From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 01 11:26:48 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 15:26:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38839 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLS8W-0006Dy-3A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:26:48 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56628) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLHes-0006YC-Mc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:15:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36208) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLHer-0005D9-2a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:15:30 -0400 Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.134]:30517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLHeo-0006Lk-MZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:15:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 04:15:12 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pm.me; s=protonmail; t=1630469716; bh=KdE+fMrtWEGSnzNoA+8248X9vDaziMlgfLmy/3hzfFo=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:From; b=RbYuF2t4Iby0IZgOeg6lSMKFvhVamkt65saIcF9s17zrNGIvxRcCY9DCHgL2aOtKe oZo0yjVbI4PjN005zG8IFVSLvXQ1IR6rU1dMZk/hkm3KvhWunTGdpKyoPGxp8FhaYq 9HfF0UlKKhnXNWRGv9usWR662FeLcNUc2ZhxKqnpod5ZQIcPPAFR1eVmqJRDpjIn+s GGP0McLZrwW1JnNtWhHQobqeWBtNHGBkfpfjvIAIZ8e23jEJfJgAxd70hSsatlRZoj hB83C63Bgxov0EjypkVEKGppJhoCZYXXsg/pAAgFd9vtrJTteJU55YBj7qITJMMFcC 8WjjEQA1GqYog== To: "bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" From: Diego Subject: 28.0.50; Recent changes cause functions in sh-script-mode to be indented incorrectly Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.134; envelope-from=dieggsy@pm.me; helo=mail-40134.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:26:47 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Diego Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) I'm not quite sure when this behavior was introduced, but I suspect commits= 4bb70549 or 6392bc37a may be responsible: With emacs built from git on commit 03dcceeee if I have a function, say: myecho () { echo "foo" } And I call M-x indent-region on it, it gets indented to: myecho () { echo "foo" } Which I don't think is the correct indentation for functions in shell scrip= ts. Diego From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 02 02:16:31 2021 Received: (at 50320) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2021 06:16:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39433 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLg1X-0007mG-4N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 02:16:31 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com ([209.85.221.50]:33442) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLg1V-0007m1-M4 for 50320@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 02:16:30 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id b10so1075830wru.0 for <50320@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 23:16:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=KdFd9HWtJx+agd8gfLzSYSgOwhmcQM8nnn8GdmQvnjo=; b=csRPGVKJXptke9Ir0TMejCqLXVVfLd2bkYr20BjkC1E/GZXzRav9kVY8vo0ou/ronm 4biSKI3FxjEG+uXlt+bwZipRSBh9EA3deph+58i390HlurHzxU26Jkxv1RJ7ndsnjazZ ooPw0LOGlqS3yAUzPneg5zuX5EHfglhEELv6SCL9sPoGcnE8xnmmvkSjAFrUGnmooF7n TqPgLlQ6klT/mRRhdb6ecebtxrKHwexPKfPc7fg87+Ap34dKnMXIfdGsKLqOlGXQ1y5d 8pSEzAQHXwrc5dcRXgsDZ4TRTq8OYAIKePaJospZx6uuQg/F1BXjR32CYdXnr4nvgB+n Pttw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=KdFd9HWtJx+agd8gfLzSYSgOwhmcQM8nnn8GdmQvnjo=; b=rzhKmC9sLJYTYDxxKAhmqHWE0imM766bM3vR0vFDJoBosCXZPSTyqhpN04+0rjBiTX wIwMPCgxi4Zj9O6nIUPmMDqO9MEp/cLNrTAHR7H1McnVYHwUxF4cVa6bHrt3wGBvJIQD fu2RlT1MsI9fMQF+QTVZAjB9/MJUUUYznKUDIx+EH1e/jrFb9maMX8qqSLzRHwdSKB7R j1yEof6BVE+MoETFZ8OS8pK7m+OmTiH0Ml/3qZsLmXYCwzNzkIyiq9aq4r6tfQzK0Tbn dQUqOfnESFnyQ06x5yQo6gaUWCQt/anIUigreMiBDFd86I4HS+KiIe451IZCrb35zynh sx+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KatEgy4di8GDr6hVk2arobMVh3MI0ea3Dnlz/rOUSLNRUXLR0 NANp62go4ARa3e1JtSuaGvk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzeKsuHn830Vx2xoRjWoXt6DbsT2RjikcxAQKYLrRJ9mFhpn9u+mVVoHalMWz8AHDsOvpZjTg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5107:: with SMTP id s7mr1579507wrt.283.1630563383708; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 23:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from amdahl30 ([2a01:e0a:20e:d340:2ef0:5dff:fed2:7b49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f17sm700801wmf.4.2021.09.01.23.16.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 23:16:23 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin_Le_Gouguec?= To: 50320@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#50320: 28.0.50; Recent changes cause functions in sh-script-mode to be indented incorrectly References: Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:16:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Diego via's message of "Wed, 01 Sep 2021 04:15:12 +0000") Message-ID: <87v93j33k9.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50320 Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Diego X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Diego via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" writes: > I'm not quite sure when this behavior was introduced, but I suspect > commits 4bb70549 or 6392bc37a may be responsible: Seems to be 6392bc37a; reverting it makes your test case pass again. As things stand, I don't know enough about SMIE to understand what the correct fix is. A plain revert might be the best immediate action, unless someone knowledgeable enough can reconcile my commit with Diego's example. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 02 02:45:09 2021 Received: (at 50320) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2021 06:45:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39483 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLgTF-0000IZ-0s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 02:45:09 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:40644) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLgTC-0000AA-Sq for 50320@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 02:45:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=M7DyfASlriUHU++SlQR+kB0DF/sVVm4T3fnCQ4i5kmU=; b=ENk0Bl3fbXXgD48IakLtgoF2Kr DLB8Qgl4U+MHAwjSjnOZnikZpifKgSj3zMlnVmk4ZPAQXtmCFHbxRVqTkAwvgcIQ4P8pKCqWl69kV Lh618cvSjVf2ZFaD/vOSLOHQz3bnuCtG1UyL6Avc6+O/1k4pX3cz4h7GAPpCDMTy4Rkk=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLgT2-0007Xz-7i; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:45:00 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec Subject: Re: bug#50320: 28.0.50; Recent changes cause functions in sh-script-mode to be indented incorrectly References: <87v93j33k9.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:44:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87v93j33k9.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec"'s message of "Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:16:22 +0200") Message-ID: <87czprcw7t.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Kévin Le Gouguec writes: >> I'm not quite sure when this behavior was introduced, but I suspect >> commits 4bb70549 or 6392bc37a may be responsible: > > Seems to be 6392bc37a; reverting it makes your test case pass again. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50320 Cc: Diego , 50320@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) K=C3=A9vin Le Gouguec writes: >> I'm not quite sure when this behavior was introduced, but I suspect >> commits 4bb70549 or 6392bc37a may be responsible: > > Seems to be 6392bc37a; reverting it makes your test case pass again. I've now reverted the change and added a test. > As things stand, I don't know enough about SMIE to understand what the > correct fix is. A plain revert might be the best immediate action, > unless someone knowledgeable enough can reconcile my commit with Diego's > example. My understanding of SMIE is ... pretty vague. :-) --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 02 02:45:12 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2021 06:45:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39486 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLgTI-0000MA-8L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 02:45:12 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:40660) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLgTG-0000EQ-KR for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 02:45:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=9wqfOFfXfyQRTZKZHWlJ/tNzo/BZEQOwp2RQqUbyTaY=; b=ji1PP6dxpnu9+xXg4TJAhT8Pd8 s40eRbJ9Y4toGs6dELnWCSiMq/Ih1Ptz0NrDP6jxCpF8cVTHasR7k8Y6kBDT5UG3+DHwk0TMyztj5 I96CiQbF7EPCSrZQgrVX7CCibmNc864XQn9XoG4AnwlRt5fNhQ/YOX1o3PT294Yml00o=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLgT8-0007Yg-Lx for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:45:04 +0200 Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:45:02 +0200 Message-Id: <87bl5bcw7l.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #50320 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 50320 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 50320 28.1 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 02 03:54:15 2021 Received: (at 50320) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2021 07:54:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39625 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhY7-0008Sb-Bz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 03:54:15 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com ([209.85.221.47]:39904) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhY4-0008SM-8C for 50320@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 03:54:13 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id z4so1396824wrr.6 for <50320@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:54:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=zKXVQFsx+9843YYxIwE4Wdp6pi6diSnYvMTPmdiKI5k=; b=WNI81Krkv7fJxQZ750AOnJKHRS4Xt2n97RqdusLl6MvoFugC8qzbLVdRPNmxPBOFNC NvfN8h+KOTNS7XsVWgPlQh94yzKpi4AZeJkEmYevC2iMaToEzWKY4UO+byScI9/3z8Te NWchm2Uc4Rbj5HdPaj3WsqhD+yx/UKz8XVEqMx7TrmsEV87gdllwbEmynriZAwmomipG 6IiXztLyTt2uzSaCswloQDLWURnj1Sz27VOJhc7QA9ybCbgOmM1NUI4V2929qKkDPBih UutCBNTmu7y44GoM/arnZ/ITTvA4QxUUfCf04QEg51242eDMdf2/3AQ57ZC153sb5XaH Nbtg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=zKXVQFsx+9843YYxIwE4Wdp6pi6diSnYvMTPmdiKI5k=; b=r6C+EJkdouEkfDiKmK77BJ1TUHh3xyzUAcaWq8f20vdszDwq8dNOcCfChkoUw30XQd zIXUd8Sw31STDh8w/mlG4iLnbb3g5uPo1hvjPdSMLWs5iwZnKrDhDvWXgPJFIdEajrFT YSGlS4u+N4QIRy6QqdqGHl8MAnGtcY3Esnv0pbjfXt0ecimx5EWGS/+9118gfTyAKjnZ fKLLBc7PNLSLeCIlvN5nrBQ4Zn5U2ROhFut5eg1UuB6ia63iAHXeIHmq6hCFq0W2YZTi OkcuAoP3CoH9gQJmqCtZuFKpn7OUS1mk1bdAeWOgMn7hYCtcHfqbco6pnT0bg0omtmBg JugQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300LuJ6l0V9+ijmJEQOaa5osbCQDGkUWzzix/HvsS4MX3L4QJGe riB1LtsBdy7tdr7bvZaxwoM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwvOHRZyul3rIsjGNSCIViQry3ABVpi3mjHa9UH+YBgRVZvaPJphyZj+OD3Nc9gRXNgOrlzYA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:548e:: with SMTP id h14mr2031282wrv.7.1630569246285; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:54:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from amdahl30 ([2a01:e0a:20e:d340:2ef0:5dff:fed2:7b49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y15sm1031183wrw.64.2021.09.02.00.54.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:54:05 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin_Le_Gouguec?= To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#50320: 28.0.50; Recent changes cause functions in sh-script-mode to be indented incorrectly References: <87v93j33k9.fsf@gmail.com> <87czprcw7t.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 09:54:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87czprcw7t.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:44:54 +0200") Message-ID: <877dfz76qq.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50320 Cc: Diego , 50320@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I've now reverted the change and added a test. Thanks! > My understanding of SMIE is ... pretty vague. :-) I'll push (info "(elisp) SMIE") to the top of the stack on my nightstand, then :) From unknown Fri Sep 05 18:48:01 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator