GNU bug report logs - #51135
timeout: --foreground causes exit status 124, even if KILL was used

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#51135: closed (timeout: --foreground causes exit status 124,
 even if KILL was used)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 21:05:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:04:21 +0100
with message-id <f1cf9710-55c2-e9c7-df78-6a6959ab01d4 <at> draigBrady.com>
and subject line Re: bug#51135: timeout: --foreground causes exit status 124, even if KILL was used
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #51135,
regarding timeout: --foreground causes exit status 124, even if KILL was used
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
51135: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=51135
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo <at> scientia.net>
To: bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: timeout: --foreground causes exit status 124, even if KILL was used
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 20:01:42 +0200

Hey.


This time I've also checked the 9.0 documentation (hopefully I wasn't
just too blind).


I noticed that whenever --foreround is used, timeout exits with a 124
status (instead of the documented 128+9) regardless of whether the KILL
is sent because of --signal=KILL or --kill-after=n .


Thanks,
Chris.

btw: I'm sill on Debian sid's 8.32 version of coreutils.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
To: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo <at> scientia.net>,
 51135-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#51135: timeout: --foreground causes exit status 124, even if
 KILL was used
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:04:21 +0100

On 11/10/2021 19:01, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hey.
> 
> 
> This time I've also checked the 9.0 documentation (hopefully I wasn't
> just too blind).
> 
> 
> I noticed that whenever --foreground is used, timeout exits with a 124
> status (instead of the documented 128+9) regardless of whether the KILL
> is sent because of --signal=KILL or --kill-after=n .

Yes --foreground gives timeout(1) more control over the exit status in this case.
I'll add some clarification to the texinfo manual along these lines:


-In case of the @samp{KILL(9)} signal, @command{timeout} returns with
+In the case of the @samp{KILL(9)} signal, @command{timeout} returns with
 exit status 137, regardless of whether that signal is sent to @var{command}
 or to @command{timeout} itself, i.e., these cases cannot be distinguished.
 In the latter case, the @var{command} process may still be alive after
 @command{timeout} has forcefully been terminated.
+However if the @option{--foreground} option is specified then
+@command{timeout} will not send any signals to its own process,
+and so it will exit with one of the other exit status values detailed above.

thanks,
Pádraig

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.