GNU bug report logs -
#50606
Add support for other formats of Guix channels
Previous Next
Reported by: EuAndreh <eu <at> euandre.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 17:32:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: wontfix
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
EuAndreh <eu <at> euandre.org> skribis:
> My proposal was a little more crude: get the channel code from a tarball. In
> this model there are no authentications with fingerprint or signed commits,
> neither "guix pull" would know much about the before/after state of a channel
> besides comparing the checksum of the whole tarball.
>
> This lower level abstraction is much less sofisticated, and would probably mean
> refetching and rebuilding from tarball-backed channels than Git channels. But
> this also means that the requirement is lower, and much more universal: a
> tarball file served over HTTP, compared to a specific Git HTTP protocol.
Note that we already have -L and GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH as an alternative to
full-blown channels. I’d recommend using that when in need of a
lightweight alternative. How does that sound?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 244 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.