GNU bug report logs - #50446
Emacs FAQ entry "What is the real legal meaning of the GNU copyleft?" still relevant?

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>

Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 01:12:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #14 received at 50446 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Cc: 50446 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#50446: Emacs FAQ entry "What is the real legal meaning of
 the GNU copyleft?" still relevant?
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 18:23:38 +0200
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> writes:

> Take a look at this list, for example "Welte vs D-Link (2006)":
>
> https://wiki.fsfe.org/Migrated/GPL Enforcement Cases
>
> IANAL, YMMV, etc. but some of these look like court cases to me?

Yeah, outside the US there's been cases (a French court recently had a
case where they basically said that the GPL couldn't be used the way we
want it to be), but I assumed that this section was about the US...
since the FSF is a US company.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 310 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.