GNU bug report logs -
#50733
28.0.1; project-find-regexp can block Emacs for a long time
Previous Next
Full log
Message #11 received at 50733 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru> writes:
>
> IIRC you are using macOS. I received another report recently that
> find/grep based tooling, and project-find-regexp in particular, are
> pretty slow on that OS.
Yes, this is on macOS.
>
> When you say "block for a long time", how long are we talking about?
>>
> To try it, evaluate
>
> (benchmark 1 '(project-find-regexp "new-collection"))
I usually work on a monorepo with ~67000 tracked files (many of them big
binary files). Here's what I get when using ripgrep as the xref search
program:
Elapsed time: 36.087181s (8.067474s in 22 GCs)
Running the same search with ripgrep from the command line takes around
6 seconds.
>
> Another benchmark to try is
>
> (benchmark 1 '(project-files (project-current)))
Elapsed time: 1.590223s (0.432372s in 1 GCs)
Here's an ELisp profile of the first benchmark:
8696 78% - command-execute
8696 78% - call-interactively
8493 76% - funcall-interactively
8480 76% - eval-expression
8479 76% - eval
8479 76% - project-find-regexp
8227 74% - xref--show-xrefs
8227 74% - xref--show-xref-buffer
5584 50% - #<compiled 0x140b5a40100bafc6>
5584 50% - apply
5584 50% - project--find-regexp-in-files
5574 50% - xref-matches-in-files
3016 27% - xref--convert-hits
3000 27% - mapcan
2992 27% - #<compiled -0x6cdcd56218925c3>
2734 24% - xref--collect-matches
2094 18% - xref--collect-matches-1
800 7% + xref-make-match
774 7% + xref-make-file-location
104 0% xref--find-file-buffer
80 0% file-remote-p
51 0% xref--regexp-syntax-dependent-p
906 8% + xref--process-file-region
331 2% sort
1413 12% + xref--analyze
1230 11% + xref--show-common-initialize
249 2% + project-files
3 0% + project-current
9 0% + minibuffer-complete
4 0% + execute-extended-command
203 1% + byte-code
2314 20% - ...
2314 20% Automatic GC
27 0% + timer-event-handler
The search time is reduced when I use a more specific search term,
presumably because the number of results is lower and the Elisp
post-processing takes less time. Here's what I got, for example, when I
search for something with results from only one file:
Elapsed time: 6.859815s (0.864738s in 2 GCs)
Compared to the time taken by the same query from the command line
(6.5s) shows that the Elisp post-processing time is probably negligible
in this scenario.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 261 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.