick-intro' with `M-x -q-i' and _ONLY THEN_ it shows the temporary buffer that find-eev-quick-intro produces. You're right about this being interruptible by typing a key - I didn't know that trick - but I'm used to only choose what to type in those buffers after seeing their contents, so I'll have retrain myself to type, say, , on such delays, and for me it's easier to just execute (setq extended-command-suggest-shorter nil) when I start to get bothered by such delays than to retrain myself, so here's one user - me - and one use case - the one above - in which this matters... =S There is a recipe here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2021-10/msg00261.html its main line (plus something that I will explain soon) is: (execute-extended-command--shorter "find-eev-quick-intro" "find-eev-qui") (execute-extended-command--shorter "find-eev-quick-intro" "123456789012") `execute-extended-command--shorter' only cares about the length of its second argument, so using "find-eev-qui" in the second argument is equivalent to using "123456789012". The discussion about that bug is happening part here and part in help-gnu-emacs. See: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2021-10/msg00280.html Cheers, E. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 12 15:19:25 2021 Received: (at 51143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2021 19:19:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53764 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1maNJ7-0006pp-C5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:19:25 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41844) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1maNJ1-0006pR-BU for 51143@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:19:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xEOylAyVliGL0X4t+jdoUZOmvDLTjfJ9m6z4cxox/7w=; b=ixtJb3wlSSaKTriEWtbWphI9sj fAHGT+W7l54iRraoUZsmccw+tK+tp3O+VAx17WNunvkv5s4C9fB2PSoWJ7pTyRDohRDF2CrYymH79 JXWe3Wf6guQaJtPzVIJvqy8+Bg4itzNmx+4CzGYxHHvNLKuiIzZ78+wKjBy8ACPxuzmE=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1maNIs-0000EY-GR; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 21:19:12 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eduardo Ochs Subject: Re: bug#51143: 29.0.50; Long delay after M-x commandname References: <87ee8qcsfr.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Espen Reinertsen's _Forgaflingspop_: "Grov =?utf-8?Q?h?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=B8st=22?= Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 21:19:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Eduardo Ochs's message of "Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:05:32 -0300") Message-ID: <87r1cq9hlf.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eduardo Ochs writes: > If I try to run `M-x find-eev-quick-intro' by typing > > M-x f i n d - e e v - q TAB RET > > in an Emacs28 without -Q then the code in `execute-extended-command' > takes 10 seconds to display the me [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51143 Cc: Michael Heerdegen , 51143@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eduardo Ochs writes: > If I try to run `M-x find-eev-quick-intro' by typing > > M-x f i n d - e e v - q TAB RET > > in an Emacs28 without -Q then the code in `execute-extended-command' > takes 10 seconds to display the message > > You can run the command `find-eev-quick-intro' with `M-x -q-i' So TAB doesn't take ten seconds? > and _ONLY THEN_ it shows the temporary buffer that > find-eev-quick-intro produces. That's really weird, because `execute-extended-command--shorter' is run from a timer after the command has finished executed -- so it shouldn't get in the way of executing the command, no matter how long it takes. Try to M-x debug-on-entry RET execute-extended-command--shorter RET M-x find-eev-quick-intro RET and post the resulting backtrace. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 27 23:37:47 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Oct 2021 03:37:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51020 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mfwEc-0001Ya-Qc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 23:37:46 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f170.google.com ([209.85.215.170]:34794) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mfwEZ-0001Y7-OA for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 23:37:45 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f170.google.com with SMTP id h193so5090411pgc.1 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 20:37:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PgFrylgqU4mrJiEyf6exrlJC47LZkrTfPXS4wdB++4c=; b=ERHOjCbAsTBm6arC3wScY8TnhNWWyOsqOC1jjiVQbUYM8xZXvmlh8kl2c+T9B13BCs jzq6aE50FnkI5cX11owSU/V8fHgXgEyS4n+smtHRkeMR5dAzSfGLfSVEubfvMxj0hjzx 3FLd7YsAo5ir9Dl6fO2juCmO3Gy13WzR4RI7EUlrXY08niQDs9s7QGh4RwqBwUhKkp5Q aaGvLnVOg8SZBsmLbqKoxPtiNNsNh3pm+Key6fhpcnAqMluHMlHsJrhrXRbkApjxPsKT ZcJu0ettol2soCZ7tPckc3ZpAbU8AgJ4yza2kUuqe7Jni010YXqPrhFPFcwVbhcu3P9P 2/2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5304jC8G4SDxaIhxKEcpvkMHjOdju0crWciOJ5WgZsol4FIB4bN7 s87+tto/7V8mYInARJuzC1dvtGgGjrYuJD74+C4r6xcn X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtAZw/A3rKUUpUeAVsebhLFQIJb9yVhznnNDUYaD0HbvDBMt7DX4SBdxc7msh6bxAHtKWzUmHpAN/E5FdkiBE= X-Received: by 2002:a63:370c:: with SMTP id e12mr1325614pga.359.1635392257943; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 20:37:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 20:37:37 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 20:37:37 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: control message for bug #51143 To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) tags 51143 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 29 14:26:08 2021 Received: (at 51143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2021 19:26:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39440 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mrmHw-0000xm-88 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:26:08 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33630) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mrmHu-0000wY-Cj for 51143@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:26:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zngqMKVfcmTF4vKFaNlR5G8UzXp8kv0YyHaOS6Uv3Q4=; b=CekBx/kDUJ6wsqrmNfYrK39o+8 4KoUpKbS3D4vi9MORZoOS0/qo1IKzRei3oM/p8hHEjv3s7IvS0ILtZ7yQqe1K/a9enh1uZjyKisOT dEuO29Egw3FN3xTPVcQ24KhMYZ6mQrWWK/CUP4o1tc9CjeHZnEveyQUFFt1QM0w2QEL4=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mrmHl-0007lW-Kv; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:26:00 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eduardo Ochs Subject: Re: bug#51143: 29.0.50; Long delay after M-x commandname References: <87ee8qcsfr.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1cq9hlf.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Leslie Winer's _When I Hit You, You'll Feel It_: "This Blank Action" Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:25:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87r1cq9hlf.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 12 Oct 2021 21:19:08 +0200") Message-ID: <878rx6sr0c.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Try to > > M-x debug-on-entry RET execute-extended-command--shorter RET > M-x find-eev-quick-intro RET > > and post the resulting backtrace. More information was requested, but no response was given within a month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51143 Cc: Michael Heerdegen , 51143@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Try to > > M-x debug-on-entry RET execute-extended-command--shorter RET > M-x find-eev-quick-intro RET > > and post the resulting backtrace. More information was requested, but no response was given within a month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 29 14:26:13 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2021 19:26:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39443 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mrmI1-0000y2-Ew for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:26:13 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33660) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mrmHz-0000xc-Fz for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:26:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rrqNGCq7B1H8M3ltfTdgSHQEFDlLMvZOCLT/HpnIpFw=; b=RKw0ox2HieajeCysZCrbADYJlX +wIEQvMraoubFUBykusvgxL+wLCN3+CzGzu2MqVpjO4e5BP/1tUZLaZiStbmgBHIv66XXms7wUWXI 0vcfNwHCWOwISYgYGYpoOT3NTP3ahqheaHw78GwkSYSb2QIfkO9z2tGnUfjBMNGnI980=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mrmHr-0007lk-N5 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:26:06 +0100 Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:26:03 +0100 Message-Id: <877dcqsr04.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #51143 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 51143 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 51143 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 29 15:11:46 2021 Received: (at 51143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2021 20:11:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39545 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mrn06-0006bO-Gh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:11:46 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:53187) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mrn05-0006bB-73 for 51143@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:11:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1638216698; bh=3jKF5PaTWMdMtsYGUrepiymEKDr8b5xlgY8gEdbfsEs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=M6d11I6RG+JBLebyRl5x1zG74YWU/mzMeRaxSqmJrkdBsp52Jp/NF71hvXqzybJbn Yf0/HQWmhru33FnFaSIQrAmek2/EDDIPGzpdYV6cxMswOAOzfPYae/DV932YC6X9UA xhFM/ukry22tgkRGxYpTRn/f8pc3sxYZLiEERxp4= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from drachen.dragon ([92.208.225.87]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb006 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MFrxr-1moiqj040l-00HE7S; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 21:11:38 +0100 From: Michael Heerdegen To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#51143: 29.0.50; Long delay after M-x commandname References: <87ee8qcsfr.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1cq9hlf.fsf@gnus.org> <878rx6sr0c.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 21:11:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <878rx6sr0c.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:25:55 +0100") Message-ID: <87bl22g1s8.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:C1KLOC/p+GMSGGz+jDbdDH/qWmp46tfFviNAEACPz63C7WDOa97 hzXAe0ZhCt2TycnfojZimBbmvXnO8+CcV5xswLhHndAu4mXcCE/6UcsCbAUdwIMdI51ROYm Ikm6mRXb6UhQltn8R7XNuoesYNsBX1gSA74Sh7auam8YQiGWqbzngDCf7TY5RoepHSq3CX3 Gyjw2xmySkF0eY6tjeRUA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:xOwjY6HedFM=:tb4MZRIekLO71WymCp8vus 7GJwj4s6h2J5Wrqpui2RhGgk+jInSFrI2XdjOTNY4L2+vZb0mlUMBZbMsMKtvflAW8abzo7+E 1soJ56XEdmKU0j01vkZhwR/m3VNPv8f2wMZYCdO4el/LwHCvQCk9gyZ1UfakLf0JmivlxvCMG +0CodmWS7TBX42h6nbNGMJFxw9zaYjyV9BoXT6CuRZ5R8xFpF758CLOvrCm+MeAORh/Wjyy+v 7oByC8yfPY1zXQ4g5j/AiVBbiXwrKNjlOslWnYc2D3OTR8KLOFhKBHbWWDlRtQqtR9gnrx1vV px2ABJ9+Y+3kLPhvhdy98a6DaKZFyoR/iOWWOO4RNig896iRe+3Mhq4ayuemNoLuua3fJEr0o av9itMUHCcNOol0ddLc9H5YyNWZkag1hTv5jUShvEmVskevYF/qQ6M2fV3nNJVmGfEsQ9IdqF bnVdPQ+Fp6PUdGmBh7oYITduqZK+0L8uiT94YsBoNH3s+wcOFUCwitWeeOoXMxHSYYzyBekdE eC5atX4ptFc30F2g3L35nKKd582pfp8wSnegBv987SS4uUbaYN+eDSf7z0OW8GaDtSq0pQ4/W dO0VREjPXD1wykn0Yw5rVREikC7raKpQnBG5y4A1mlPaHRn83OqDNwfAAFUyXfGrIEhXUF/sP 4fsBcE7EE6ipSIglqTfuwYBfIQ78RYLwOuFCmjMPY61xJEObCcbUsHfIUIzxmrlWrWzuKFsZF GNkR5RT9bfQmf4g7ItKH6QI7wMM5nfk3GqT1e6ipJ4iUHpOWy7F08IstRucnsPoK6yjlEtBOj iRDwAq2zFc22JtoyVzpcjZoWO3yEFqHckTcKVP5+DmwhnLWtqDAIoLAK+261BDkIFioUpf+cY WUIApiqHPXJuXIKxJxtJUZTGj994xSDTBp3re8FAqhjpvOELlr0g5GD6ZBHBiTBNPyJX5PHRF TbaA/KqN34PkUxE8Xk3vHO8uUbPCsdOvIjDBlSOO1mORbF9KHmc1taQCmbo72am6SYLyMYwcn 1O97POlWPcRUC0K7f5VB9vKslupTAZRVDMoCPFRCfuKOdrQrRzcmIt7Zm/j9fVl9gWSNhYQ6C rbjC7Wwrg1ma2w= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51143 Cc: 51143@debbugs.gnu.org, Eduardo Ochs X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > More information was requested, but no response was given within a > month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, > please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. I could reproduce the issue and I had some ideas how to improve the situation, please reopen. Michael. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 29 15:13:31 2021 Received: (at 51143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2021 20:13:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39558 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mrn1n-0006eh-Nw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:13:31 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34230) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mrn1m-0006eK-C8 for 51143@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:13:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=iY0lByvS3GTopmyC9BqPmy+g/ZI4Xf81IonEY8DpqDE=; b=INUuJ6MHRdTNfaD/B2nYeI+Zxu pF45HMEHEqRh7QucDjIEpkGMsJ4arRUpnpyNPPMpJIpLJO57mNn+g9KmV0Uw6msrs+bDWnlSt5wYx fVsYUaPFKChHtDfiHpY+T4k6FBecjtDA+Jr5ayYpx9oIO/NdliCcnCDoI6B6Mezg93oE=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mrn1e-000848-0L; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 21:13:24 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Michael Heerdegen Subject: Re: bug#51143: 29.0.50; Long delay after M-x commandname References: <87ee8qcsfr.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1cq9hlf.fsf@gnus.org> <878rx6sr0c.fsf@gnus.org> <87bl22g1s8.fsf@web.de> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAFVBMVEUJCAkqKiofHx8e HiBISEdAPz7///+cw1o9AAAAAWJLR0QGYWa4fQAAAAd0SU1FB+ULHRQND2HA9rIAAAGQSURBVDjL 5VNBchwhDBRSHjDA+g5DHiBoPyAb+wOpyv/fkgbW5XXKe3BVbpma2Rm6JTUttCL/z3U8Isr6xSM6 PabGF+TDj0/AzMf8n1mEtA/rXbnH+FvqtW65N7Mae6zTOp6j3zmsV3S2yhqxGN/x+Ep05H7Cq0v4 +U4sCfAmAbm84dfpLTZC1tKLtfC0t/OddTClucwNXE29uSE+PZV6AlRezNIPBys8abE20BQjdfGV Qrb0FN0KnVUchmxG0EoIlHDC2kTTITXBLy7P5cxgLGSYFjkPRwS+sb7NqNkwhXRHFrtk2z5sNqk3 ldFHzJGE79A5OOOkzuCIxAPhxdgzM8GpSBJSGVH6xavksRtssFFo99Qs4VV6hsP3QRnHIBzdprJr R18ixgDKaFGPg5/BkdZhoTKncW8YOTvT3TN0ZdxGs2gePrhGVL0bh2KagxMZ9VRanC7txsHmOwA3 67LfmQfi41fC/ifMIF/xaaqdMZW/Js50RnpYiN8RzKVPn2XbjZC7zZVJoPmHYuvLppGMP6M+Mp5c oDFnAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIxLTExLTI5VDIwOjEzOjE1KzAwOjAw9TOoYgAAACV0 RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMS0xMS0yOVQyMDoxMzoxNSswMDowMIRuEN4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Alasdair Roberts og =?utf-8?Q?V=C3=B6lvur's?= _The Old Fabled River_: "The Tender Hour" Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 21:13:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87bl22g1s8.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2021 21:11:35 +0100") Message-ID: <87fsrera8u.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Michael Heerdegen writes: > I could reproduce the issue and I had some ideas how to improve the > situation, please reopen. OK; reopened. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51143 Cc: 51143@debbugs.gnu.org, Eduardo Ochs X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Michael Heerdegen writes: > I could reproduce the issue and I had some ideas how to improve the > situation, please reopen. OK; reopened. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:21:49 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: Did not alter fixed versions and reopened. Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:14:02 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # Did not alter fixed versions and reopened. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 29 15:13:31 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2021 20:13:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39556 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mrn1n-0006ea-HM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:13:31 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34218) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mrn1a-0006dx-Qe for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:13:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nOTNgqF/P//D/0rSduz4UFyMPeVou+wBvYsLgGhDAow=; b=ZLhkeSGm9771cXdzgT5bv4em1M E49fXX3cM81vMQq/kJnkQ/oddvj1wAsyyXzbw3KMM04GdzrAnQsaXCPsPhymugJwCTG2Crh4vGJFF 1DqO4dBc6lvxvrRCGfMHO6N0txI/2U9enHn6HAW7RHz1RcEkyUI3f3V1VrLVYwrPUKcs=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mrn1S-000841-TH for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 21:13:13 +0100 Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 21:13:10 +0100 Message-Id: <87k0gqra95.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #51143 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 51143 - moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 51143 - moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 12 07:50:24 2022 Received: (at 51143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2022 11:50:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44423 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oXhxH-0003o2-Qu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 07:50:24 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51858) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oXhxG-0003nb-7l for 51143@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 07:50:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ArdfJEBel/E1lMI5+4RGVB0rjCbwOuiNC/eHGHEAzaU=; b=pXo4zTHBbQYA0+nRncGOtaiLxS aKH3Z6rU9L+9V4s75rz3aBKgEX99iOWz7PkED+882ffGA6lqAbKbRUo9rCz8iqNZ1g7rTdhem4EuW hDZr2tfaZTVMVuAquRhB7FRd186FoMHSbcT4pFUjpn0NCGUNi9XtXEZcy0fdY7/95IvI=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oXhx8-0005nd-4K; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 13:50:16 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Michael Heerdegen Subject: Re: bug#51143: 29.0.50; Long delay after M-x commandname In-Reply-To: <87bl22g1s8.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2021 21:11:35 +0100") References: <87ee8qcsfr.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1cq9hlf.fsf@gnus.org> <878rx6sr0c.fsf@gnus.org> <87bl22g1s8.fsf@web.de> X-Now-Playing: Moor Mother's _Jazz Codes_: "Woody Shaw (feat Melanie Charles)" Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 13:50:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87pmg07qx6.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Michael Heerdegen writes: >> More information was requested, but no response was given within a >> month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, >> please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug re [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51143 Cc: 51143@debbugs.gnu.org, Eduardo Ochs X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Michael Heerdegen writes: >> More information was requested, but no response was given within a >> month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, >> please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. > > I could reproduce the issue and I had some ideas how to improve the > situation, please reopen. This was almost a year ago -- do you have a recipe to reproduce the problem? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 12 07:50:28 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2022 11:50:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44426 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oXhxM-0003oO-4J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 07:50:28 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51872) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oXhxK-0003nq-Lu for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 07:50:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=PgFrylgqU4mrJiEyf6exrlJC47LZkrTfPXS4wdB++4c=; b=Bz4VRzwOx+5lXPcnyokbTfkTO7 BGUmAvZtq/elrn7gs4vz6g3DGx03M8tYPjodhzYNf4c0F5IH32H8lgkeP3AMY4KdwsT8+qRHhIHae yguqUVPnlbh2dPRm5rPqfMJMDjdEBIu2dqCd7uNxEQ9GMdxTN7IVRXTW7NV/EDWnCzVc=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oXhxD-0005nm-0K for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 13:50:21 +0200 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 13:50:18 +0200 Message-Id: <87o7vk7qx1.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #51143 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 51143 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 51143 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 15 05:49:49 2022 Received: (at 51143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2022 09:49:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57173 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oYlVF-0007sr-BY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 05:49:49 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:43569) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oYlVA-0007sY-0F for 51143@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 05:49:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1663235375; bh=h4YVRFHHNJZMt9t3B/9ulbh7FJmeXY2gD8OCm9EKkrA=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=hHbMKbXvqCmtPk/6K2UXMCLsnbb1+lVR20oLPgjInUFz1/q+r5kmdD0DdnV1yvCTN Pk53+VDzayZXKQyIgZsiMzy1KZpedd/dN1FbMzR18r+Q68zg+Nb/3wcKoFw5+wXP8X 45eF7SM/dvpWRC85oTXoW3mW6ozQBJe/UzU1hleEnkBIIokK02bp4J0HKBYM+3/E/D 72vBYQ59lf5wqtPOPAIcl671i/gkiyleoDqEywzhZkZ7Te20mzRKND3p5vClxmoeZ/ CU2ETsYX+Nn7zAHczTYYj1H1oKPqDbbEb6wcyD/oub645kWlRe64fxIMU1rzNlJ9pD uOiBmywmHptWQ== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Received: from drachen.dragon ([92.208.190.67]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb105 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M59jC-1oZrQZ1ESC-001Y0u; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 11:49:35 +0200 From: Michael Heerdegen To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#51143: 29.0.50; Long delay after M-x commandname In-Reply-To: <87pmg07qx6.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 12 Sep 2022 13:50:13 +0200") References: <87ee8qcsfr.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1cq9hlf.fsf@gnus.org> <878rx6sr0c.fsf@gnus.org> <87bl22g1s8.fsf@web.de> <87pmg07qx6.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 11:49:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87y1uldl1t.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:JEOeOuuYRbicLcuHUqsjN7lQThbmvOMBWagvKNSeYr3DMdWJoa8 LEvJ8xEjnWqB+lFfJMRAD84vPMBAmHrqiYaw+ftF2TdOcgJWFRMFzKwu4Jp5CLUtV8GRG7A 4IinqgzfJwuGw8hprd3RQDffksb9ypHLn8id4CB67se6UGcNHXZYrSg7Sa8PcUlN0YYnAg2 vOQsikWFDZIwiIRkJg+mA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:syGBg8sU2Hk=:iSVoxl7hzjPMfIaUAabZlC bnP5MI9kdDGAwiVf/x4HQQLoPBGkrsiqXHon0g4qIh6skBI7alVl0aelNilRDKx5zOElDcvmh hwTHC0g+eiC8cyHnv9i7UtQRoQZoxUWdlwldRuj727hoUzGW5r6EZa2xUrz9YJ71u0LxdPY33 laiSR/++0J2HCttjVrOJ6RPxaqF1xSHPeiIurCE2MqND7xWABDySX9Htcos/ImjReroIsnOJ3 gZLI+HL9hu+yb3gvY4KsCdZIqTWpzF5tCAjv45962oN4WukReS6sgrB1f9D6M9MmChkOTNGAS +BbTDnGyv+shs+AtESg5UDUGWR76coo+OPsA071YkmSOptp6fE26XooMBnfwoWdXDXry3q3c1 4stcs2XIXxAbyt4GMSd1QkbqeKJPhCEmVagmPfK1+xY9s32baIbmkdFRfWqp0n8CdnDqK/lUs 6cmKt/wyaZqeCkBM4b0h9jv/7VQ4w/6CLwD6w7PyvDZppIYwwiu2lvGAtHFJPBRdIzy2nYOCx Z8v9n0sYyJsWoOZlJFgn9GD6BEn7Q29tyalkqc6iB7kBTCRP9Zm7xzSmZdxrAG5NIEjUgCEEd 6Vq/mPj3Iwh4kWxG/u+H4IgmwV1VmhdbtNaRTMAczIi3FzLtdIhcJteeMPweVylvrGa9Timkp 9cfdmo91VuKkSfQr9bGcjmoJYD4Gzqdev0m8rtYhbc1si40lfWl1NHxRPKvWmgo6ikF0SS09V KwcvLe6gnsrNxRGdtzyjoWyWu+VjPfP1l/NNb52vN7B8DMDX66C9Mqu9xf8FSO3StDis3UcOH h91JCx+e6LFrgpBgigXMp22yx3Yudgp8kmLNB9RK0RTA/B3zW6Vv4V16G5U3xRO6cc8G6rp1N +gP0f72q8wlPd2HWmoSvvihSozVZ2GgKA6oKJMrph+1Tgn69WLC5qiOy03JeZ55f57URqC72k DaKL0UNf3RefyAlVK0S9oHtOc2jtgnOyBVlDg9Hlc9rV5Gz/WxLzErVb9aS+cq/3j+ceEz0rh 