GNU bug report logs - #50317
[PATCH 0/2] Update ‘ocaml-ppxlib’

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz>
Cc: 50317 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#50317] [PATCH 0/2] Update ‘ocaml-ppxlib’
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 10:07:07 +0200

Hi,

Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz> skribis:

> On Fri, Sep 03 2021, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz> skribis:
>>
>>> ‘ocaml-ppx-optcomp’ fails to build with the new ‘ocaml-ppxlib’, updating
>>> it makes it build again.
>>
>> In that case, I’d suggest updating both in the same commit, so that each
>> commit contains a working package set.
>
> Or maybe I could reorder the commits so that the ‘ocaml-ppxlib’ update
> comes last?

Yes, we can do that.

>> Unfortunately, at least one dependent fails to build:
>>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> starting phase `build'
>> File "src/ppx_variants_conv.ml", line 69, characters 22-41:
>> 69 |   if Caml.Hashtbl.mem Lexer.keyword_table s
>>                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Error: Unbound value Lexer.keyword_table
>> command "dune" "build" "@install" "--profile" "release" failed with status 1
>> builder for `/gnu/store/g73id3dchmqc0dirv9ahzmgbwsyba78b-ocaml-ppx-variants-conv-0.14.1.drv' failed with exit code 1
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> Could you check this one and other packages returned by ‘guix refresh -l
>> ocaml-ppxlib’?
>>
>
> Good catch!  There is a patch that should fix this issue[1]; should I
> apply the patch to fix the build?

Yes please!  Let me know when there’s something I should apply.  :-)

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.