From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 02 15:51:40 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2021 19:51:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60630 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWl2p-0000vU-KZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 15:51:39 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:41430) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWl2c-0000vB-Fy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 15:51:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mWl2c-0001DP-7Y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 15:51:26 -0400 Received: from andre.telenet-ops.be ([2a02:1800:120:4::f00:15]:58082) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mWl2Z-0003Vx-Lt for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 15:51:25 -0400 Received: from ptr-bvsjgyjmffd7q9timvx.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:aaf1:9810:a0b8:a55d]) by andre.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id 17rL260030mfAB4017rLCz; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 21:51:20 +0200 Message-ID: <8a0ad7369a557a7b4da2a222ba10b5bb83c6fb01.camel@telenet.be> Subject: "guix home describe" backtraces if "guix home" hasn't been used From: Maxime Devos To: bug-guix@gnu.org Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2021 21:51:13 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-QmV+ZjRNiBhuXVqEWREd" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r21; t=1633204280; bh=apnogiJexthg0uR1h1eAR/fPKIun55wEb3hdgyCdLoU=; h=Subject:From:To:Date; b=joLVKz2Cc+xY5hROW5iCsJdd5+YD8EhEY1yyISGrSc7LH3wGlitnJ5w+CyuGK5T8Z OIj1xGpsE8NBFGpoGEJcxSLynVd1eAfY2PPcziUcodnPcnfi9YjWJ1pwu2nmAMV/5S fiEc4vD9IwgBxjbdYMiXFbeLnYNyh6ucK6G9YZmGlDsvdDdwcXJSDAAWhAXe7IciVR wuoshFZ5GOvuiV32niftFezH2wkExTD6fI4776tNf9ImSUyuv+cFJeP7NpqXnPJM4z rUYgTAKfGTuSyHsOGEfbZl61Tw0bDiaHsCVYqdLHgwmfbEhL2nKNLUd7H1tYQHAjD6 +bceiS0HuPNXA== Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:1800:120:4::f00:15; envelope-from=maximedevos@telenet.be; helo=andre.telenet-ops.be X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, When running "guix home describe" before "guix home import" and before "guix build": $ guix home describe Backtrace: 7 (primitive-load "/home/[...]/.config/guix/current/b…") In guix/ui.scm: 2185:7 6 (run-guix . _) 2148:10 5 (run-guix-command _ . _) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1752:10 4 (wi [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (maximedevos[at]telenet.be) 0.0 T_SPF_TEMPERROR SPF: test of record failed (temperror) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.3 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --=-QmV+ZjRNiBhuXVqEWREd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, When running "guix home describe" before "guix home import" and before "guix build": $ guix home describe Backtrace: 7 (primitive-load "/home/[...]/.config/guix/current/b=E2=80=A6") In guix/ui.scm: 2185:7 6 (run-guix . _) 2148:10 5 (run-guix-command _ . _) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1752:10 4 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) In guix/status.scm: 820:3 3 (_) 800:4 2 (call-with-status-report _ _) In guix/scripts/home.scm: 263:8 1 (_) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception: no home environment generation, nothing to describe~% I don't think a backtrace is needed here. Greetings, Maxime --=-QmV+ZjRNiBhuXVqEWREd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYVi4MRccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7kV6AQC+VOXxbKc8BlkcVHF77BXAdxqk pHZ+Y+yihKM9hxcN/gEA5aXoBQOKYCm9rzRNL8qX4UOaf+Jws9Mv1+UflO3pXgI= =VDuV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-QmV+ZjRNiBhuXVqEWREd-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 02 16:49:02 2021 Received: (at 50978) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2021 20:49:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60709 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWlwM-0002zA-MM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 16:49:02 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:60758 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWlwJ-0002y1-PZ for 50978@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 16:49:00 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1633207731; bh=MO/1dLMbr7EUU4QtVeN80NQ9SyCdG4Q3KRXsjR5vUAY=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=vGaO+HjWpyKemCglbr80SnznlO2zDM4ch2JA6acmAadnrCrPdNADv5uQiulyXZ4Ne lA7YdTq7AWk4EVslOL0CfbPlwxcY8ck7kaPAGfmaDvTWVyQnyW5qJogMy3TuERQmUv 7P6eshr2MCjSdAWVC7xJm1a6+c5GHLH8mguxb7fU= To: Maxime Devos , 50978@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#50978: "guix home describe" backtraces if "guix home" hasn't been used In-Reply-To: <8a0ad7369a557a7b4da2a222ba10b5bb83c6fb01.camel@telenet.be> References: <8a0ad7369a557a7b4da2a222ba10b5bb83c6fb01.camel@telenet.be> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2021 22:48:50 +0200 Message-ID: <8735pjnoel.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sat, Oct 02 2021, Maxime Devos wrote: > Hi, > > When running "guix home describe" before "guix home import" > and before "guix build": > > $ guix home describe > Backtrace: > 7 (primitive-load "/home/[...]/.config/guix/current/b…") > In [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.0 PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP RDNS_DYNAMIC with FP steps X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50978 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sat, Oct 02 2021, Maxime Devos wrote: > Hi, > > When running "guix home describe" before "guix home import" > and before "guix build": > > $ guix home describe > Backtrace: > 7 (primitive-load "/home/[...]/.config/guix/current/b…") > In [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.0 PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP RDNS_DYNAMIC with FP steps --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 02 2021, Maxime Devos wrote: > Hi, > > When running "guix home describe" before "guix home import" > and before "guix build": > > $ guix home describe > Backtrace: > 7 (primitive-load "/home/[...]/.config/guix/current/b=E2=80=A6= ") > In guix/ui.scm: > 2185:7 6 (run-guix . _) > 2148:10 5 (run-guix-command _ . _) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 1752:10 4 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) > In guix/status.scm: > 820:3 3 (_) > 800:4 2 (call-with-status-report _ _) > In guix/scripts/home.scm: > 263:8 1 (_) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) > > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception: > no home environment generation, nothing to describe~% > > I don't think a backtrace is needed here. This seems to be the case for =E2=80=98guix system describe=E2=80=99 too =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix system describe Backtrace: 7 (primitive-load "/home/yoctocell/.config/guix/current/bin/guix= ") In guix/ui.scm: 2185:7 6 (run-guix . _) 2148:10 5 (run-guix-command _ . _) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1752:10 4 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _) In guix/status.scm: 820:3 3 (_) 800:4 2 (call-with-status-report _ _) In guix/scripts/system.scm: 1310:8 1 (_) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception: no system generation, nothing to describe~% =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmFYxbIVHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x5OwsP/1cO2xD5MT1MWIhPsMq3zFGETshV 6745Zs4QLdZC5xiaItviedjzQcWQM6IuNwlmaPCR9JMJw3HnWjPEWXyJ4/Y8CQiI 6TuBICetEtjfJSrIiVivJeRDoCtTebX4IZsWaIi1CXHxcpY/aE2NZQWK1ABe8Tlo 47ItDgG0zUoJPuvgm+BRRnz3wV0oSDyXvDhl8InkP6iWXboiH8lbCxlIXg4rg434 emxhuI3r+R9gWp2UOoe3myr8gPdAE026RuBsUEuyRkYFNBnlvSPkYaV0vF4NSclP u+jMGqH2lTq7vXxHkj52HBkErk69UDZL8Q0xWMMOXg1CnC9v3sepwVyei6NeM5oE AfBMnjW3ZtKxLTmY9QXhPxvvzSBaq4tVxeXoAusy9IYIlriX/oXA37GruLhG/NjC eWXgkoxrvWiX8RvFF/iLESn9V5ouL2K8BV5JnS7PI1VALMQampRw6r/iOdbNh4ID KbmAhd1DabpfD/HMZfRQAJxH/ajH1UNvwJQLXegddd0Bi7SsbLxqY+jD/FdrNsNk cN6ebz6TvLpuKxudyR35VgtPhqA/ugvzAdlVsT6mq5QQLxqyG4r1FvLTtJ501nnu pVSAjOzfn7B+am3/be0hWJpge5ueVr7aVIhQgRgcMKKh3hXkBJAY+WZ9A1LAU1SF oByYoaAdGzf+I2LP =LlKY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 11 05:38:12 2022 Received: (at 50978-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2022 10:38:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54258 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n7EXc-00058u-5I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 05:38:12 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:45440) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n7EXW-00058K-Ax for 50978-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 05:38:11 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EAA45A; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:37:59 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jl99qpUsnY0S; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:37:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [IPv6:2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27CB6F2; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:37:58 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Xinglu Chen Subject: Re: bug#50978: "guix home describe" backtraces if "guix home" hasn't been used References: <8a0ad7369a557a7b4da2a222ba10b5bb83c6fb01.camel@telenet.be> <8735pjnoel.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:37:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8735pjnoel.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> (Xinglu Chen's message of "Sat, 02 Oct 2021 22:48:50 +0200") Message-ID: <87sftuwoai.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B6EAA45A X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Xinglu Chen skribis: > On Sat, Oct 02 2021, Maxime Devos wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> When running "guix home describe" before "guix home import" >> and before "guix build": >> >> $ guix home describe >> Backtrace: >> 7 (primiti [...] Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50978-done Cc: Maxime Devos , 50978-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Xinglu Chen skribis: > On Sat, Oct 02 2021, Maxime Devos wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> When running "guix home describe" before "guix home import" >> and before "guix build": >> >> $ guix home describe >> Backtrace: >> 7 (primiti [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Hi, Xinglu Chen skribis: > On Sat, Oct 02 2021, Maxime Devos wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> When running "guix home describe" before "guix home import" >> and before "guix build": >> >> $ guix home describe >> Backtrace: >> 7 (primitive-load "/home/[...]/.config/guix/current/b=E2=80= =A6") >> In guix/ui.scm: >> 2185:7 6 (run-guix . _) >> 2148:10 5 (run-guix-command _ . _) >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >> 1752:10 4 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) >> In guix/status.scm: >> 820:3 3 (_) >> 800:4 2 (call-with-status-report _ _) >> In guix/scripts/home.scm: >> 263:8 1 (_) >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >> 1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) >> >> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception: >> no home environment generation, nothing to describe~% >> >> I don't think a backtrace is needed here. > > This seems to be the case for =E2=80=98guix system describe=E2=80=99 too > > $ guix system describe > Backtrace: > 7 (primitive-load "/home/yoctocell/.config/guix/current/bin/gu= ix") > In guix/ui.scm: > 2185:7 6 (run-guix . _) > 2148:10 5 (run-guix-command _ . _) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 1752:10 4 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _) > In guix/status.scm: > 820:3 3 (_) > 800:4 2 (call-with-status-report _ _) > In guix/scripts/system.scm: > 1310:8 1 (_) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) > > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception: > no system generation, nothing to describe~% Fixed in a9268216e4f38189d7948cf2ecb51ad2eac7e586, thanks! Ludo'. From unknown Sat Jun 21 05:11:35 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 12:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator