From unknown Sat Sep 20 07:39:19 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50671: 28.0.50; ido-mode *Ido Completions* buffer not compact and rebuilt on second TAB Resent-From: Y. E. Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 50671 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 50671@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Reply-To: "Y. E." Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.163204316327721 (code B ref -1); Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:20:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2021 09:19:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37466 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mRsyp-0007D3-1B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 05:19:23 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:35636) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mRsyn-0007Cw-Ni for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 05:19:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52138) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mRsyn-0005De-1r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 05:19:21 -0400 Received: from out2.migadu.com ([188.165.223.204]:25401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mRsyh-0008Fv-RX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 05:19:19 -0400 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ego.team; s=key1; t=1632043151; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type; bh=Yjl/WOBLqhl1MiQCMtgmgaD4jJwIYrj2kfTBgjjePNQ=; b=DVW+C+4BbNvuu2iy6hBDPCoYNXOyebKcdjlJNnpUuU/RfUyw4fmi1B4Ecs4T+SZR/J7gTq yNpRbxnHRhp5543swYX5aoEqxDql+34NW3ri1R06f2g6JN0kRCUGpQoZDpFGYqpc/Mm9Wx ftuyZ/C6dP79nXpq+u5aB5jSTimbHpc= From: Y. E. Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 12:19:10 +0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: yuga@ego.team Received-SPF: pass client-ip=188.165.223.204; envelope-from=yet@ego.team; helo=out2.migadu.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Hello, Steps to reproduce: 1. emacs -Q 2. C-x C-f ~/.emacs.d/ - See compact *Completions* buffer. - No changes on the second hit. 3. M-x ido-mode 4. C-x C-f ~/.emacs.d/ - See not compact *Ido Completions* buffer. - Note the completions list is re-built on the second hit. The expected behavior would be for *Ido Completions* buffer to behave similarly to the *Completions* buffer: to be compact and not change on sequential hits. A note: To fix the compactness issue, I currently use this workaround: (customize-set-variable 'display-buffer-alist '(("\\*Ido Completions\\*" (display-buffer-reuse-window display-buffer-at-bottom) (window-height . fit-window-to-buffer)))) Thank you for looking into this. In GNU Emacs 28.0.50 (build 14, x86_64-apple-darwin18.7.0, NS appkit-1671.60 Version 10.14.6 (Build 18G9216)) Repository revision: 9ca737c4198c5e7faef7a74de7b1e84b11e1dbeb Repository branch: master From unknown Sat Sep 20 07:39:19 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50671: 28.0.50; ido-mode *Ido Completions* buffer not compact and rebuilt on second TAB Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50671 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Y. E. Cc: 50671@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 50671-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50671.16615154012412 (code B ref 50671); Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:04:02 +0000 Received: (at 50671) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2022 12:03:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52536 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oRY3V-0000cq-60 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:03:21 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:43468) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oRY3T-0000ca-6m for 50671@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:03:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ZGuNAYq2BirZcBHPpKT6RrJBKDqp7fBfzplrUbRQQIY=; b=Fyhoo2q1jR/1NVSsOhYYst7Vgm jH6Bj1d/6dlSOq52S9zGSWhA6Cealc1grZQmvrzSHOld5QYkq7S6L5N/XUDY6nXmtMW1UO4poj6ii AaMl5JV+WIAvaRGndFRShDOeMMQfH6ZGC+Tm3jk3lYUelZTifiPM+OKg1Zybt/DgI3xY=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oRY3K-0000uf-Dv; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 14:03:12 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: (Y. E.'s message of "Sun, 19 Sep 2021 12:19:10 +0300") References: X-Now-Playing: David Sylvian's _Dead Bees on a Cake_: "Pollen Path" Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 14:03:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87zgfrb4aq.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Y. E. writes: > The expected behavior would be for *Ido Completions* buffer to behave > similarly to the *Completions* buffer: to be compact and not change on > sequential hits. I've now fixed this in Emacs 29. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Y. E. writes: > The expected behavior would be for *Ido Completions* buffer to behave > similarly to the *Completions* buffer: to be compact and not change on > sequential hits. I've now fixed this in Emacs 29. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 26 08:03:30 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2022 12:03:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52539 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oRY3e-0000dD-Ct for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:03:30 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:43482) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oRY3b-0000cy-Ru for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:03:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=pGIN7oBdeplbRlXEJM3PJMe6laHwC2RHRxwE35tccd4=; b=fZ0Sxjt73nlmwe86wDvCvQ+KE8 iFvzX1IfecHANTFkob9gMkb3TM+WmgmiezCJiE1IORBHzD6rx54XqFwuLFVPDaPTrqusZ74F0Qosu oWDnsiWh24/nk1jwhEm4WHpST0Utjh71qYLoD8IlDCJl7GIRKPwYUUY40J21aOWbDGfQ=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oRY3Q-0000ut-50 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 14:03:22 +0200 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 14:03:15 +0200 Message-Id: <87y1vbb4ak.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #50671 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 50671 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 50671 29.1 quit