8pcCU1Dxp7jZ2UkmOYeahSjgWzirt/OsEI+6/1mU2HrVK3mw3o2S14FN/beSOB/pQf8p98kz8 8y5JsRruCAOZf+8GrknA4oToOlBgQxk9EYx6EA4bSMTHwKIDos4YZqILvUlUBvrYPGU846cpQ FN8CsZJlB+l6EoQdyZ6Hcdcp1M X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51143 Cc: 51143@debbugs.gnu.org, Eduardo Ochs X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > I could reproduce the issue and I had some ideas how to improve the > > situation, please reopen. > > This was almost a year ago -- do you have a recipe to reproduce the > problem? AFAIR the originally posted recipe was complete, you only had to have enough stuff defined so that `execute-extended-command--shorter' gets slow. It had been my goal to improve the speed of that function. I remember what I had discussed with Stefan. The uncontroversial part was to factor out the `commandp' tests out of `completion-try-completion'. I'll have a look. Michael. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 03 18:41:03 2022 Received: (at 51143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2022 22:41:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51865 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ofU7T-00065a-Fl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 18:41:03 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:48273) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ofU7R-00064z-TX for 51143@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 18:41:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1664836855; bh=A/9/vvGs01EdYWUDreqVa6yZ76Ne1vZ8npHwLgRtnaA=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=Xqz40s3YWYLeU+rhX4p9Mj+t03OpJeaUVltI4XX+GrOjiXGz4eQbaoWy88FWbKxsZ 5er6xldP36eSib7YbUWCJg4incwxuaFrg2JkoSwBUEtQ5WaDhOSxuyJMGQIrWRBrNK eRV3OjrcpHSZ/VFvoUI5Ggd17uZdbT1rZRyySKsA/SCjHKphAcwV4DcErjAN9Rnt7/ 3Im3RUg/OfaZPKR6gjlhgv2UYLRzmn52TzKYtPqMTEDW3Ux6pOxbsBULKDi71bspNX SYwn3Gbc5+TiZ+exQjx9EFKK9q5tGWsp/qSBErwBhoGuIT1gkFjvt9tsxWxzEY2JQG QMo1hhsJh1B6w== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.222.172.180]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb006 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MjxiW-1p3nJ91Osy-00kc1U; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 00:40:55 +0200 From: Michael Heerdegen To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#51143: 29.0.50; Long delay after M-x commandname In-Reply-To: <87y1uldl1t.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Thu, 15 Sep 2022 11:49:34 +0200") References: <87ee8qcsfr.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1cq9hlf.fsf@gnus.org> <878rx6sr0c.fsf@gnus.org> <87bl22g1s8.fsf@web.de> <87pmg07qx6.fsf@gnus.org> <87y1uldl1t.fsf@web.de> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 00:40:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87a66czg21.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Z29QiPzPjxyBeqoC8L+b+9UN8qsUXaNkUvN4lmfOskSru4l9VJE aknXz3iFMGKGAgkLGW92pzW+8VP3Xj13eNHOGnnjVkmwVDQPNpdE1f8a1kWcy9mo/eDJ7Xz qu+AaYsxXZT3Fgp0oQNz4dY/qTySC0AjvFCNgnbGlY5TPmNtfWcz0GkaN0ngrdzKjxk1UgY tBJdQwQB9jG8xv7MF5ecA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:BwgjqnmPDBU=:g+8DY8bm79QjLrl3WoiIzh +Az3eKtC5Q0PBFmiDn8D3PjCvyTtuGMEDjUfPX4VwXz+nksL+Thug9ew40Q4zq34PzsjDSvvE +st0Ora3QfDG1IGgH5dFElTG4om1qkuqnHBHJRaZC9cFgCr1VBaKb5SkogYzd5vSqe0H8fq/0 twQNS+EOFtYTUd3l4Bc0E5zGvEzieIjqnJHQgwP5cpiuqRxFJt+LK0DhJCCJVxjvM8zXlzoR/ Co01Qux8J6nli4RCP1DzOjRC++NMukGmTpBS3YTFZQhg0ajp9f0bXfr92x2WGo9KhAZeT/3lX /Np0/9Wn0s30tojZN1LWOIB+WFdskZN1LJ/qzUljYeICsJOaz6+U9IzqPgBVVnHvAD4CcSsMC MmFo8Vsasdiruf3slJLmho5I8tMOTglE+/vRRmNwgXUIPz7127HNGp8qXz2kj1WG03Tv0W6Av P5TqiXtMbQQsC7vBrnzJRX8tGxPqOhmbJLAyqfezF7eu0j3N28D9yLsdXkTxkmWptxZ3VqMtF F89aQH8E/8mP0f3yDdI2VY2QpEdsExbGqT77nYoCkLz63qGIMTJ8xyGXpnoIh9DM+Pi6Ohbqn Szop/Foek06Kw43+nE1fcLLFr6WCv5YYPpoGVveG9Cc0GrbuxceuEQO1GpjmVoCkwDYJy30G9 NHSeroAd4Icqe1e11dMtTWKkE82bshGeNTlimQOq2G81CTwcyfIw7SYAGwI/qlFrRIb60kyoz UQR4ZCM/OAM/8bAs2tjX8wsxZw6fuOl+cl7HV1Co7qt0sWVSCrTfP8P6CMnAQpAkFepM3kDWE 6mQW4lbtspq+/DRsLxrSQCMhJ+D8Scs6AoYqOmQ3ZxFhAvmYgCyi/POsqGNwvD0U7oR6AymOm 2GhvP+/J+Tj/chpwIMHoBZkZHaOzPOTiOZDaNGx4BzFVOX5RaMydZRjn/2fNRz1fWA0Jcb+Dh ZyhU6PFAEeVs2hz6WdkrV6ITGzudflZuzixGmkekg82WzSIAuxgt5RJ/Ju1XTY8CVh6suvIK7 +KDtSq4KV8USg7sMdXmvb10Uou6Oa/oF5exljPaoaVdHo/40v9IKLX/rHvc9MtJxSIwwEzSWq UKAKJXtkHLFtWfs36DXtLdlixL+LcMr2EurmPdxRkCOj2Ps6vIKziwb6qPizg8cXWNFvEKg1j f4eWRwbbHXZ/679RdA1+3uzSTI X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51143 Cc: 51143@debbugs.gnu.org, Eduardo Ochs X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Michael Heerdegen writes: > I remember what I had discussed with Stefan. The uncontroversial part > was to factor out the `commandp' tests out of > `completion-try-completion'. > > I'll have a look. This is what I have: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-diff Content-Disposition: inline; filename=0001-Try-to-speed-up-extended-command-shorthand-computati.