GNU bug report logs -
#50960
[PATCH 00/10] Add 'guix shell' to subsume 'guix environment'
Previous Next
Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 10:22:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #107 received at 50960 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
All looks good to me; from the surface, I have not looked at the
details.
On Sat, 02 Oct 2021 at 12:21, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> 2. ‘guix shell’, without arguments, loads ‘guix.scm’ or ‘manifest.scm’
> from the current directory or one of its ancestors.
Personally, I do not like this default behaviour because explicit is
better than implicit and in the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation
to guess; as any good Zen says. :-)
Idem with the proposal ’channels.scm’ and time-machine.
> As for deprecation, I think there’s no rush. I imagine there could be
> several phases, like: initially we only mention deprecation in the manual,
> later on ‘guix environment’ starts emitting a warning, and later (I guess
> at least two years later, probably more) we ask ourselves whether to
> remove ‘guix environment’. At this point keeping it doesn’t cost us much.
Concretely, I propose this plan:
- v1.4: mention deprecation in the manual and remove from “guix help”
- v1.5: emit a warning
- v1.6: remove the command
Well, I do not see why the removal should be an issue, because there is
“guix time-machine”. To me, the real issue is to let people knowing
such change.
Moreover, I am doubtful that the exact same command-line from v1.0 is
producing the same result with v1.3 for instance. Not because of Guix
but because of the underlying packages.
For example, <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/47097>.
All the best,
simon
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 210 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.