GNU bug report logs -
#50960
[PATCH 00/10] Add 'guix shell' to subsume 'guix environment'
Previous Next
Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 10:22:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #203 received at 50960 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am Freitag, den 08.10.2021, 17:45 +0200 schrieb Konrad Hinsen:
> Hi Ludo and Liliana,
>
> > To me it’s the same as ‘guix environment’, but with a slightly
> > different command-line interface; ‘guix environment’ was already
> > serves these two use cases.
>
> Indeed, but the new proposal goes much further with supporting
> interactive convenience, in particular via the controversial reading
> of guix.scm and/or manifest.scm. That's a convenience I'd like to
> have interactively, but not something I expect from an infrastructure
> tool that ends up being used in lengthy shell script. For the latter,
> the "Zen of Python wisdom" of "explicit is better than implicit"
> matters a lot. On the command line, it makes life harder, in
> particular for bad typists such as myself.
>
> > Perhaps to avoid this trouble, guix shell could read a file that
> > simply specifies which arguments to add one line at a time e.g.
> >
> > ;; .guix-shell-rc
> > --manifest=manifest.scm
>
> That's a nice idea, but again something I wouldn't want an
> infrastructure tool to do. When I use "guix environment" or "guix
> shell" in a script or workflow, I want whatever it does to be as
> independent as possible from my machine or account, except when I
> explicitly say the contrary.
People do use “emacs -Q” so there's no hard “one way or the other”
requirement. All we would need to do is offer a similar flag to
prevent reading the rc file, no?
Cheers,
Liliana
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 210 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.