GNU bug report logs - #50727
Contradictory conventions with new command kbd-macro-display

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>

Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 23:23:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #11 received at 50727 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, 50727 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, marcowahlsoft <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#50727: Contradictory conventions with new command
 kbd-macro-display
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 09:16:51 +0300
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:22:26 -0700
> Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, marcowahlsoft <at> gmail.com
> 
>     The key sequences [C-x C-k 0] through [C-x C-k 9] and [C-x C-k A]
>     through [C-x C-k Z] are reserved for user bindings, and to bind to
>     one of these sequences, just enter the digit or letter, rather than
>     the whole sequence.

Regardless of the main issue here, why does this doc string use this
strange notation for key sequences?  What is the meaning of the
brackets here, and why don't we use `..' as usual?




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 240 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.