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =46rom 6bc974197ff3e191971f933cc7f6fd952cdbba86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Heerdegen Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 12:26:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Try to speed up extended command shorthand computation * lisp/simple.el (execute-extended-command--shorter): Compute a complete list of `commandp' symbols once. This significantly speeds up complicated cases while the slowdown of simple cases is still accetable. =2D-- lisp/simple.el | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/simple.el b/lisp/simple.el index 10a610e0c6..6724f3d6fc 100644 =2D-- a/lisp/simple.el +++ b/lisp/simple.el @@ -2465,9 +2465,13 @@ execute-extended-command--shorter-1 (defun execute-extended-command--shorter (name typed) (let ((candidates '()) + commands (max (length typed)) (len 1) binding) + ;; Precompute a list of commands once to avoid repeated `commandp' te= sting + ;; of symbols in the `completion-try-completion' call inside the loop= below + (mapatoms (lambda (s) (when (commandp s) (push s commands)))) (while (and (not binding) (progn (unless candidates @@ -2480,8 +2484,8 @@ execute-extended-command--shorter (input-pending-p) ;Dummy call to trigger input-processing, bug#2= 3002. (let ((candidate (pop candidates))) (when (equal name - (car-safe (completion-try-completion - candidate obarray 'commandp len))) + (car-safe (completion-try-completion + candidate commands nil len))) (setq binding candidate)))) binding)) =2D- 2.30.2 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain This speeds up computations of extended command shortcuts by a factor of around 4 in the complicated cases, while the slowdown for the easy cases is hardly noticeable. Maybe Eduardo can give that a try? Further improvements are probably not that low-hanging fruits. The calculation is also always interruptible so I don't think more work is worth the trouble. Michael. --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 03 19:33:54 2022 Received: (at 51143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2022 23:33:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51891 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ofUwb-0007Mq-UJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 19:33:54 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38784) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ofUwa-0007Md-Gt for 51143@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 19:33:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5k7XUQhQrmaVbqDOjHay1GDqsRUEe5Id+2KAAxJ1B/Q=; b=TqVvY+/jFJ6WylweR2vVSKlgmc 9LttQo7sfUdLAS4xPy7xbbixNpgdZy0Ewx1o5YJMpTFgTEAzqY6gVh68HRzeedZBGaZJK8F4nU0i7 t2CJFSieM+D4hmqpzxL5Ec7SiDObt3PmJKaRNzhPLd6Ln/tzaom87TQryYMiTwn4+wSw=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=downe) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ofUwS-0005it-8B; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 01:33:46 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Michael Heerdegen Subject: Re: bug#51143: 29.0.50; Long delay after M-x commandname In-Reply-To: <87a66czg21.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Tue, 04 Oct 2022 00:40:54 +0200") References: <87ee8qcsfr.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1cq9hlf.fsf@gnus.org> <878rx6sr0c.fsf@gnus.org> <87bl22g1s8.fsf@web.de> <87pmg07qx6.fsf@gnus.org> <87y1uldl1t.fsf@web.de> <87a66czg21.fsf@web.de> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAElBMVEWwjWtxQT+fUEzR saT49O3///+dfHtVAAAAAWJLR0QF+G/pxwAAAAd0SU1FB+YKAxceMlEzPtoAAAGRSURBVDjLfZIB YsMgCEUVcwDjLqCYAzjJAbra+59pH026dHWjasUX+BFizNzs5Cz+CcIUUB8TYEeyWao/xKPxhjtI 66t1/wrC9YmowNvoiWMki10ICe4AkZA4es82Ugwp2XQCNjjpgA2nlNgPDZ+sPwAZZmtPECydIJg4 wKnBAIGtD0j1AsyIQApP11Ts8VZhTWHlAHUOIwJ30xbQccFQjwtCT2tUMB3DPghhAK4smOIUiC7L Ud3FCKzgZ5w0pw6eEgVwdjhiFvzvpWHfToABkR5cMOBCQ4aw6TtXXjpYZq0dYuUdPNTktIfsD9GT rwEu1nZxUyCtIWoCbjidgdaPO3gK672xtNykA+JXs8wr728g6Vx5+TKNcl3yPW+u1lxdZKoun2B3 krdM91wkW1vNAJxZsuScuWZUhy6Aar4BUN3QSbpXOUCstx4BwAD1AA/Sjg+Qn6C/LsSlg09Vq/Ve tg4YX+LWXI5cI0sspOIKbOKohS7jpqGvPZUxWjpFPwXYf1VXK4mOYH3vx2H/AJnb5zdoRIS3tuUh TAAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMi0xMC0wM1QyMzozMDo0OSswMDowMLr3pY0AAAAldEVY dGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjItMTAtMDNUMjM6MzA6NDkrMDA6MDDLqh0xAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Scritti Politti's _Cupid & Psyche 85_: "Lover To Fall" Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 01:33:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87zgec4h48.