GNU bug report logs - #50999
29.0.50; Deleting libraries obsolete since Emacs 24

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: luangruo <at> yahoo.com, 50999 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi <at> gnus.org, stefan <at> marxist.se, rms <at> gnu.org
Subject: bug#50999: [External] : bug#50999: 29.0.50; Deleting libraries obsolete since Emacs 24
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:18:36 +0200

> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> CC: "larsi <at> gnus.org" <larsi <at> gnus.org>,
>         "luangruo <at> yahoo.com"
> 	<luangruo <at> yahoo.com>,
>         "50999 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <50999 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>,
>         "stefan <at> marxist.se" <stefan <at> marxist.se>, "rms <at> gnu.org" <rms <at> gnu.org>
> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 18:04:40 +0000
> 
> > > For a long time Emacs even distributed a "contrib"
> > > directory with code provided by others.
> > 
> > According to the VCS logs, we never had such a directory.
> 
> I distinctly remember it, and I recall using some
> of its code.

Show me some distribution that had it, and/or name some files there,
and then I could have a look.  (Assuming this is important.)

> How far back do the VCS logs go?

Back to the very first commits by RMS and friends, in early 1985.

> The point is that there's no obligation to make
> changes (maintenance or other) to code that you've
> declared is "obsolete".

It's easy for you to say that, since you don't have to pick up the
gauntlet of the maintenance.  The downside is non-negligible.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.