From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 19 20:25:49 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2021 00:25:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40322 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mS781-0006Pa-CG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 20:25:49 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:34494) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mS5wY-0004aE-PG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:09:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38988) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mS5wY-0003av-HY for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:09:54 -0400 Received: from vps-cc563b24.vps.ovh.us ([135.148.27.104]:56866 helo=mail.parabolas.xyz) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mS5wX-0006Gp-9D for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:09:54 -0400 Received: from localhost (104-55-33-38.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [104.55.33.38]) by mail.parabolas.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78A11160007 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 23:09:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=parabolas.xyz; s=mail; t=1632092990; bh=PU1ypTb2brtFMoq9V61kWQklGfoSmrqGKkdx2YV1S+E=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=hSFf94i9SvaTE16U0k8GXxQS+DoKM6MuOBMojLGz9dBOHAJeH7fUdDsn18MptX+4C wHZ1jRl9cLxYrmGrkPSkMc+fb05bZdrPaMljUhqmkDLI6quy+A3UAfYowi+AH+xLgD b4mJ5DEVL+OED+pH7b/w9wsPzhMwmX6xzLlNy3oJYsSvtAbN7ms/1KsxbS3R4XycQ+ qW0CGpMbL04fAn9lEHcwzWhBnKq+VjnKypOkzo1ZYxlonCchPFil8EWjPW2l/0MDYi ObRmwUt1NxnCeXC7YjcDNsqPCZTKUgVaQhkJ9WRZ/nlLGGKNZ9Qc3iR+HeGqAl4Ii9 hPhg+TlgGJgzQ== Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 16:09:49 -0700 From: william To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Subject: pwd: options with "--" (multiple dashes) return bad option Message-ID: <20210919230949.5cirrbbwacaatdpb@calculum.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=135.148.27.104; envelope-from=william@parabolas.xyz; helo=mail.parabolas.xyz X-Spam_score_int: 51 X-Spam_score: 5.1 X-Spam_bar: +++++ X-Spam_report: (5.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.499, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=1.999, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: reject X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: coreutils version 8.32 The commands pwd --version Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: parabolas.xyz (xyz)] 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom; id=william%40parabolas.xyz; ip=209.51.188.17; r=debbugs.gnu.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 20:25:48 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) coreutils version 8.32 The commands pwd --version and pwd --help return pwd: bad option: -v pwd: bad option: -h From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 19 21:06:59 2021 Received: (at 50691) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2021 01:06:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40346 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mS7lr-000184-3d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 21:06:59 -0400 Received: from ishtar.tlinx.org ([173.164.175.65]:49214 helo=Ishtar.sc.tlinx.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mS7lo-00017u-Iw for 50691@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 21:06:57 -0400 Received: from [192.168.3.12] (Athenae [192.168.3.12]) by Ishtar.sc.tlinx.org (8.14.7/8.14.4/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id 18K15xZv025143; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 18:06:01 -0700 Message-ID: <6147DE69.9050205@tlinx.org> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 18:05:45 -0700 From: L A Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: william , Coreutils Subject: Re: bug#50691: pwd: options with "--" (multiple dashes) return bad option References: <20210919230949.5cirrbbwacaatdpb@calculum.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20210919230949.5cirrbbwacaatdpb@calculum.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50691 Cc: 50691@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Try 'command pwd --version' On 2021/09/19 16:09, william wrote: > coreutils version 8.32 > > The commands > > pwd --version > > and > > pwd --help > > return > > pwd: bad option: -v > pwd: bad option: -h > > > From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 19 21:40:29 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2021 01:40:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40381 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mS8IG-0001uN-Qj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 21:40:29 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:59752) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mS80o-0001U7-Ji for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 21:22:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51278) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mS80o-0001Oz-16 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 21:22:26 -0400 Received: from vps-cc563b24.vps.ovh.us ([135.148.27.104]:57472 helo=mail.parabolas.xyz) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mS80l-00033R-3y for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 21:22:25 -0400 Received: from localhost (104-55-33-38.