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Michael Heerdegen writes: > Subject: [PATCH] Try to speed up extended command shorthand computation Makes sense to me. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51143 Cc: 51143@debbugs.gnu.org, Eduardo Ochs X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Michael Heerdegen writes: > Subject: [PATCH] Try to speed up extended command shorthand computation Makes sense to me. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 09 14:53:21 2022 Received: (at 51143-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2022 18:53:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44912 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ohbQO-0000nO-Sj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 14:53:21 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:49465) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ohbQM-0000n6-MA for 51143-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 14:53:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1665341591; bh=zdo+EfEcf9g4A0Kbn0BDO93h4ruvHZ7KhVMT4SqMId8=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=bNb0h1SATClzW3OH17Gx5JE+3m4xuOJ72EZczG46Iq67cnw9p0+csDBJFDyrwUYJY KLkZFTzOI+YS7JxSlJwJekDsbv1lE9+HFDFQyc02KSvjPoqR9qxz1RoHHqsaJq/DzM P/jYZAbGuhs/J5jg1iFcrVR/WIxq71E6uFCF2NrAMa3Z693jpHsogr45AUR7FBA6qu OI4eWQstQofMDlk3iAMAvi0q/RmPKxMb89V9xg7m2nq6tBRTIPCp19RZIUsNXPALNP o18ewHF8s21QTsB2jpKY/GoojpfVgmGxOvT7n2sRPWHFKEpSPc6tZC/ziMy6E0Wd8a sUeOAB1NsRuQA== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.222.172.180]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb006 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MVacq-1oa0ji2pyW-00RrDW; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 20:53:11 +0200 From: Michael Heerdegen To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#51143: 29.0.50; Long delay after M-x commandname In-Reply-To: <87zgec4h48.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 04 Oct 2022 01:33:43 +0200") References: <87ee8qcsfr.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1cq9hlf.fsf@gnus.org> <878rx6sr0c.fsf@gnus.org> <87bl22g1s8.fsf@web.de> <87pmg07qx6.fsf@gnus.org> <87y1uldl1t.fsf@web.de> <87a66czg21.fsf@web.de> <87zgec4h48.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2022 20:53:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87lepo6d7w.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:rwdTinc417ReNW7oRTpq/upz05UTm/92bTjNwWnv0w+Si7530ce Nst8vtD/SQUW2WXTq00i4sjG6X7H0edpfgtVTDcWByYGjVGo025L+XBZMEKZhx90BKUcj4B FZhQk8LUgGp1nq8I7zSxYwONgGUQm0Dmf3K4lRVaZDXFIR36ipmCtWgCFwN1FzXftelJlTo /fE09SUyobnY2HG7fL8qw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:LLeZkUwLSgY=:Mk6Lig13YmZfLjN1DQ+jto mYl7qu9cs2R+/jovtYVaMetZuCN2LaWGamM2rnSU/XKbK9iE1H8hiVkw6e0ZDuLNMLLq5Z3C9 oPUoRaXbh/QPtiaqqi97UacDC9CT2G7HMThwva/OToXpQkdVkg8MFOeD8bhQRki8tCgCD3lvG t6RyjBzS5dX+FNR6UOAiQBONiZ1bT9e7+Ou8MMgp+1x8jyJQZPucaD5+5QfmhnT2NA4iEIgat xKmNXDbWlbqhpF4qv47YS2EnNHps+R/XriePyw/wM9Rl8mn+1U5+akCz+YNA9ky+Hz6Gdbprq hA6coiYQ+FIBEfAbtWvyBX2hTh/lKKkMxuUAHnyCq2sN0w4C4dyYf4/JM4tH3KPlIRc0AwUqE QgLsxgPVS5frqEN6bxtdtJANIAKzmxTh+4NWQ+lxQFnLHLlUtnwiI5auIP7JPobEB/ytI5K8d crW252AE/w9iodT7ylOzdreQ3GPq//gTI+LDTU9rmKJLESYl/ac7JmGphLQXi5WIOpx7eOzJm ak3wBEm+dsCSSV3JO0cLe4YfVry7xc064T/o1MMCtOSeoScct8AAikLqxiIT08eSO5XuPSlEk hEtgbsIzOvaQ3WuKOnErWn02KajslrGioiKVfHL7lMcljSX9UKTGH0H8Hs6rXmNjE7x1X+JBW XEeDL5RXfuZ+8FSv3M6Ik0bB8HyusqOSEJCzBuhnuWNnFuK76M+QFb7gouSwDzUO4MZ9BxA/u EWjHRA0K58dTbV2ArgJSRCFAp7GEr/ATqkq79bo1F1+ttng5ipnn31dQhyF77G1CimUXXdL/2 vFJRTxxG82N8lWTjfKrT/QJgBJT95wB2u0tdY6xgiYsDQYlQxNL3LcfFjXF6fDFiyA0jgx5Ie yn/1HzoToHpQ4+e6nCZV8pF1dACrVmCusns26mKiIxdOZH+5MWkMvhJU0EkdLRTdtW4gK+QLY A+t+mcKkqWUF4AdFaxKdrGsiwBpf83pr2ok1HuR57s2L04jW3BhmdcR6jhIj4Nh/x5YMjMeyM hqS4stHGv0MZ2M5NDKJJHv+eUI34+bJGC0GSgeaNXSNIH77zH+I95asBuMDtl5e5nVuRk3kLF W0TDF4EfSFMkzMj4NEWGhPJwEiHtqA9soLViFiabvRpSKLRFRMuVW56ajgge7tqnqLuB+x6qK F9s1Mx88WsOiLsABkSGEmO8k06pWZJHCHoqU31z3poJkR0dqR5xll5V3tekxqBV0tYKMMX3Cm 4Bm5QWXyOXjpi41XNt71lMFxEwz1oYzBNR7CGv2pvM+tXvXobHOmbt4MFCU5vOV8BoUb1PDmD tKG5+Wm+KF3DPXrNh1qgIaCAXuhXI3MyNefsenUXdiVA0OGfZTz42ov5gmI1RjyyD1wh7FSHc jFLpLSIpXLLafogVLrAzn8heI47gc0vLitSU0DfrS580zqAc8u3u+VCon/tBArmOXuekMllXV 4VRo9hWjj+BKtUo8DfBkdX7RKx9J8R1WY33Z9QWfkFl9c8TIlpATKbiHcy5rhVyrwd3ysQ1tw H0qdmkeAEu05LXEvZiwX8V9OVhON8oUx4q1Rb5uqgykSz X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51143-done Cc: 51143-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Eduardo Ochs X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > Subject: [PATCH] Try to speed up extended command shorthand computation > > Makes sense to me. Ok, thanks. I installed that patch and close the bug again. Michael. From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:21:49 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 12:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator