GNU bug report logs - #50959
28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Phil Sainty <psainty <at> orcon.net.nz>

Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 09:21:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 28.0.50

Done: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Phil Sainty <psainty <at> orcon.net.nz>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 50959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org>
Subject: bug#50959: [PATCH] Re: bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 15:59:05 -0400
> In this thread, we've described many ways how that can be done.
> C-x o already "pays attention" to them, from day one, but that attention
> is somehow deemed insufficient.  So you'll have to be clearer about
> what you're suggesting exactly, i.e., "what happens when".

As an ELisp programmer, I'd want (and expect) that if I can successfully
use `st-bar` and `st-foo` in the current buffer, I will see them in the
possible completions at least when I complete `st-` and ideally in other
cases (e.g. it would be good for completion of `sba` to take `st-bar`
into account if `flex` completion style).


        Stefan





This bug report was last modified 3 years and 223 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.