GNU bug report logs -
#51037
[PATCH] Make `print-level` & `print-length` customizable in ERT batch tests
Previous Next
Reported by: Michael <sp1ff <at> runbox.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:51:02 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Fixed in version 29.1
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On 20/11/2021 08:49 -0800, Michael wrote:
>> On 19/11/2021 07:24 -0800, Michael wrote:
>>
>>> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> Filipp Gunbin <fgunbin <at> fastmail.fm> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> The docstring for backtrace-line-length says: "If set to nil
>>>>> or
>>>>> zero,
>>>>> backtrace mode will not abbreviate the forms it prints." So
>>>>> the
>>>>> above
>>>>> sentence, which I removed, was indeed not true? (a quick
>>>>> look over
>>>>> its usages confirmed that to me, but I'd like someone else to
>>>>> check)
>>>>
>>>> I think the intention is that a nil value of
>>>> backtrace-line-length
>>>> shouldn't limit the lengths -- but I haven't tested it.
>>>> Doesn't it
>>>> work?
>>>
>>> Yes, I'm a bit lost, Filipp... what is your concern? And I
>>> thought I *had* tested that.
>>
>> That the docstring contained a sentence which is not true. A
>> minor
>> issue, of course. I give examples here:
>> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=51037#117
>>
>> (there was also fix of interactive spec of
>> `ert-run-tests-interactively',
>> but that's obvious I think)
>>
> Hey Filipp,
>
> Note that _is_ true, as far as I know, and was intended to be
> true before my patch, and I verified that it became true with my
> patch :) Can you provide a test case that demonstrates it to be
> not true?
Yes, here https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=51037#117, as I
wrote above..
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 225 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.