From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 01 10:37:28 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2021 14:37:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57075 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWJf8-00065M-PL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 10:37:28 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:37502) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWJf5-000656-V5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 10:37:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47514) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mWJf5-0007Gh-G1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 10:37:19 -0400 Received: from mail.ftbfs.org ([52.8.68.13]:45248 helo=aws.ftbfs.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mWJf3-0001pE-W8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 10:37:19 -0400 Received: from ip68-228-72-85.oc.oc.cox.net ([68.228.72.85] helo=localhost.localdomain) by aws.ftbfs.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWJew-005AG8-Oj; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 14:37:11 +0000 From: Matthew James Kraai To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] etc: Do not clean guix-gc.timer Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 07:37:06 -0700 Message-Id: <20211001143706.1673-1-kraai@ftbfs.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No (score -2.9): Spam detection software, running on the system "aws.ftbfs.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: * nix/local.mk (dist_systemdservice_DATA): New. (nodist_systemdservice_DATA): Remove guix-gc.timer. (EXTRA_DIST): Remove guix-gc.timer. --- nix/local.mk | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 d [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Received-SPF: pass client-ip=52.8.68.13; envelope-from=kraai@ftbfs.org; helo=aws.ftbfs.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Matthew James Kraai X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) * nix/local.mk (dist_systemdservice_DATA): New. (nodist_systemdservice_DATA): Remove guix-gc.timer. (EXTRA_DIST): Remove guix-gc.timer. --- nix/local.mk | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/nix/local.mk b/nix/local.mk index d6b4d7faeb..b0cce85cab 100644 --- a/nix/local.mk +++ b/nix/local.mk @@ -150,12 +150,13 @@ noinst_HEADERS = \ # The '.service' files for systemd. systemdservicedir = $(libdir)/systemd/system +dist_systemdservice_DATA = \ + etc/guix-gc.timer nodist_systemdservice_DATA = \ etc/gnu-store.mount \ etc/guix-daemon.service \ etc/guix-publish.service \ - etc/guix-gc.service \ - etc/guix-gc.timer + etc/guix-gc.service etc/%.mount: etc/%.mount.in \ $(top_builddir)/config.status @@ -219,7 +220,6 @@ EXTRA_DIST += \ etc/guix-publish.service.in \ etc/guix-publish.conf.in \ etc/guix-gc.service.in \ - etc/guix-gc.timer \ etc/init.d/guix-daemon.in \ etc/openrc/guix-daemon.in -- 2.33.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 02 13:04:48 2021 Received: (at 50938) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2021 17:04:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60496 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWiRM-0002pu-Jw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 13:04:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35760) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWiRK-0002pf-LB for 50938@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 13:04:47 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57238) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mWiRF-0003bU-9Q; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 13:04:41 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:45b5:a14a:5c75:5737] (port=59296 helo=meije) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mWiRE-0002mL-Pb; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 13:04:41 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Matthew James Kraai Subject: Re: bug#50938: [PATCH] etc: Do not clean guix-gc.timer References: <20211001143706.1673-1-kraai@ftbfs.org> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2021 17:04:38 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20211001143706.1673-1-kraai@ftbfs.org> (Matthew James Kraai's message of "Fri, 1 Oct 2021 07:37:06 -0700") Message-ID: <87ee93we6x.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50938 Cc: 50938@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, > - etc/guix-gc.timer Commit 8579304e8f4deaca33b816b2d56af1d814a03bde already removes guix-gc.timer from the nodist_systemdservice_DATA list. > etc/guix-gc.service.in \ > - etc/guix-gc.timer \ > etc/init.d/guix-daemon.in \ > etc/openrc/guix-daemon.in Why should we move guix-gc.timer from EXTRA_DIST to dist_systemdservice_DATA? Thanks, Mathieu From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 02 16:27:24 2021 Received: (at 50938) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2021 20:27:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60694 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWlbQ-0001rP-M1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 16:27:24 -0400 Received: from mail.ftbfs.org ([52.8.68.13]:14154 helo=aws.ftbfs.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWlbP-0001rD-4p for 50938@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 16:27:23 -0400 Received: from ip68-228-72-85.oc.oc.cox.net ([68.228.72.85] helo=[192.168.1.20]) by aws.ftbfs.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWlbJ-005JGN-1T for 50938@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 20:27:17 +0000 Subject: Fwd: bug#50938: [PATCH] etc: Do not clean guix-gc.timer References: <1e816429-e977-bec0-5c92-5dc970f835fb@ftbfs.org> To: 50938@debbugs.gnu.org From: Matthew James Kraai X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <1e816429-e977-bec0-5c92-5dc970f835fb@ftbfs.org> Message-ID: <1668e5a7-b12b-e6bd-74f5-646580da4143@ftbfs.org> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 13:27:16 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1e816429-e977-bec0-5c92-5dc970f835fb@ftbfs.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------BC44FFC06E9A67E5E2FC8B40" Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Status: No (score -2.9): Spam detection software, running on the system "aws.ftbfs.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: bug#50938: [PATCH] etc: Do not clean guix-gc.timer Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 13:26:04 -0700 From: Matthew James Kraai To: Mathieu Othaceh [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50938 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------BC44FFC06E9A67E5E2FC8B40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: bug#50938: [PATCH] etc: Do not clean guix-gc.timer Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 13:26:04 -0700 From: Matthew James Kraai To: Mathieu Othacehe Hi, On 10/2/21 10:04 AM, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > Hello, > >> - etc/guix-gc.timer > Commit 8579304e8f4deaca33b816b2d56af1d814a03bde already removes > guix-gc.timer from the nodist_systemdservice_DATA list. > >> etc/guix-gc.service.in \ >> - etc/guix-gc.timer \ >> etc/init.d/guix-daemon.in \ >> etc/openrc/guix-daemon.in > Why should we move guix-gc.timer from EXTRA_DIST to > dist_systemdservice_DATA? I think it has to be in dist_systemdservice_DATA in order to be installed.  Is that not the case? Matt --------------BC44FFC06E9A67E5E2FC8B40 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: bug#50938: [PATCH] etc: Do not clean guix-gc.timer
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 13:26:04 -0700
From: Matthew James Kraai <kraai@ftbfs.org>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org>


Hi,

On 10/2/21 10:04 AM, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
Hello,

- etc/guix-gc.timer
Commit 8579304e8f4deaca33b816b2d56af1d814a03bde already removes
guix-gc.timer from the nodist_systemdservice_DATA list.

etc/guix-gc.service.in \
- etc/guix-gc.timer \
etc/init.d/guix-daemon.in \
etc/openrc/guix-daemon.in
Why should we move guix-gc.timer from EXTRA_DIST to
dist_systemdservice_DATA?

I think it has to be in dist_systemdservice_DATA in order to be installed.  Is that not the case?

Matt

--------------BC44FFC06E9A67E5E2FC8B40-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 03 15:39:52 2021 Received: (at 50938-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2021 19:39:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35016 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mX7Kx-0000i4-T8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2021 15:39:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36666) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mX7Kv-0000hn-83 for 50938-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2021 15:39:50 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55520) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mX7Kp-0005j7-Kd; Sun, 03 Oct 2021 15:39:43 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:45b5:a14a:5c75:5737] (port=59324 helo=meije) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mX7Ko-0003BL-VC; Sun, 03 Oct 2021 15:39:43 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Matthew James Kraai Subject: Re: bug#50938: [PATCH] etc: Do not clean guix-gc.timer References: <1e816429-e977-bec0-5c92-5dc970f835fb@ftbfs.org> <1668e5a7-b12b-e6bd-74f5-646580da4143@ftbfs.org> Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2021 19:39:39 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1668e5a7-b12b-e6bd-74f5-646580da4143@ftbfs.org> (Matthew James Kraai's message of "Sat, 2 Oct 2021 13:27:16 -0700") Message-ID: <8735phsxs4.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50938-done Cc: 50938-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hey Matt, > I think it has to be in dist_systemdservice_DATA in order to be > installed. Is that not the case? Looks like having this file in the EXTRA_DIST list is enough to have it installed. I think we can close this one. Thanks, Mathieu From unknown Sat Sep 13 04:54:45 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator