GNU bug report logs -
#50960
[PATCH 00/10] Add 'guix shell' to subsume 'guix environment'
Previous Next
Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 10:22:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 02.10.2021, 12:22 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> [...]
> +(define (auto-detect-manifest opts)
> + "If OPTS do not specify packages or a manifest, load a
> \"guix.scm\" or
> +\"manifest.scm\" file from the current directory or one of its
> ancestors.
> +Return the modified OPTS."
> + (define (options-contain-payload? opts)
> + (match opts
> + (() #f)
> + ((('package . _) . _) #t)
> + ((('load . _) . _) #t)
> + ((('manifest . _) . _) #t)
> + ((('expression . _) . _) #t)
> + ((_ . rest) (options-contain-payload? rest))))
> +
> + (if (options-contain-payload? opts)
> + opts
> + (match (find-file-in-parent-directories '("guix.scm"
> "manifest.scm"))
> + (#f
> + (warning (G_ "no packages specified; creating an empty
> environment~%"))
> + opts)
> + (file
> + (info (G_ "loading environment from '~a'...~%") file)
> + (match (basename file)
> + ("guix.scm"
> + (alist-cons 'load `(package ,file) opts))
> + ("manifest.scm"
> + (alist-cons 'manifest file opts)))))))
> [...]
What would happen on the top-level of the Guix source tree or deep
inside the tree of a guile package that deals with manifests, that
aren't necessarily related to Guix? I think we should try searching
for something less ambiguous first (".guix-shell/manifest" perhaps?)
and maybe also provide further options after manifest.scm (e.g. build-
aux/guix.scm or etc/guix.scm)
WDYT?
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 210 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.