GNU bug report logs - #5072
23.1.50; Eshell fail with sudo command

Previous Next

Full log

Message #20 received at 5072 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 5072 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
        Thierry Volpiatto <thierry.volpiatto <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#5072: 23.1.50; Eshell fail with sudo command
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:28:53 +0100

Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> I've added recently an eshell implementation for su and sudo, using
>> Tramp. This requires to run bash, indeed.
>
> What is the advantage?

Imagine, you are on a remote machine, and you want to call a Lisp
function, accessing a file with root permissions. In eshell, you do:

     ~ $ cd /ssh:user <at> remotehost:/etc
     /ssh:user <at> remotehost:/etc $ sudo find-file shadow

>> In order to keep your original behaviour, you shall call
>> ,----
>> | *sudo emerge -av somepackage
>> `----
>
> Couldn't your code fail more gracefully and transparently fallback on
> running the bare `sudo'?

That is the eshell built-in approach to suppress command emulation. You
can also apply it to "ls" or "du" or whatever command available in
eshell implementation(1). I wouldn't change it; eshell users know this
approach, likely (2).

Maybe more useful would be to improve Tramp, calling a command via
start-file-process directly (without opening a shell first). This is
already on my todo list, but it isn't simple; it needs basic changes.

At least I will move the eshell related information in etc/NEWS to the
"user visible changes" section.

(1): Check for "eshell/*" Lisp functions.

(2): eshell documentation is very poor. Even this is not documented; I
will improve it next days.

>         Stefan

Best regards, Michael.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.