From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 02 01:05:39 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2021 05:05:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57705 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWXDP-0005PF-Lx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 01:05:39 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:53740) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWXDL-0005P4-LZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 01:05:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59454) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mWXDF-0004Vs-Oy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 01:05:33 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]:33300) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mWXDC-0000Ri-0T for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 01:05:28 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id x9so832126qtv.0 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 22:05:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=+A/6B4kkQklh18X7rlnFSWE2Yu4zMMtxo7R0dZUjCh8=; b=Q7P7N69ayAdS4R/5LNZiFc3M2rLnnOmgwfXS5udBuEfJf4S5KfuDWK2zEoTDECyPs9 muYaORflsma+LRPhIqSa8RRITNTWrwCrNJzSMsNUqI3TvvA32WkWMUPhueCb5zEgU6tV jFRfJCFOWgUEaKErefLIlS6yXswNEJuhAS+DYYmEIkifMVv8LAPPJdJCJXTYM6xRjEHT TYoPpQBji3AZt7C9vGT3o7a1mCjuhta9RWIode4OSPfhcYGgDli8evJE+UxpcB1y5/Gt 4/Z+CibtiA03ar8JSnBO1uiNzgJYe2snkKKEi+p7/zelIAjLDPyFpi+KiqlRin4ztE8Z T6SA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=+A/6B4kkQklh18X7rlnFSWE2Yu4zMMtxo7R0dZUjCh8=; b=CSRiULUi2NNavYPmKmIkvFHRWpssnj0am6V+v2oB6fgV1/IcriXyMYCxhsstSJ840c HXDUFgU42CFSv5NKKU0psmi3p8PSHaN5murWx2hI+7A7TFY0MLtP5PBB+VAgWuokA8Pt xZvUIx1Hel5tWOU+fr7Gr99IxTQU2fjkhqFXOittCYuJXvXhm+I4MFJqt8Xv/rzYQf0J YfWP6eEJn6UuQmTgtckXrKpiY2Og87P6+h0+Mi/xbNWXOjyRwJZWyriPFavK9v3xfU1+ f3HNUhIHKzr4iN5JvOn8nDaT8EGaNz1kpV22bae7Ugjtk0crV5KnsXKyN82Y4TwPy5FO aiXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323Ed3jAKgtWIKNKKWuEBOgbppArEQ2rz4CtIE2uA7kVd/GmdDo oZ09fOXxrZxyhGjBu+J9hY2Jyr5dO70= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjKp8vzmk4dlgzolyt6BDzvgVAOWLa5MzpJYemNUyl+QLm/SlJPR1+8h5yidquU8GNuQjGNg== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7059:: with SMTP id y25mr1767878qtm.404.1633151123285; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 22:05:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-154-64.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.154.64]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v5sm4120443qkh.17.2021.10.01.22.05.22 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 01 Oct 2021 22:05:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: bug-guix Subject: efl and others are broken on staging (need to fix propagation of librsvg) Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2021 01:05:21 -0400 Message-ID: <874ka0584u.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::835; envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt1-x835.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hello, This is to not forget about this bug I introduced when attempting to ensure gdk-pixbuf (the non-rsvg version we have) was not propagated to prevent confusion (such as the lack of SVG support) stemming from mixing both variants when creating environments. I have in my mind that gdk-pixbuf+svg should be renamed to gdk-pixbuf; we could keep gdk-pixbuf as gdk-pixbuf-minimal if there's a need but the obvious choice for gdk-pixbuf should be the one with SVG support in my opinion. Thanks, Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 10 00:54:56 2021 Received: (at 50957-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Oct 2021 04:54:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54322 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mZQrQ-0001Fp-LP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 00:54:56 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:40539) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mZQrM-0001Fa-So for 50957-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 00:54:54 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f169.google.com with SMTP id o12so1669875qtq.7 for <50957-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 21:54:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=B3GU+pwZQa/97lYI+Q+5Tsg8EVJVgKBzzfJ1JQhmWyU=; b=Il5MaACLS+R2qVvowq5AcMQBRIHt1i2xtObFX7mOmS53+NGGaUpzfD3YKlHCaObOcf DQzhjkC5MvVVHOqhK+0q2YkTeMN+KdrOuEYtL/yz7BunujqISyZHcCEgQXlP5Ci24Vaa i6LvAhgHGtsnkdMVHcVkNEBWrG9Eup9YAeG5isenxS71LrQfJ8u8QRyuIwI0SMmsO0yf T+F5b2Wb/yo57uydAtjkhpCmyK9SmHVwRiQwP8JC9LtBfga33q/8RT8XwA6/pfI1SZfB 8N3xOWIWX76XWhVEl9IGoQ2JPkLZ3enGBcIMQbbOLdXh5SmdHNRS/MDSkde2epAupyz2 x3Wg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=B3GU+pwZQa/97lYI+Q+5Tsg8EVJVgKBzzfJ1JQhmWyU=; b=EmrZOYUstyw9cxz3oIkVGSRwLVMUDmx92sJbHflVqZjrPX9GuTh2AKFvlhwKxaOWHl kXv5BmhEkhCWBXf3Se0MWm9npUttXvLZ8T72ILkPGvR9QPkgfxvSNowD2ztXed27QyzG 3s09QSjUarnr1RJA6OogMp3oKXRB/CXJ2Sk3DpjilVR5UiZVXDBlb2cRC3EAqD6SyobU 8AuWWI42mw4lHJlyVO+pxf1o0cSvHdyZ5xuhq9baW1mxuRjAcZGLxUd1TM7JRYgfnCuE 412EPzJceB6RoxIwuKg8SrYC/B4UFkOSBNQK0HNqYEHGhiuWyEmwA+rS7ulrjiTcrTZC NC6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vwabA+ZMwwzXsfxeyqofd7Mu2br2UWrc+cchx+/5ZaPbTsZa3 Yyv/4J3jm7sItMV+NKEfPVI+GCG1jUo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyEm/VnxwFaey/HBq1tV52objS7zWwO/2E+2a1ITRh0vCSCeF8/z6pTGd7O6OiyGbzi/a0Kow== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:4ce:: with SMTP id q14mr7347723qtx.52.1633841686925; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 21:54:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-136-160.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.136.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m17sm2537589qtx.62.2021.10.09.21.54.46 for <50957-done@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 09 Oct 2021 21:54:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: 50957-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#50957: efl and others are broken on staging (need to fix propagation of librsvg) References: <874ka0584u.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 00:54:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <874ka0584u.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Sat, 02 Oct 2021 01:05:21 -0400") Message-ID: <871r4t32ei.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50957-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Fixed with commit f4271bbd79. Closing. Thanks, Maxim From unknown Sat Jun 14 19:03:53 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 12:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator