GNU bug report logs - #50344
C-x v keybinding for vc-print-branch-log

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>

Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 18:46:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Fixed in version 29.0.50

Done: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #184 received at 50344 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 50344 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi <at> gnus.org, juri <at> linkov.net,
 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Subject: Re: bug#50344: C-x v keybinding for vc-print-branch-log
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 15:11:06 +0200
>>>>> On Thu, 07 Oct 2021 15:56:30 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:

    Eli> That's the same as "no one", for the purposes of this discussion.

    >> Would you still deprecate it, with intent to remove? Or would you still 
    >> keep the binding?

    Eli> I didn't say I was against deprecating the command.  I said
    Eli> deprecating it is the only way to eventually usurp its key binding.

- itʼs undocumented except in NEWS.21
- the workflow itʼs intended for requires you to use the
  (undocumented) prefix arg to 'vc-next-action'
- and that workflow is something that I very much doubt anybody still
  uses (temporarily using RCS for CVS controlled files? Just use git,
  or hg or anything from the last 20 years)

    Eli> But deprecation will take time, and I was under the impression that
    Eli> Juri wanted the VC branch commands to have the binding NOW.

I can see that we want to be careful about deprecation, but this
command is *really* niche. How about we move it to C-x v B, and let
Juri have C-x v b ?

Robert
-- 




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 312 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.