GNU bug report logs - #50476
[PATCH 00/10] Update guile-dbi and guile-dbd-*

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>

Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 14:46:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
Cc: 50476 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#50476] [PATCH 00/10] Update guile-dbi and guile-dbd-*
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:53:47 +0200
Hello!

Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net> skribis:

> * gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm (guile-dbi)[arguments]: Do not set LDFLAGS and
> RPATH in #:make-flags.
> [inputs]: Remove guile-dbd-sqlite3 and guile-dbd-postgresql.
> [native-search-paths]: Add LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

[...]

> +    (native-search-paths
> +     (list (search-path-specification
> +            (variable "LD_LIBRARY_PATH")
> +            (files '("lib")))))))

I think we should not add LD_LIBRARY_PATH as a search path spec as it
can have undesirable side effects; it’s just too broad and risky.

The difficulty here is that we want guile-dbi to be able to find its
guile-dbd-* plugins, right?  The previous method, which was to set the
RUNPATH of guile-dbi pointing to guile-dbd-*, sounds preferable to me:
it’s localized and does the job.

The downside of the RUNPATH method is that these are no longer really
“plugins”: you end up pulling them whether or not you use them.  Perhaps
you were concerned about the closure size?

If that really is a concern, I’d recommend taking a different approach,
such as using/defining a dedicated search path variable.

WDYT?

Thanks,
Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 234 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.