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [104.55.33.38]) by mail.parabolas.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5350A160007; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 01:22:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=parabolas.xyz; s=mail; t=1632100941; bh=gRgWba0R/wm2cuDyvNxX2MjME2hxUx2kkIYg28Imv58=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GDGNy2AaM8+WE9yWpSKkgILs1t8SYBiav3f/Ra+ziXkDfktOHd4HPvGasdoy8bzii MqEVo6I0xEQYefe4FTTnrah6E2zlN178B4gK5r0ND7Mt2a6TOOK1Qsjg7ORp65e2NS bOF05xEsqYn72AbStumzAxM5dqSZZPAAFzVeWccHOGwDChQVAANQ7AoxFyAHdhFJYZ UFNDmKrzMm2lC87Gp02ndKThNJdZXmrm1R6H7Z1wmLucsXetZZxnozRF03whut6bKA Ayuc1gPjIDImRptY/G5qxDHXcTtiDQdLf15cbxSVkgBJGZZGUwEGCBoEyAryzhIw1I VHK0mVD7KXW8A== Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 18:22:20 -0700 From: william To: L A Walsh Subject: Re: bug#50691: pwd: options with "--" (multiple dashes) return bad option Message-ID: <20210920012220.7iibzhfremmwlwxw@calculum.localdomain> References: <20210919230949.5cirrbbwacaatdpb@calculum.localdomain> <6147DE69.9050205@tlinx.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6147DE69.9050205@tlinx.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=135.148.27.104; envelope-from=william@parabolas.xyz; helo=mail.parabolas.xyz X-Spam_score_int: 23 X-Spam_score: 2.3 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam_report: (2.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.499, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: That does the trick. Do you know why command is necessary for it to recognize the option? On 21/09/19 06:05PM, L A Walsh wrote: > Try 'command pwd --version' > > On 2021/09/19 16:09, william wrote: > > coreutils version 8.32 > > > > The commands > > > > pwd --version > > > > and > > > > pw [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: parabolas.xyz (xyz)] 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom; id=william%40parabolas.xyz; ip=209.51.188.17; r=debbugs.gnu.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 21:40:27 -0400 Cc: Coreutils , 50691@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: That does the trick. Do you know why command is necessary for it to recognize the option? On 21/09/19 06:05PM, L A Walsh wrote: > Try 'command pwd --version' > > On 2021/09/19 16:09, william wrote: > > coreutils version 8.32 > > > > The commands > > > > pwd --version > > > > and > > > > pw [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: parabolas.xyz (xyz)] 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=william%40parabolas.xyz;ip=209.51.188.17;r=debbugs.gnu.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager That does the trick. Do you know why command is necessary for it to recognize the option? On 21/09/19 06:05PM, L A Walsh wrote: > Try 'command pwd --version' > > On 2021/09/19 16:09, william wrote: > > coreutils version 8.32 > > > > The commands > > > > pwd --version > > > > and > > > > pwd --help > > > > return > > > > pwd: bad option: -v > > pwd: bad option: -h > > > > > > From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 19 22:07:10 2021 Received: (at 50691-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2021 02:07:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40391 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mS8i6-0002Zd-Gt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 22:07:10 -0400 Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:50786) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mS8i4-0002ZQ-6e for 50691-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 22:07:09 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F9016013A; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:07:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id HCAyI8HlrBpw; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:07:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6EB16013C; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:07:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 5e7XmIhHsQ3N; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:07:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-172-91-119-151.socal.res.rr.com [172.91.119.151]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4269E16013A; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:07:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#50691: pwd: options with "--" (multiple dashes) return bad option To: william , L A Walsh References: <20210919230949.5cirrbbwacaatdpb@calculum.localdomain> <6147DE69.9050205@tlinx.org> <20210920012220.7iibzhfremmwlwxw@calculum.localdomain> From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <427ff7e5-1856-0fb9-7d85-56f26ebc1275@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:07:00 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210920012220.7iibzhfremmwlwxw@calculum.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50691-done Cc: 50691-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) On 9/19/21 6:22 PM, william wrote: > Do you know why command is necessary for it to recognize the option? Without 'command', you're using the builtin shell command rather than coreutils pwd. Closing the bug report, as this isn't a coreutils bug. From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:27:02 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:24:10 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator