From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 10 05:36:34 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2021 09:36:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36895 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mOcxV-0006Ns-R7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 05:36:34 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:50726) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mOcxU-0006Nl-OW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 05:36:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOcxU-0007Gs-Do for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 05:36:32 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:40232) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOcxS-0007qj-JR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 05:36:32 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [141.226.169.107]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF65F40363 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:34:21 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: packages->manifest can lose the desired package output Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: bug-guix@gnu.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7nTkPh+igbN6Fl4v" Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.62.234.194; envelope-from=efraim@flashner.co.il; helo=flashner.co.il X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --7nTkPh+igbN6Fl4v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've been fighting my manifest to try to get "git" and "git:send-email" both included, while using package transformations. For the sake of brevity, here's a stripped down version of my manifest: (packages->manifest (map specification->package+output '("git" "git:send-email"))) Here's what I learned from some experimentation: (cmd)scheme@(guile-user)> (specification->package+output "git:send-email") $14 =3D # $15 =3D "send-email" (ins)scheme@(guile-user)> (list (specification->package+output "git:send-em= ail")) $16 =3D (#) (ins)scheme@(guile-user)> (list (specification->package+output "git")) $17 =3D (#) Meanwhile, (specifications->manifest '("git" "git:send-email")) does actually return a manifest with both the "out" and the "send-email" outputs of git. (package->manifest-entry (specification->package+output "git:send-email")) returns a manifest entry for "git:out" and (package->manifest-entry git "send-email") returns a manifest entry for "git:send-email". --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=A8=D7=A0=D7=A9=D7=9C=D7=A4 = =D7=9D=D7=99=D7=A8=D7=A4=D7=90 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --7nTkPh+igbN6Fl4v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmE7JpoACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1GJExAAwSPep8IoUJG9iNrorT79B05CGTrfztw83PndQ02WU3fH5Z6QhFnB3jIU 806V7K87uSDurp2vS8uOzZPAF59CBVGXKkm/CMdBiqvKrN5td7gUOR7EWICy2E4R 0gGzlfIu1ESdPSTd1r3NL7JLjjbTMi5WE6P0YstZn74SZklNQ6z700jvMyQY0XK8 1pbDyeB15SLiw40apOn1uhfctfLmZUpCvEk2vFnqLGSPC3zHDzOzERfoOrQJyXHQ kVkWwu+1jFJE0rGH7UieDdyqp5nXmyOqThhtV1dInoPgrmDjrtv/FQwpzsl73c8+ 7XLWT3H9yDyfyrBevx0bT/ySBdnJKieuEqencOL/4WZo3PW8sG51GUBj9qwuQuzB r72U+F51AOKukoFNeehN8og35XR4zF3HFrZSM2rYffhOWv6PpBrrTMJ2GX2IJyf2 cqVjlgIMPx7X6pRphiO8m3ULmYU2R3eBqx9uuqhOhmETGoHlNvFBE9tkCIeYgBNe Dc2pXlmBIpXYq3QBZelBzIB3jOvgHhhn5I/P951ZBwFroLIZkLOVpsqhSFod/RX0 jCNRL0AmS0UzSIupDLhaWDiuzYJLoKInGfV66mIroVxy56iO+gj+osBqnW5/XRGD sjb3LmXRIXw+N6RdklfUM7ZUU71f+57zxEdO+mb3jdtu9ruVFXU= =+1SO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7nTkPh+igbN6Fl4v-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 10 10:26:35 2021 Received: (at 50501) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2021 14:26:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38919 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mOhUB-0000P2-0U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:26:35 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com ([209.85.128.66]:43770) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mOhU8-0000Oo-AR for 50501@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:26:33 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f66.google.com with SMTP id n7-20020a05600c3b8700b002f8ca941d89so1526388wms.2 for <50501@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 07:26:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6AVqCgv9mfnuGYJLZLOCxs6bez16wbzRyD8M4EqcmFU=; b=Y9L7yr26gO7OrmdBBxjKUsgWU/TKBSIVwGgpLx6Ttl/iMsc/7/2xQ6oG0HrItI34CC g4eaFw2Go+D3xOxzbfoIM7AfkLWKTn7cHCaDmYW46xsNZOwSf54jDRpfwbsN19Ieruvy 8N+EzBqNadM/WXowGVhQHU+9GnLNsuHdhugXOIFO0N5cg7q5vNv487FmMvGqrRkKVC4d S7pv/3KZtetxZXrP/GdVVDDfxi/uBzLVOuyHCPTgFMLeNo8p9ctHCLia4wTJaIyIuoWh JkkQgEon6JhXMDgXXIRr7XIR+pQTTQ0mTUc/IdsuzTzDjkFF+4SgcrwzGok/gMxjkGfA /sTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6AVqCgv9mfnuGYJLZLOCxs6bez16wbzRyD8M4EqcmFU=; b=5GWDeWG/zjCvC+EGkAThRUEJ+MgBcy+P5g31ECUeQeC5fpt3PycyRZgvnjozJcFw7q F0C6F+IiglXrKfERqb6XeUyyPh4h+Ux8C+kmeJpiRr6D2MGtU6OQWzyPOq0pZE4nf8rm D5XxFRKDlZ8VA6CyYpHzXciq1gS0CtBqGd0eOmiJKxNyRo0Bs7lQy6jSAdxoIN0Skwl3 95/gxNfU2bNGOVxe6suoRcg2/9HA7/iLITuBw8tnrhXSyf5IpVBKRTbQ0v4w39/Ke6gp mlO0iYdgK5pj4L76Jr3ukmT/EqD6ccz9LwLiu2zyV2qk1PgKOhNUFv1sXXk+OO2ki75G uICg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530i9migoKJWkFeJDt8Ia3/78X8ZY/Prwaxxos7ev6KieY2hBpHt sVtJA5PFwRRulGE1KB50X089OrHNupI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwHnECq3wP3G9gNjS+/1MKQj5aL0YSkan7JDcXuWFQA6GyfVGl20Xdz6vw/7af8RSiDnFslKQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4406:: with SMTP id r6mr8780133wma.150.1631283986763; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 07:26:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nijino.fritz.box (85-127-52-93.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.52.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b22sm4482906wmn.18.2021.09.10.07.26.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 10 Sep 2021 07:26:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: packages->manifest can lose the desired package output From: Liliana Marie Prikler To: Efraim Flashner , 50501@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:26:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50501 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Efraim, Am Freitag, den 10.09.2021, 12:34 +0300 schrieb Efraim Flashner: > I've been fighting my manifest to try to get "git" and "git:send- > email" both included, while using package transformations. For the > sake of brevity, here's a stripped down version of my manifest: > > (packages->manifest > (map specification->package+output > '("git" "git:send-email"))) > > Here's what I learned from some experimentation: > > (cmd)scheme@(guile-user)> (specification->package+output "git:send- > email") > $14 = # 7f730e918320> > $15 = "send-email" > (ins)scheme@(guile-user)> (list (specification->package+output > "git:send-email")) > $16 = (# 7f730e918320>) > (ins)scheme@(guile-user)> (list (specification->package+output > "git")) > $17 = (# 7f730e918320>) > > Meanwhile, (specifications->manifest '("git" "git:send-email")) does > actually return a manifest with both the "out" and the "send-email" > outputs of git. > > (package->manifest-entry (specification->package+output "git:send- > email")) > returns a manifest entry for "git:out" and > (package->manifest-entry git "send-email") returns a manifest entry > for > "git:send-email". I think for this use of specification->package+output you need to compose it with list like (compose list specification->package+output). The reason you observe this behaviours is that specification- >package+output returns multiple values, whereas package->manifest- entry expects a single value which is either a package or a list of the form (package "output"). Regards From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 14 05:55:40 2021 Received: (at 50501) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2021 09:55:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47603 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQ5AC-0001ZE-0r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 05:55:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56442) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQ5A9-0001Yy-RL for 50501@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 05:55:38 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46616) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQ5A4-0002Qc-C8; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 05:55:32 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=35598 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQ59x-0008IA-FE; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 05:55:32 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Liliana Marie Prikler Subject: Re: bug#50501: packages->manifest can lose the desired package output References: Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:55:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:26:25 +0200") Message-ID: <87ilz35vn7.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50501 Cc: Efraim Flashner , 50501@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Liliana Marie Prikler skribis: > Am Freitag, den 10.09.2021, 12:34 +0300 schrieb Efraim Flashner: >> I've been fighting my manifest to try to get "git" and "git:send- >> email" both included, while using package transformations. For the >> sake of brevity, here's a stripped down version of my manifest: >>=20 >> (packages->manifest >> (map specification->package+output >> '("git" "git:send-email"))) >>=20 >> Here's what I learned from some experimentation: >>=20 >> (cmd)scheme@(guile-user)> (specification->package+output "git:send- >> email") >> $14 =3D #> 7f730e918320> >> $15 =3D "send-email" >> (ins)scheme@(guile-user)> (list (specification->package+output >> "git:send-email")) >> $16 =3D (#> 7f730e918320>) >> (ins)scheme@(guile-user)> (list (specification->package+output >> "git")) >> $17 =3D (#> 7f730e918320>) >>=20 >> Meanwhile, (specifications->manifest '("git" "git:send-email")) does >> actually return a manifest with both the "out" and the "send-email" >> outputs of git. >>=20 >> (package->manifest-entry (specification->package+output "git:send- >> email")) >> returns a manifest entry for "git:out" and >> (package->manifest-entry git "send-email") returns a manifest entry >> for >> "git:send-email". > I think for this use of specification->package+output you need to > compose it with list like (compose list specification->package+output).=20 > The reason you observe this behaviours is that specification- >>package+output returns multiple values, whereas package->manifest- > entry expects a single value which is either a package or a list of the > form (package "output"). Yes, and Guile truncates multiple-value returns by default: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- scheme@(guile-user)> (list (values 1 2)) $7 =3D (1) scheme@(guile-user)> (+ (values 1 2) 2) $8 =3D 3 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 14 05:55:52 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2021 09:55:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47606 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQ5AL-0001Zc-9n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 05:55:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56498) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQ5AJ-0001ZP-VQ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 05:55:48 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQ5AE-0002Yc-NU for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 05:55:42 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=35602 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQ5AE-0008Te-F8 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 05:55:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:55:41 +0200 Message-Id: <87h7en5vmq.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #50501 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 50501 notabug close 50501 quit From unknown Fri Aug 15 20:52:27 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator