GNU bug report logs - #50497
[PATCH] Adding eww-{next,previous,up,top}-path.

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Yuchen Pei <hi <at> ypei.me>

Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 03:06:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch, wontfix

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: Yuchen Pei <hi <at> ypei.me>, 50497 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#50497: [PATCH] Adding eww-{next,previous,up,top}-path.
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:25:41 +0300
> Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net> writes:
>
>>> That's also true, so I was sceptical about adding that (because it also
>>> makes `C-s' etc behave sub-optimally in 99.7% of web pages), so I've
>>> been pondering whether to remove it (or at least hide it behind and
>>> option defaulting to "off").
>>
>> But users like it:
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/9oi1e3/ewws_awesome_isearch_support_just_blew_my_mind/
>
> Yeah, it's a neat trick (which makes people go "ooo").  So disabling it
> would be a shame.  But it does make the user experience slightly worse
> most of the time...
>
> Actually, we could just tweak it -- today it says "repeat for next
> buffer" even if there's no next buffer (it only checks afterwards),
> apparently.  Hm...  Right, if eww only sets
> `multi-isearch-next-buffer-function' when there's a rel=next/prev, then
> this awkwardness disappears.
>
> Now done.

Thanks, this makes perfect sense - when there are no next/prev links,
then normal isearch should be used.




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 276 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.