GNU bug report logs - #50344
C-x v keybinding for vc-print-branch-log

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>

Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 18:46:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Fixed in version 29.0.50

Done: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #118 received at 50344 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Cc: 50344 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>,
 Filipp Gunbin <fgunbin <at> fastmail.fm>
Subject: Re: bug#50344: C-x v keybinding for vc-print-branch-log
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 10:29:18 +0300
>>> The command could have a mode for specifying START-POINT, so for Git the
>>> command becomes "git checkout -b new-branch-name START-POINT".  This
>>> could be on C-u (unless there're other frequent "customization" cases).
>> The existing API method has no argument for START-POINT.
>> Maybe every backend could handle its prefix arg directly
>> from current-prefix-arg?  For example,
>>   (defun vc-git-create-tag (dir name branchp)
>>     (if current-prefix-arg (completion-read "Start point: ") ...
>
> Maybe we should add a new argument, an optional one. Then backends which
> don't support it can continue working without 'C-u' (we can make sure to
> call them with appropriate number of arguments) but will obviously fail
> when passed an extra argument. We could even catch the error and report
> that the backend doesn't support this feature.

We need to add new optional arguments to another VC-API methods anyway, e.g.

  (vc-call-backend backend 'revision-completion-table files)

needs a new argument 'branchp' to avoid the recently added hack
'vc-git-revision-complete-only-branches' that can't be used
in the new command 'vc-switch-branch' by 'vc-read-revision'
(that also needs a new argument 'branchp').

> But maybe the command should prompt for START-POINT by default: one doesn't
> create branches that often to be bothered by an extra RET, and it can be
> useful to verify the branch you are branching off of every time you do
> it. That would be my preferred behavior. And the implementation could be
> the same if we manage to treat RET as unspecified START-POINT.

Prompting for START-POINT by default is ok.  The problem is how to handle
existing backends after adding new optional arguments to VC-API methods.
Maybe first to call with an extra argument, catch an error, then call again
without an extra argument?




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 313 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.