GNU bug report logs -
#50849
28.0.50; Proposal for Emacs daemon to signal when being busy
Previous Next
Reported by: Jean Louis <bugs <at> gnu.support>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:28:02 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Found in version 28.0.50
Fixed in version 29.1
Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, stefankangas <at> gmail.com,
> 50849 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bugs <at> gnu.support, visuweshm <at> gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 16:19:40 +0200
>
> >>>>> On Thu, 08 Sep 2022 17:15:09 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:
>
> >> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
> >> Cc: stefankangas <at> gmail.com, rpluim <at> gmail.com, 50849 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
> >> bugs <at> gnu.support, visuweshm <at> gmail.com
> >> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 16:11:32 +0200
> >>
> >> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > ??? We already added --timeout, so what do you mean by that?
> >>
> >> I don't expect anybody to type --timeout either, but I can see that it
> >> might be useful when scripting, for instance. --give-me-feedback, on
> >> the other hand, would never be used.
>
> Eli> I think there's some misunderstanding: I wasn't taking about anything
> Eli> called --give-me-feedback.
>
> So if we set DEFAULT_TIMEOUT to 0, people who do nothing get no
> messages, and people who do --timeout get messages. I think that
> satisfies Eliʼs concern about compatibility
Yes, I think so.
> (Iʼd even go so far as not setting the timeout at all if itʼs not
> requested. Why yes, I am paranoid about changing old code).
I agree.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 256 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.